Nigel wrote:
His car was a 2001 plate with no doubt a million miles on the clock, surely it would have paid him to get new motor and scrap the one he was driving because it was costing him to much in repairs and time off the road. Cap it's over to you.
I dont like age restrictions and unfortunately cases like this make it difficult to speak against them.
I think a council should be able to use the power they have to encourage drivers to maintain vehicles better......if you pass your test 1st time on all occasions then why have three tests per year? Why not make it two or one depending upon your performance?
I'm not sure how it makes the driver unfit and proper, in my view it means he is sh*t at maintaining his cab.....not necessarily the same as sh*t at driving it.
CC