Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Oct 27, 2024 8:18 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
trotskys twin wrote:
gusmac wrote:
blackpool wrote:
They are the establishment allways have been,as far removed from normal folk as the royals

And just as untouchable.


Get collared overcharging in yer sherbert and your a fekking war criminal this mob rig the interest rates NOTHING HAPPENS and you know why because the population of this Nation are grovelling lickspittle serville cap doffing Tory voting inbred german VON WINDSOR worshipping gormless cretins as so well illustrated by the Cab Industry bottom of the league of all workers M0RE HOURS FOR LESS DOUGH THAN ANYONE ELSE :evil: gutless pathectic retard's especially the EX Services shyttte :evil: :evil: :evil:

ANYWAY HAVE A NICE WEEKEND I'M GOING ON THE GARGLE =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

Bacardi breezer ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37322
Location: Wayneistan
blackpool wrote:
Bacardi breezer ?


A little bit of a gay drink for a raging militant surely?

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 4955
Location: Lincoln
captain cab wrote:
blackpool wrote:
Bacardi breezer ?


A little bit of a gay drink for a raging militant surely?



Vodka shots for el tel.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
captain cab wrote:
blackpool wrote:
Bacardi breezer ?


A little bit of a gay drink for a raging militant surely?

Homophobic aswell as racist ? :D Maybe he likes it by the jugfull :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
This will be his....

Image

Do svidanya!

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 8:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 55035
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
blackpool wrote:
Bacardi breezer ?


A little bit of a gay drink for a raging militant surely?

I wondered why he likes it down here so much. Image

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Daily Mail saturday 10th feb EDITORIAL why havnt bankers who caused this recession been nicked he he looks like the ball is at last starting to roll.


perhaps one of you clever dicks can post it up??????????????????????????????

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
blackpool wrote:
Bacardi breezer ?


A little bit of a gay drink for a raging militant surely?

I wondered why he likes it down here so much. Image


I was straight till i met you DARLING and all those sexy clubs you took me too ooooooooohh :D

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37322
Location: Wayneistan
trotskys twin wrote:
Daily Mail


wouldn't read that sh*te.....horrible bunch of cnuts.


http://www.newstatesman.com/media/2008/ ... ail-report

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
captain cab wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
Daily Mail


wouldn't read that sh*te.....horrible bunch of cnuts.


http://www.newstatesman.com/media/2008/ ... ail-report



The Daily 'foaming at the mouth' Mail?

You gotta love 'em. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
I try to avoid Der Stürmer as much as possible :D

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
GBC wrote:
captain cab wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
Daily Mail


wouldn't read that sh*te.....horrible bunch of cnuts.


http://www.newstatesman.com/media/2008/ ... ail-report



The Daily 'foaming at the mouth' Mail?

You gotta love 'em. :D


The Daily **** agreed but the article is vehemently attacking cameron for NOT getting on with nicking the BANKSTERS and as such is a good read, so perhaps one you geniouses could post it up????????? please :D :D its beyond my skills :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37322
Location: Wayneistan
was this the one??

Making the bankers pay would be a REAL bonus



Royal Bank of Scotland boss Stephen Hester’s £780,000 bonus is surely an insult to all of us. We own 81 per cent of the shares, and had to pay a £390 million fine for the bank’s global interest-rate rigging.

A justification I heard yesterday was that Hester hadn’t had enough bonuses.

‘Stephen has had only one bonus out of four years, which we think is already quite a severe level of clawback through a different route,’ explained RBS chairman Sir Philip Hampton to the Sunday Times.

Clawback is the term — American in origin — which describes a government, or firm, demanding the return of money which has been dished out wrongly. For instance, huge commissions and bonuses paid for deals which turned out to be duds, losing billions for investors.

The way bankers think is this: they deserve their bonuses, and if they don’t get them, that’s a form of clawback.

How about some real clawback? RBS is reportedly ‘asking’ former directors to return the bonuses they ‘earned’ while the Libor (the rate at which banks lend to one another) was being rigged, and payment protection insurance mis-sold. So far, we are told no one has agreed to pay back their ill-gotten gains.

Hester’s bonus is for 2010, when the Libor rigging was going on.

‘It is wholly unacceptable that Hester should receive a bonus for 2010 when these scandals were still going on,’ says Lib Dem peer Lord Oakeshott.

The rigging itself was a ploy to boost their bonuses.

Banks are like the NHS. No one takes responsibility for bad practice and the taxpayer picks up the bill. They’re like our national health provider in another sense: governments are frightened of them.

Most of us don’t get bonuses, or share options, no matter how well we perform. Most of us are paid a fraction of the £1.2 million Hester receives. Nor do we work for companies which recklessly lent money deposited by us and had to be bailed out by the Treasury.

Yet bankers, politicians and the business world generally hailed Hester as something just short of a saint for agreeing to take over RBS when his spivvy predecessor, Fred Goodwin, retired to enjoy his enormous personal wealth and pension plan.

