toots wrote:
In my book what you're doing is using rape to further your own desires and this is more than shameful.
So a taxi driver wants to operate a taxi without paying a grossly inflated premium. He points out to the authorities that the BPG says that onerous licensing requirements could compromise public safety and tempt them to use unlicensed vehicles. He points out that two females in his area have been seriously sexually assualted after using unlicensed vehicles.
And you call that shameful?
Quote:
Am I prepared to put my daughters lives at risk? well I do it every day and will continue to do so for as long as we are all alive. The simple fact is I've educated my daughters to use licenced taxis or ph only. Never to walk away from the main streets and lights, never to talk to strangers, never get in vehicles or go anywhere with people they don't know, they have been given personal alarms, advised to keep small sprays in their bags just in case they need to spray some in some pervs eyes. The list of preparation for my daughters education as they grew up is quite long and boring but it was done by me the parent, it is my responsibility not anybody elses. The strange thing is even with all the licences and all the prep work I've done with them there is always a risk no matter where they are or what they are doing.
That's fine, but in the rest of the world things aren't quite so clear cut. For example, the BPG states that a risk might arise when
waiting on late-night streets, and you surely can't deny that? And yes, there will always be a risk, but even if the risk is marginally lowered by a free market rather than having £40k plate premiums then what do you think a reasonable person would prefer?
Lower risk to safety or plate premiums?
Quote:
What I'm not happy with is people like you using it to further your needs and desires. Have you any idea what you're talking about. Do you know what it is like to be raped, assaulted, told the fecking walk by the licenced taxi driver because you don't have enough money. I'll repeat one of my last questions just in case you missed it previously.
So what do you think of people who prefer profiteering to less risk? And remember, it's the Scottish Government's BPG in question here, not the profiteers or wanabees on this forum.
Quote:
When was the last time you gave a lift home to a young girl obviously worse for wear and with little or no money just so they wouldn't get raped? I mean purposely given the lift not accidently cos she didn't have enough when you got there.
You're being flippant here, surely? Are you saying that we should all be offering free lifts to people who normally walk because they can't afford a taxi (say) to reduce their risk of coming to harm?
I suspect we've all done favours to vulnerable females - unless they're blatantly taking the mick, as we all know some of them do - but we're all trying to make a living, and the point comes back to the profiteering and the public benefit, as per the BPG.
Quote:
So where was you with your mate Tonto? You could have rescued her ffs. She could have simply waited a little minute or so for one to turn up or she could have rang for a PH vehicle to come get her. People wait for buses, trains, planes why not for a taxi.
But again the point is that if there's an improvement in availability then does that trump plate premiums?
Quote:
It is not for the lack of taxis this girl was raped it was a stupid montary lapse of good judgement and a determined perv for which everybody is looking to blame anybody but the person who committed the act in the first place, it's a sorry state but if it hadn't been this girl it would have been another. Others are using it to further their own means. You make me sick to be honest
So given the amount of females getting into PH illegally plying for hire and bogus cabs across the UK, there must be a helluva lot of momentary lapses in judgements going on, but thankfully normally there's no real harm done.
But how many times have you read on here about females coming to harm after getting into a vehicle that they thought was a legitimate taxi?
The problem is basically that the system is a mess of different policies and practices throughout the country and the confusion that causes.
For example, in Edinburgh a couple of decades ago there were very few PHC - and there still are very few by national standards - so punters knew what they were looking for and were more aware of what wasn't legitimate. But the black cab monopoly changed all that, and private hire numbers ballooned, with the inevitable illegal plying etc. And this includes quite a few out of area vehicles and the odd unlicensed car. So now it's more of a mess, hence the potential for people coming to harm.
Did you know, for example, that PHVs in Edinburgh didn't even have plates until a handful of years ago? Hence the greater than usual potential for unlicensed vehicles to operate, and things like that don't change overnight.
But you seem to be blaming a multitude of factors - and I would agree that there are many in play, with no particular change that would provide a magic bullet - but you dismiss one aspect out of hand, and that aspect was described by a Member of the Scottish Parliament as a "very disturbing problem", and that was just referring to the trade in plates rather than the wider implications.
Thus I don't know how you can come out with stuff like: "Others are using it to further their own means. You make me sick to be honest."