GA wrote:
I think you should refer your thoughts to where the argument began ...................... and not where it ended up.
My allegation .......... which you disputed .......... was that TDO was sending copies of "Myth and Reality" around local authorities (particularly those who restricted numbes) in a bid to influence their policy decisions.
This was further added to by a list of what JD believed to be the "plate values" for HC in the same restricted area's.
Now ................. you only wish to suggest otherwise to prevent you from apearing foolish.
You banned me for asking the questions .................. and you banned others for asking why you weren't answering them.
B. Lucky
More drivel from the Gateshead Liar.
No point in responding in detail, because it's all been said further up the thread.
But the liar deploys his usual trick of repeating what he's said earlier despite the points having been addressed - clearly the liar thinks that if he tells a lie often enough and ignores all evidence to the contrary then his lies will be believed.
Sad or wot
Login
Register
FAQ