It was said that a knighthood — or a peerage — would be offered once his work was done to mark the gratitude of the nation.

Does Hester need a £780,000 bonus? Of course not. He’s already a wealthy man, sitting on a pot of shares due to mature in May and worth £2 million.

He seems to be receiving the bonus partly to justify the continuation of such payments in the banking community, whatever the performance of the banks.

‘We are not contemplating, for the avoidance of doubt, clawing back Stephen’s bonus award that was made in 2010,’ says Hampton.

Being owned 81 per cent by the taxpayer doesn’t appear to affect those in charge at RBS. The Government might not have encouraged this view, but Chancellor George Osborne has said nothing I am aware of to suggest otherwise.

Where can we turn for help? How about the new, Canadian-born Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney? Surely, he could get the message across — that it’s just not on for bankers underpinned by the state to ladle out bonuses to themselves.

Carney faced MPs last week and justified his £800,000 salary plus £250,000 housing allowance by saying his package was ‘the equivalent’ of that enjoyed by outgoing governor Mervyn King.

He didn’t sound like a chap to oppose the remuneration of other bankers. His background as a former Goldman Sachs executive isn’t encouraging either.

How were they described again? ‘Like a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money,’ said Rolling Stone magazine.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z2KhAtphbL

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
captain cab wrote:
was this the one??

Making the bankers pay would be a REAL bonus



Royal Bank of Scotland boss Stephen Hester’s £780,000 bonus is surely an insult to all of us. We own 81 per cent of the shares, and had to pay a £390 million fine for the bank’s global interest-rate rigging.

A justification I heard yesterday was that Hester hadn’t had enough bonuses.

‘Stephen has had only one bonus out of four years, which we think is already quite a severe level of clawback through a different route,’ explained RBS chairman Sir Philip Hampton to the Sunday Times.

Clawback is the term — American in origin — which describes a government, or firm, demanding the return of money which has been dished out wrongly. For instance, huge commissions and bonuses paid for deals which turned out to be duds, losing billions for investors.

The way bankers think is this: they deserve their bonuses, and if they don’t get them, that’s a form of clawback.

How about some real clawback? RBS is reportedly ‘asking’ former directors to return the bonuses they ‘earned’ while the Libor (the rate at which banks lend to one another) was being rigged, and payment protection insurance mis-sold. So far, we are told no one has agreed to pay back their ill-gotten gains.

Hester’s bonus is for 2010, when the Libor rigging was going on.

‘It is wholly unacceptable that Hester should receive a bonus for 2010 when these scandals were still going on,’ says Lib Dem peer Lord Oakeshott.

The rigging itself was a ploy to boost their bonuses.

Banks are like the NHS. No one takes responsibility for bad practice and the taxpayer picks up the bill. They’re like our national health provider in another sense: governments are frightened of them.

Most of us don’t get bonuses, or share options, no matter how well we perform. Most of us are paid a fraction of the £1.2 million Hester receives. Nor do we work for companies which recklessly lent money deposited by us and had to be bailed out by the Treasury.

Yet bankers, politicians and the business world generally hailed Hester as something just short of a saint for agreeing to take over RBS when his spivvy predecessor, Fred Goodwin, retired to enjoy his enormous personal wealth and pension plan.

It was said that a knighthood — or a peerage — would be offered once his work was done to mark the gratitude of the nation.

Does Hester need a £780,000 bonus? Of course not. He’s already a wealthy man, sitting on a pot of shares due to mature in May and worth £2 million.

He seems to be receiving the bonus partly to justify the continuation of such payments in the banking community, whatever the performance of the banks.

‘We are not contemplating, for the avoidance of doubt, clawing back Stephen’s bonus award that was made in 2010,’ says Hampton.

Being owned 81 per cent by the taxpayer doesn’t appear to affect those in charge at RBS. The Government might not have encouraged this view, but Chancellor George Osborne has said nothing I am aware of to suggest otherwise.

Where can we turn for help? How about the new, Canadian-born Governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney? Surely, he could get the message across — that it’s just not on for bankers underpinned by the state to ladle out bonuses to themselves.

Carney faced MPs last week and justified his £800,000 salary plus £250,000 housing allowance by saying his package was ‘the equivalent’ of that enjoyed by outgoing governor Mervyn King.

He didn’t sound like a chap to oppose the remuneration of other bankers. His background as a former Goldman Sachs executive isn’t encouraging either.

How were they described again? ‘Like a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money,’ said Rolling Stone magazine.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z2KhAtphbL


Nice try Capt but the one i referred to was the editorial from Sat the 10th Feb the essence of it being 187 cozzers let loose on the press regarding phone tapping etc , but evidently not one on the banksters regarding the rigging of libor the article was vehement in attacking Cameron and the Banks who they blamed for CAUSING the recession and quoted many of the e-mails by the fraudsters congratulating themselves on the racket, their line being these e-mailers should be easy to identify and PROSECUTE :D AND ADDING PERHAPS THEY WERE TOO CLOSE TO CAMERON AND THE TORYS MAYBE EVEN THEY HAD DONATED TO THE PARTY ASTOUNDING FOR THE MAIL BUT ITS THERE

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
Is this it?

