Frank Lay wrote:
Aye jimmy boy,
Just like the pathetic wee moaner that you are, complain about the council but not prepared to stand up and do something about it.
Just you stay on the sidelines, and watch the big boys play.
I do worry about your facination with rape and sexual assault.
If something else does happen, I do hope the police have the sense to check you out.
In December 2007 the Scottish Government issued its Best Practice Guide for councils in respect of taxi licensing:-
Section 8 stated:
Licensing requirements which are unduly stringent will tend unreasonably to restrict the supply of taxi and PHC services, by putting up the cost of operation or otherwise restricting entry to the trade.
Local licensing authorities should recognise that too stringent an approach may not be in the public interest - and could, indeed, have safety implications.
Section 9 added:
For example, it is clearly important that somebody using a taxi or PHC to go home alone late at night should be confident that the driver does not have a serious criminal record and that the vehicle is safe. But on the other hand, if the supply of taxis or PHCs has been unduly constrained by onerous licensing conditions,, ....
..... then that person's safety might be put at risk by having to wait on late-night streets for a taxi or PHC to arrive; he or she might even be tempted to enter an unlicensed vehicle with an unlicensed driver illegally plying for hire.
City of Edinburgh Council ignored this best practice Guide, and continued its policy to restrict taxis. Council Solicitor Robert Millar was a member of the working party which compiled the Best Practice criteria. He knew about them - both when the council raitified its policy to restrict in November 2007 and later when the council was refusing licence applications.
Sexual assault #1
In August 2008 a 26-year-old woman suffered a serious sexual assault after being picked up in the city centre by a possible bogus private hire car driver. The victim had left the Hudson Hotel in Hope Street at the west end at around 2.15am on Sunday August 17 and got into the dark-coloured saloon. She was driven from there to Brunstane Road South, where the man is believed to have assaulted her within the vehicle. The suspect in that particular incident was described as black, 35 to 40 years old, medium build, with black short hair and a round face.
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Jim/My%20Documents/EdinburgRapes.htm
This incident reflects the specific circumstances warned about, indeed "predicted", in the Best Practice Guide - he or she might even be tempted to enter an unlicensed vehicle with an unlicensed driver illegally plying for hire (Section 9).
This is precisely what happened.
Yet, Edinburgh's Council deliberately ignored the Scottish Government's warning. This female was sexually attacked in the precise circumstances warned about in section 9 of the Best Practice Guide.
Sexual Assault #2
In February 2009 the same thing happened again. Once again a female was sexually attacked in the precise circumstances warned about in section 9 of the Best Practice Guide.
http://news.scotsman.com/edinburgh/Woma ... 6171988.jp
This time the perpetrator was apprehended and brought to justice.
Trial Judge Lady Smith said, "What she needed was a taxi to uplift her and take her safely back to the hostel where she was staying".
The above is all factually correct Frank, but you seem to have some difficulty understanding it. What part don't you understand?
I really can't see the problem you seem to be having
