Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Sep 13, 2026 10:54 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 11:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 19277
One to make Sussex happy :D 8-[

(And apparently 'pled guilty' is more of an American and Scottish thing rather than 'pleaded guilty', in case anyone wants to nitpick my thread title [-( )


Nelson taxi driver was 4 times over cocaine derivative limit

https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/n ... ive-limit/

A taxi driver who tested positive for the derivative of cocaine and was more than four times the legal limit pleaded not guilty to drug driving.

Blackburn Magistrates' Court heard Sana Majeed initially denied driving while under the influence of drugs, but he later changed his plea to guilty.

However, this was not before the prosecution had incurred massive costs in commissioning an expert report.

Majeed, 28, of Hendon Road, Nelson, pleaded guilty to driving while over the limit for benzoylecgonine.
He was fined £120 with a £48 victim surcharge and £1,085 costs.

He was disqualified from driving for 12 months.

District Judge Alexandra Preston said the defendant knew he had recently taken cocaine and should have known what that meant because he was a professional driver working as a taxi driver.

"You delayed your plea of guilty for a long time, and that meant the prosecution had to get a full forensic report and that cost a lot of money," she said.

Darren Fitzpatrick, prosecuting, said Sajeed had been stopped by police because of a marker on his vehicle.

He gave a positive roadside test for cocaine and the evidential test showed benzoylecgonine at a level of 206 micrograms per litre of blood, against the legal limit of 50mcg.

"The prosecution incurred costs of £1,500 for the preparation of an expert report following his not guilty plea," said Mr Fitzpatrick.

He said Sajeed had no previous convictions.

Sajeed said he had used cocaine the night before on a night out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 12:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 19277
Some stuff in the comments about the fact of actually having limits for illegal drugs - of course, the reason for having limits in the first place so as not to catch out accidental exposure, or whatever.

However, someone has posted this wee anecdote in the comments. Aye, right :roll:

Quote:
The father of a young man about to be married went on the stag do in Amsterdam, walked unwittingly into a brown cafe on the wrong floor of the place he wanted (one of those Bulldog ones), realised it wasn't the booze selling bar he wanted and left. Leaving Gatwick airport two days later, was hit by a post office van. The automatic drug test showed he was over the limit for weed. It cost him over £5000 to prove he hadn't smoked or eaten any while in the 'dam.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2026 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57907
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
"The prosecution incurred costs of £1,500 for the preparation of an expert report following his not guilty plea," said Mr Fitzpatrick.

And he should have had those costs awarded against him. :-k

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 734 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group