Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 6:18 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Cabbie assaulted ex wife and her partner he found in bed together

Tuesday, 2 November, 2010 18:08 PM

A London cabbie flew into a rage when he found his wife in bed with another man at their Fenland home, magistrates heard this week.

According to the couple found in bed, Michael Potten was armed with a tyre wrench when he walked into the bedroom.

But he claims to have had nothing more than a mobile phone in his hand before he assaulted the pair.

Potten, 45, admitted two charges of assault when he appeared before Fenland magistrates.

But he did not accept the version of events given to the court by the Crown Prosecution Service, so evidence will be heard by Fenland magistrates on January 25, before he is sentenced.

Prosecutor Andrea Fawcett said Potten and his wife of 16 years were estranged, and his wife was in bed with her new partner at Murrow on September 1 when she was awoken by a stomping sound.

“The bedroom door opened and the defendant was standing in the doorway holding an item believed to be a tyre wrench,” she said.

Potten was abusive, and hit the bed with the item he was holding.

He then pushed his wife, she landed on the floor, and he punched her, causing her nose to bleed. He punched the man in the face.

“There is no suggestion he used the tyre wrench and both complainants left the premises, “ she said. “They noticed he was still holding the wrench.”

When arrested in the early hours, Potten said he had gone to the property because he thought “something was going on” at home.

“I found my Mrs in bed with another bloke, I was in a rage,” he told police.

Potten, 45, of St Luke’s Estate, in London EC1, denied that the couple were estranged, and denied having a wrench with him at the time of the assault. He admitted slapping his wife, but denied punching her.

Potten, who is a member of the RAF Reserve and is due to go to Afghanistan in October, was given conditional bail until his sentencing.

Source; http://www.wisbechstandard.co.uk/news/c ... r_1_716022

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Potten, 45, admitted two charges of assault when he appeared before Fenland magistrates.

But he did not accept the version of events given to the court by the Crown Prosecution Service, so evidence will be heard by Fenland magistrates on January 25, before he is sentenced.

A Newton Hearing for those not as clever as me. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Potten, 45, admitted two charges of assault when he appeared before Fenland magistrates.

But he did not accept the version of events given to the court by the Crown Prosecution Service, so evidence will be heard by Fenland magistrates on January 25, before he is sentenced.

A Newton Hearing for those not as clever as me. :wink:

WTF is a Newton Hearing?

Is it simialr to a Lord Nelson telescopic viewing?

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
http://www.hse.gov.uk/enforce/enforceme ... earing.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
skippy41 wrote:
http://www.hse.gov.uk/enforce/enforcementguide/court/magistrates-hearing.htm

Oh I see!!

"I'm guilty me Lord, but not as guilty as them lot over there say I am!"

FFS!!

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
them fenland boggitts are a strange lot fancy not knowing the differance between a mobile phone and a tyre wrench mind you perhaps theyve never seen a mobile phone out wisbech way :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
I don't think it will just be regarding the wrench it will also be regarding the matter as to whether they are indeed estranged as she claims. If there is no legal seperation it may well be he has good mitigating circumstances, thus reducing whatever sentence he may have expected

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
toots wrote:
I don't think it will just be regarding the wrench it will also be regarding the matter as to whether they are indeed estranged as she claims. If there is no legal seperation it may well be he has good mitigating circumstances, thus reducing whatever sentence he may have expected

It will be the weapon.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 1:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Sussex wrote:
toots wrote:
I don't think it will just be regarding the wrench it will also be regarding the matter as to whether they are indeed estranged as she claims. If there is no legal seperation it may well be he has good mitigating circumstances, thus reducing whatever sentence he may have expected

It will be the weapon.


You're probably right, but, he will still have better mitigating circumstances if they are not estranged

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
toots wrote:
You're probably right, but, he will still have better mitigating circumstances if they are not estranged

Indeed but that would have come out in the first hearing.

What the bench will decide on is was the 'weapon' a phone, or a wrench.

If it was a phone he will get unpaid work, IMO, if it was a wrench he will go to jail.

Either way, if he is a London cabby, he will lose his license.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 599 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group