Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri Oct 25, 2024 6:33 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 10:21 pm 
But saloon prices have only kept a plate premium because its cheaper to buy one than a WAV.
When phase 1 of councils have to have 100% WAVs, then your plate premiums will be no-more.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 1:37 am 
Anonymous wrote:
But saloon prices have only kept a plate premium because its cheaper to buy one than a WAV.
When phase 1 of councils have to have 100% WAVs, then your plate premiums will be no-more.




Phase 1 will never be fulfilled, the disabled groups don't want 100% WAVs they want 100% tolerant drivers and adequate provision, as all of those who believe that ONLY people in wheelchairs are disabled are guilty of discrimination under the exact same act.

Other phases will be abandoned as they were in 2000 and the government along with our european brothers will have to come up with some other way of telling the disabled community whats best for them.

Give the public ALL OF THEM what they want


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 1:40 am 
Sorry I didn't finish.

Often plate prices are quoted at £50K on here, now if you went out and bought a brand spanking new TX11 GOLD you'd still have change from YOUR quoted cost of a plate.

Keep the arguments consistant gentlemen.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 1:55 am 
Nidge wrote:
Sussex wrote:
steveo wrote:
indeed i always wondered why councils where trying to force all WAV in some areas. a couple of years ago when i used to own another business i was told i would be exempt from the act because the cost invloved in making changes to my office would be 'un-reasonable' for the amount of wheelchair business i did. surely it would also be 'un-reasonable' to force a self employed saloon HC owner/driver to buy a £30K WAV.

I think you are quite right in terms of a £30,000 TX2, but I'm not so sure that a court will view a £20,000 E7 etc compared to a £15,000 Mondeo as being un-reasonable.

Or for that matter, a £10,000 Fiat thing. :shock:


Think about the bus firms who are spending millions for disabled access buses only to be used by a few per month.



yes lets think about them 25% new bus grant?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 7:13 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 55019
Location: 1066 Country
Anonymous wrote:
Phase 1 will never be fulfilled, the disabled groups don't want 100% WAVs they want 100% tolerant drivers and adequate provision, as all of those who believe that ONLY people in wheelchairs are disabled are guilty of discrimination under the exact same act.

Look I didn't write the DDA, but Phase 1 will happen.

In fact it's happening already. Many councils have already made changes to their licensing condition on the back of Phase I and OFT, with loads more in the pipe-line.

Pre the publication of the Phase 1 list I would have agreed that it might not happen, but now it's too late. And this government a) wont change their views, and b) will be here for a while. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 7:18 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 55019
Location: 1066 Country
Anonymous wrote:
Often plate prices are quoted at £50K on here, now if you went out and bought a brand spanking new TX11 GOLD you'd still have change from YOUR quoted cost of a plate.

No, plates can cost up to £50,000, that's a fact. What people put that plate on is, more times than not, up to them.

However the fact that some choose to put a £50,000 plate on the back of a pile of [edited by admin], is a sad reflection of the cab trade.

Wouldn't we be viewed in a better light if we put a £10 plate on the back of a £50,000 motor? :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37321
Location: Wayneistan
Your possibly right sussex.

However, I can remember being in a council meeting prior to delimitation in my area.

A PH owner driver stood up and said "we want hackney licenses to give a better service to the public, thats what its about, the public"

The same PH driver, now HC, currently does a school contract twice per day and goes home, he only works the streets and services the public on a Saturday night. eusasmiles.zip

regards

Captain Cab


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 12:33 pm 
And I expect that's repeated up and down the country.

But it does put to bed the often repeated scare-mongering that the streets will be flooded with cabs following de-limitation. :wink:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 2:31 pm 
John Davies wrote:
With regard to legislation you know as well as anybody else that ambigous legislation is and has always been determined by a court of law. The DDA is not exempt from that process no matter what. It should also be noted that this act is a civil act and any legal deliberations will take place in the civil courts rather than the criminal courts.





My understanding of the current position is as follows:

The general provisions of the DDA are irrelevant to the trade insofar as it relates to vehicle specification. This exemption is fairly unambigous.