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: The Tories hang the police and Press out to dry while letting the real crooks - their banker chums - off scot free...

By Daily Mail Comment

PUBLISHED: 23:34, 8 February 2013 | UPDATED: 23:34, 8 February 2013

Today, we report on the plight of Detective Chief Inspector April Casburn, who was last week sentenced for telephoning a red-top newspaper because she was angry at the way terrorism officers' time was being wasted on the hacking of celebrities' phones.

She received no money. Nothing was ever published.

But she received a sentence of 15 months which the judge said would have been three years if she were not adopting a child.

In a week in which it emerged not a single person has been held accountable for the 'criminal' treatment of patients at Stafford Hospital, the Mail believes its fair-minded readers, having read of Mrs Casburn's treatment, will think her punishment is utterly disproportionate.

They may also suspect, correctly we believe, that this is yet another example of a dictatorial State crushing any individual who dares reveal wrongdoing.

Compare Mrs Casburn's incarceration to the leniency with which the Tories' friends in the banks have been treated.

This week, it was the turn of the Royal Bank of Scotland - which has cost the taxpayer so many billions of pounds - to have its money-grubbing dishonesty exposed.

As RBS was fined £390 million for its part in the Libor rate-rigging scandal, its traders' emails were released.
Dishonest: Royal Bank of Scotland - which has cost the taxpayer so many billions of pounds

Dishonest: Royal Bank of Scotland - which has cost the taxpayer so many billions of pounds

One joked about how he manipulated the rates up and down, and wrote the obscene message: 'I'm like a Lady of the Night drawers'. Another boasted: 'its amazing how much Libor fixing can make you that much money'.

Let's not mince words. Apart from being deeply shocking, such behaviour is unequivocally criminal.

So the Mail has a question to ask: why hasn't there been a single prosecution of any member of a banking community that has wreaked such damage on Britain? Their blatant criminality couldn't be clearer.

Standard Chartered was ordered to pay more than $300 million to settle charges it violated US sanctions on Iran, Burma, Libya and Sudan.

Prosecutors said that - by hiding 60,000 transactions with Iran worth $250 billion over nearly a decade - it had been aiding terrorists, drug runners and arms dealers.

HSBC was forced to pay a record £1.2 billion settlement for 'turning a blind eye' to large-scale money laundering by drug cartels, terrorists and rogue regimes.

For its part, Barclays, which had been colluding with other banks across the globe, was fined £290 million for trying to manipulate Libor.

But while the institutions have been fined, with the taxpayer often picking up the bill, not a single banker has faced trial.

And what of the recession the banks caused? Again, the staggering truth is not a single banker has been investigated for the criminal greed, hubris and misjudgement that plunged Britain into years of austerity.

Not a single banker has been jailed for their disgraceful tactic of tricking their customers into buying billions of pounds of payment protection insurance (PPI) they didn't need.

Not a single banker has been brought to book for mercilessly ripping-off tens of thousands of small businesses with a complex insurance policy designed to protect them if interest rates increased, but which, perversely, forced them to pay more when rates fell. This drove many to bankruptcy when the recession hit.

Has a single Tory minister expressed outrage at this failure of justice? Has the PM ordered a Leveson-style inquiry into the banks?

Now compare the way the Tories have turned a blind eye to the crimes of the bankers with the savage treatment meted out to Britain's struggling Press.

All newspapers - even the majority who were not involved in hacking - have been subject to a full judicial inquiry which, surprise, surprise, exonerated the politicians for their sycophancy to Rupert Murdoch, while recommending statutory regulation of a Press which had been free for 400 years.

Meanwhile, the police have dedicated 185 officers to investigating complaints - mostly by celebrities - that their voice mail was listened to.
So far 50 journalists (and nine police) have been arrested - often in dawn raids on their homes, while their families slept - and the News of the World has been shut down.

The Mail unequivocally condemns the conduct of News International.
But these sins are mild compared with rigging interest rates, selling bogus insurance and laundering terrorist money, which could have contributed to the murders of undercover anti-drug agents.

The bankers destroyed lives, bankrupted businesses and caused a recession which threatens our children's futures.

Meanwhile, as the police, Serious Fraud Office and Crown Prosecution Service sit on their hands, public outrage against the banks grows - flushing the financial system with the poison of mistrust.

If the banks' good name is ever to be restored, the justice being wreaked so savagely on the likes of Mrs Casburn must be applied to those in the financial community who have engaged in such devastating criminality.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... z2Khh6aM4c

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 149 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group