Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 9:33 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Man refused taxi driving licence

decision due to conviction for making racist comments to police years ago


A MAN from New Elgin was refused a taxi driving licence by Moray Council yesterday after making racist comments to police officers nearly four years ago.

Craig McDonald, of Meadow Crescent, was convicted and fined £75 in December 2004 for shouting obscenities at police officers outside Joanna's Nightclub, High Street, Elgin.

Members of the council’s licensing committee felt that due to this conviction he was unsuitable to drive a taxi.

Councillor Douglas Ross, deputy chairman of the committee, said: “You have already shown the committee that you can be racist and we cannot grant a licence knowing this.”

Mr McDonald denied that he was racist and blamed the outburst on his drunken state at the time. He said: “This is out of my character. I am not racist in one bit. I have had colleagues in the past who are black and had no problem with them.”

The committee noted that Mr McDonald had failed to write his criminal convictions on his application form for the licence, including a fine of £75 in 2004 for driving without wearing a seatbelt.

Licensing committee chairman Councillor Ronald Shepherd said: “You have shown a total disregard for the law.”

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:36 am
Posts: 550
Location: Plymouth
He can go back next year, convictions are classed as spent after 5 years arent they?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Darren63 wrote:
He can go back next year, convictions are classed as spent after 5 years arent they?


Not sure...thought all convictions were considered live and it was down to the discretion of the LA....but I'm probably a mile off.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Our licensing officer says there is no such thing as a spent conviction for taxi drivers. Every thing must be disclosed from when you were 10 years old. :shock:

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 4:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
I suppose it just goes to show what might have happened to the guys in Melton if they had decided to go to court?

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 376 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group