GA wrote:
Maybe you'd consider that links to a website, shown on your website, to be worthy of so much protection ......................... I just fail to see the signifigance or understand the magnitude of your actions.
If you bothered to read the post for a change you'd realise that the links were irrelevant to what went on, and it was your mate who went off at the deep end, and that happened well before I realised that he'd copied my links page.
I only found out when I looked at his website and in any other context might not even have mentioned it, but since he helped himself to other stuff and then threw a wobbly then I thought it worth mentioning.
But I suspect you knew that anyway, but nothing like trying to stir things a bit, as per the vast majority of what you post
Quote:
If he was suspected of removing site content, or material that was unique to this site then I would understand .............. but come on, its only links to other sites which he could have put on his own site without having to consult you first anyway.
Yes, but he blatantly copied the descriptions word for word, which is lazy and unscrupolous if you ask me.
And it had nothing to do with his tantrum in any case.
Quote:
Again I'm critised for asking for explanation for the administrative actions of this site ...................... am I next to be banned
for daring to question.
Well you're obviously always trying to be banned, presumbly so you can play Mick the Martyr to your buddies.
After all you seem to contribute little else
Login
Register
FAQ
then maneuver around cones forward and back emergency braking without hitting the examiner, feck missed again 
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