But the DDA does allow the Govt to pass regulations which will oblige taxi drivers to run accessible vehicles. But at present no regulations have been passed, so there is currently no legal obligation on LAs to compel the trade to run accessible vehicles.

However, LAs can specify accessible vehicles using their powers under the more general licensing law.

Clearly, whether they do this or not is a political decision, not a legal obligation, but many of the arguments comprehensively outlined in your earlier posts are the kind that would be considered by LAs thinking of going down this route. Clearly there is also lengthy DfT guidance on the subject.

Of course, it would be open to anyone to challenge an LA specifying WAVs under existing licensing and local government law, and I daresay the DfT guidance and the like would be considered by the judge, but I suspect that in strict legal terms the DDA would be irrelevant.

I assume that someone in the past has challenged an LA that has decided to go all WAV, but have presumably been unsuccessful.

This is probably still the most relevant law as regards any LA currently thinking about going all WAV.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 4:52 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 55019
Location: 1066 Country
TDO wrote:
I assume that someone in the past has challenged an LA that has decided to go all WAV, but have presumably been unsuccessful.

This is probably still the most relevant law as regards any LA currently thinking about going all WAV.

I suspect someone from the Manchester area will put me right, if I'm wrong, but Manchester Council was the first one to Mandate.

My books says that in the late 1980's the council issued 100 new licenses to drivers who would plate a WAV. This was appealed to the courts, but in the meantime the council decided to make all taxis, both existing and new, WAVs.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37321
Location: Wayneistan
Anonymous wrote:
And I expect that's repeated up and down the country.

But it does put to bed the often repeated scare-mongering that the streets will be flooded with cabs following de-limitation. :wink:


not really guest, the guy could do the same job in private hire

regards


Captain Cab


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2004 10:56 pm 
Sussex wrote:
TDO wrote:
I assume that someone in the past has challenged an LA that has decided to go all WAV, but have presumably been unsuccessful.

This is probably still the most relevant law as regards any LA currently thinking about going all WAV.

I suspect someone from the Manchester area will put me right, if I'm wrong, but Manchester Council was the first one to Mandate.

My books says that in the late 1980's the council issued 100 new licenses to drivers who would plate a WAV. This was appealed to the courts, but in the meantime the council decided to make all taxis, both existing and new, WAVs.


1987 Les R objected to the condition that the 100 new plates be wheel chair converted. He argued that the condition did not apply to the rest of the fleet therefore the condition was unreasonable.

There was no conditions about age of vehicle, the court ruled that the council were quite within their legal right to make the condition of wheelchair access on the new licences while at the same time exempting the other 450 licence holders.

Best wishes

JD


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 6:33 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 55019
Location: 1066 Country
Alex wrote:
CABBIES FACE BOOT OVER WHEELCHAIRS

Taxi drivers in Bristol who are not fit enough to lift wheelchair-bound passengers into their cars could have their licences taken away. The city council wants disabled people to have equal access to taxis in Bristol and is set to introduce wheelchair loading tests as part of drivers' medical assessments, which they must pass before they can work in the city.

I wonder how this chap would do in Bristol? :?

http://www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk/wiltsh ... s22ZM.html

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 8:06 pm 
The DDA was passed to stop discrimination against disabled people. If they refuse or revoke a licence because of a persons disability then they are in breach of the DDA and wide open to legal challenge.

This is where the implimentation of the DDA to taxis is up its own arse.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 12:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 10:45 am
Posts: 913
Location: Plymouth, i think, i'll just check the A to Z!
Sussex wrote:
I wonder how this chap would do in Bristol? :?
http://www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk/wiltsh ... s22ZM.html


i like the bit that says:
"This is the fourth purpose-built taxi he has purchased through LTI Vehicles' Birmingham main dealer, Mann & Overton. It has also been fitted with a special seat to allow Allan more room to keep his legs in a comfortable position when driving."

what about the rest of the drivers that would like more room to be comfortable in?!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sussex and 290 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group