Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Apr 26, 2026 10:30 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 6:09 pm
Posts: 1180
Location: Miles away from paradise, not far from hell.
A member of the GMB hierarchy has asked for information re: ranks/pick up points where drivers have to pay to go through a barrier to be able to pick up their customers.

It appears the GMB have had legal advice that this might be in breach of the 1995 DDA, and they wish to collate as much information as possible.

Alex

_________________
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ

Simply the best taxi forum in the whole wide world. www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
If I had to pay to pick Terry up, I'd want a refund. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
I think both Birmingham and Manchester train stations have some sort of barrier that needs to be fed before you can pick up.

Most other major railway stations have permits.

It would appear that every airport has some sort of permit that allows either individual taxi/PH vehicles access, or an agreement with an individual taxi/PH circuit.

As far as I know only Heathrow and Manchester airports have the barrier systems.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:

As far as I know only Heathrow and Manchester airports have the barrier systems.


Liverpool has one.

Is he / they on about facilities for WAV's or drop off / pick up factilities for taxis on 'private' contracts?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Is he / they on about facilities for WAV's or drop off / pick up factilities for taxis on 'private' contracts?

From what I can gather the advice is that an extra cost shouldn't be added to the fare if a taxi is used.

So if a driver has to put on, say, a pound, due to the barrier costing a pound, then that's an extra charge for being disabled.

Now it could be argued that that extra charge would also apply to able bodied folks, but those able bodied folks can use the train, bus, walk etc. That isn't always available to WAV folks.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
I suppose a case could be made where WAV vehicles (if a mixed taxi fleet is on hand) pays 10%-20% less for permits than saloon vehicles.

Then they could excuse any WAV punter from having to pay extra. :D

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Is he / they on about facilities for WAV's or drop off / pick up factilities for taxis on 'private' contracts?

From what I can gather the advice is that an extra cost shouldn't be added to the fare if a taxi is used.

So if a driver has to put on, say, a pound, due to the barrier costing a pound, then that's an extra charge for being disabled.

Now it could be argued that that extra charge would also apply to able bodied folks, but those able bodied folks can use the train, bus, walk etc. That isn't always available to WAV folks.


I would suggest the extra charge is applicable to all......I know what you mean about the extra time to load a wheelchair, but how many drivers have applied the meter by the time they get out of the cab to load it in the first place?

I think many farecards cover tolls and charges.

Good points though, almost impressed. :shock:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
I would suggest the extra charge is applicable to all......

Didn't Ryanair get into trouble when charging for wheelchairs?

I think, from memory, they could charge if it was an oldie wanting a lift to the plane from the terminal, but not a wheelchair bound person.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Heathrow has a choice of easy access transport options from the Heathrow Express, The tube from T4, to a million low floor buses and of course Taxis.

Scrap the charge for us to use the Airports, Stations and Ports . . . now there's one for the GMB to concentrate on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
GBC wrote:
Heathrow has a choice of easy access transport options from the Heathrow Express, The tube from T4, to a million low floor buses and of course Taxis.

That's ok if WAV punters wish to go to the gloom of the city, if they want to go elsewhere their options are limited.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
GBC wrote:
Scrap the charge for us to use the Airports, Stations and Ports . . . now there's one for the GMB to concentrate on.

Every little helps, but I think even Che would struggle with that. :roll: :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:31 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Guess?
Sussex wrote:

Now it could be argued that that extra charge would also apply to able bodied folks, but those able bodied folks can use the train, bus, walk etc. That isn't always available to WAV folks.


I don't quite get this - without wanting to state the obvious, surely the charge doesn't discriminate between the disabled and the able-bodied?

If you then say that the disabled have no alternative then wouldn't that make any charge for the hire of a taxi discriminatory.

Thus free taxis for the disabled? :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
Fae Fife wrote:
I don't quite get this - without wanting to state the obvious, surely the charge doesn't discriminate between the disabled and the able-bodied?

The way I think the DDA is interpreted is that disabled shouldn't be treated equally, but better, due to their circumstances. In the same way the mush didn't have to pay for his spare legs on a plane recently. :shock:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 6:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 6:09 pm
Posts: 1180
Location: Miles away from paradise, not far from hell.
What are the procedures for picking up un-booked work at Edinburgh and Glasgow airports?

Are they via a barrier or via permits?

Alex

_________________
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ

Simply the best taxi forum in the whole wide world. www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 2:31 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Guess?
Sussex wrote:
Fae Fife wrote:
I don't quite get this - without wanting to state the obvious, surely the charge doesn't discriminate between the disabled and the able-bodied?

The way I think the DDA is interpreted is that disabled shouldn't be treated equally, but better, due to their circumstances. In the same way the mush didn't have to pay for his spare legs on a plane recently. :shock:


Well the barrier has nothing to do with disablement, so to that extent there's equality if all passengers are charged any premium.

As for giving the disabled more favourable treatment, as I said earlier does that mean we should be giving the disabled a discount on normal fares?

How far do you take this? Free taxis? :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1462 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group