captain cab wrote:
Brummie,
From the sounds of it you were aware your LA had this surplus.
I know £250K is chickenfeed to a mere Brummie cab driver.....but the question is if you all knew this, why havent you or those reps of yours been creating a rather large smell about it?
Because a £250,000 surplus works out at approximately £17.92p per licence, which is absolutely zilch in the scheme of things.
1400 Hackney Vehicles (x £95) + 1550 Hackney Drivers (x £86) + 5,300 Private Hire Vehicles (x £86) + 5,600 Private Hire Drivers (x £86) + 100 Private Hire Operators (x £686) = 13,950 Licences.
Approximate annual licence income = £1,272,300
What's the point?
Reduce each licence by £20 & the surplus has gone, you're into deficit, licensing department costs, as all costs are always going up, & before you know it licensing department are in deep 'product of defecation'.
The surplus is tiny, when you compare it as a per licence amount.
IMO, we could do with a slightly higher surplus. In April this year we successfully argued for all licence fees to be frozen. The proposal at that time was for licence fees to go up by £3 to £5 per annum. In hindsight we should not have objected.