greenbadgecabby wrote:
TDO wrote:
So am I right or wrong, or are you just trying to dodge the issue?
By the way, I don't know why you think I'm trying to be an 'expert' on the London trade, I merely made a remark that was heavily qualified by the words 'I suspect', so again it looks like you are trying to misrepresent me to deflect attention from the substantive point.
There's that ISSUE word again, just what issue am i trying to avoid??
![Neutral :-|](./images/smilies/neutral.gif)
So it would be reasonable to suggest you seem to have a bit of a hang up about the London trade. I can't help it if we are the cream down here . . or if its quiet where you work, still look on the bright side all this free time to reply to our entries.
I posited that London drivers were CAPABLE of earning more than other drivers in the UK - that was the
issue.
You then made a remark implying that I thought myself an expert on the London trade. I suggested that you were saying this to dodge the ISSUE.
Rather than me having a hang up about the London trade, I think you may have a paranioa about it.
Remeber that I said that I would concede the point (ie the ISSUE in the first paragraph above) since I clearly couldn't know as much about the London trade as youand then asked you for your view on the ISSUE, but you just ignored me.
Now your twisting things to say that I have a hang up about the London trade.
But obviously it's just you trying to deflect attention from you DODGING the issue.