Anonymous wrote:
Hang on Rob.
You have to face up to market facts.
PMR is so cheap and this industry is so 'cheapskate'.
Current GPRS communication is 'patchy' to say the least.
From my experience data downloads are ponderously.
Big fleets won't be able to cope with the sort of web-based speeds available for quite a while.
Anyway Good luck
(I await the blast)
No blast - just part of the market education exercise.
1. Cordic deals with market facts every day. Those who don't think they can afford us are welcome to go and buy a bag of nails and come back when they realise their mistakes....if you can give me a big enough sob story I might even consider offering a better deal...nah, scrap that, you should have learnt first time.
2. "Cheapskate" - I prefer "looking for value for money"
3. GPRS "patchy" ? Patchy as in patchy coverage or unable to support downloads while you are mobile? We have customers using/relying on the national coverage & we don't send large amounts of data (see 4 below). With regard to PMR, I seem to spend a lot of time listening to people moaning about PMR coverage and quality...now there is a patchy technology.
4. I agree that using GPRS for web-browsing and downloading is not perfect (yet - G3 anyone?) but for squirting compressed text messages and GPS updates to and from a mobile handset it is a perfect fit.
5. Big and small fleets want and need this solution. Anything based on PMR is a "get by" fix. It works, (sort of) and certainly be made cheaply but at what cost? Me, I would want to work on my golf swing & not worry about dataheads losing job info or heaven forbid a CLI pop-up crashing a booking terminal....as one prospect embarrasingly demonstrated to me.
Rob Mc