Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat Apr 04, 2026 6:01 am

Board index » General » Cab Act 201?

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 3
  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
toots
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
MR T wrote:
toots wrote:
MR T wrote:
may I suggest that the Law Commission only has a team of three ..... if you were to organise responses from all areas.... you would probably have 30 -40,000 replies each requesting confirmation of receiving their reply... overwhelm them... make it a blood less fight....


Sometimes I feel it's like drawing blood from a stone, if you have a plan tell us about it :D

This consultation is also going out to the general public... which would mean brothers, sisters mother's, father's ,anties and uncles and friends.... take one well-thought-out reply. take one photo copier. aske people to read and sign if they agree.. collect replies together and post.. take a small collection from the local taxi trade.. postage... remember to ask them to confirm they have received your reply.... phase one....

ps... I like to make people think for themselves.....


I know you do but I'm chilling with a nice glass of wine and it makes my head hurt to think too much :D

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!
Top
 Profile  
 
MR T
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
You lucky girl.. I'm just bored.... recuperating after my latest visit to hospital

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!
Top
 Profile  
 
toots
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
MR T wrote:
You lucky girl.. I'm just bored.... recuperating after my latest visit to hospital


Well make sure you do and I'll have a glass for you. If I start talking worse sh*te than usual I've probably had too much :D

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!
Top
 Profile  
 
MR T
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 10:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
toots wrote:
MR T wrote:
You lucky girl.. I'm just bored.... recuperating after my latest visit to hospital


Well make sure you do and I'll have a glass for you. If I start talking worse sh*te than usual I've probably had too much :D

how will I know :lol:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!
Top
 Profile  
 
toots
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
MR T wrote:
toots wrote:
MR T wrote:
You lucky girl.. I'm just bored.... recuperating after my latest visit to hospital


Well make sure you do and I'll have a glass for you. If I start talking worse sh*te than usual I've probably had too much :D

how will I know :lol:


Cos it'll take forever for me to reply and when I do there will be lots of gaps :D

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!
Top
 Profile  
 
toots
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
MR T wrote:
toots wrote:
MR T wrote:
You lucky girl.. I'm just bored.... recuperating after my latest visit to hospital


Well make sure you do and I'll have a glass for you. If I start talking worse sh*te than usual I've probably had too much :D

how will I know :lol:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!
Top
 Profile  
 
toots
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Ooops :oops:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Dusty Bin
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 3:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
replies must reach them before August 10th

I think it's going to take me till then to actually digest the report. :sad:


Indeed, and perhaps a hundred or more pages to provide a substantive response, which will probably be largely ignored anyway.

Which is why I won't be bothering. Been there, done that with the OFT.
Top
 Profile  
 
edders23
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20806
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
I think some sort of reply to at least one issue should be sent as Mr T says if we flood them out with responses maybe they will scrap the report or start again or even produce something actually of merit

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector
Top
 Profile  
 
gusmac
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
Or maybe they will file 13 all the responses and do what they want anyway :roll:

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image
Top
 Profile  
 
Dusty Bin
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
gusmac wrote:
Or maybe they will file 13 all the responses and do what they want anyway :roll:


Indeed, particularly if they get thousands of boilerplated responses as suggested by Mr T.

In fact I suspect that would harm any case being made rather than make the LC change course.
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 8:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Dusty Bin wrote:
Indeed, and perhaps a hundred or more pages to provide a substantive response, which will probably be largely ignored anyway.

Which is why I won't be bothering. Been there, done that with the OFT.

Well I will be bothering, as I can't carry on suggesting to folks to do this that and the other, if I do f*** all.

Will it have an effect, who knows, but doing nothing defo will have no effect.

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
Dusty Bin
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 8:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Sussex wrote:
Well I will be bothering, as I can't carry on suggesting to folks to do this that and the other, if I do f*** all.

Will it have an effect, who knows, but doing nothing defo will have no effect.


I'll send yours as well then :lol:
Top
 Profile  
 
edders23
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20806
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
surely Dusty you are not suggesting that you and sussex are the same person :shock: :shock: :shock:



Thats Dooms Job ! :lol:

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector
Top
 Profile  
 
MR T
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Dusty Bin wrote:
gusmac wrote:
Or maybe they will file 13 all the responses and do what they want anyway :roll:


Indeed, particularly if they get thousands of boilerplated responses as suggested by Mr T.

In fact I suspect that would harm any case being made rather than make the LC change course.

How would it harm.... I have played their little games for many many years... different departments in the government.... if an associations respond that is classed as one response..... even if that association has a 1000 members, the LC are collecting evidence, we have to provide that evidence. if they ignore that evidence, the MPs who will be eventually voting Yes or No will be asking why .... but by that time the trade will have spoken to every single MP.... but First we have to provide the evidence.... if our replies are basically the same,so what, their are not many important things we disagree on....

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 3
  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » General » Cab Act 201?

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 689 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group