Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2025 6:51 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Remember the mass exodus of Leceister railway station when the local licensing enforcement team descended upon the station cab rank? Well it would appear leicester cabbies have done it again only this time there is no mention of the station.
_________________________

Leicester Mercury

November 23, 2007 Friday

Passengers stranded as drivers flee tests

Fuming taxi customers were left without transport after drivers fled vehicle safety checks.


Licensing officers pulled over 60 vehicles for tests in an eight-hour Friday-night blitz on private-hire firms.

Ten taxis were ordered off the road after the inspectors found 'serious defects' in the vehicles.

But passengers said the blitz had left them standing on the kerbside unable to get a cab after drivers ditched a night's work rather than risk having their vehicle taken out of service.

Council bosses say the spot checks 'save lives', but taxi unions say the checks are unnecessary and want Leicester City Council to introduce quarterly MOT tests instead.

Licensing officers, backed up by police, decided to target mainly private hire cabs in the inspections on November 16.

The officers visited taxi offices across the city and flagged down vehicles in the street to carry out the tests.

Nine private hire cars and one hackney cab were ordered off the road due to serious defects, while another five cars were found to have minor problems and were given notice to make the repairs.

Mike Ward, chair of the Leicestershire Public and Private Hire Association, said: "The inspectors have been coming round a lot in the last three weeks, and it's too much.

"A lot of lads feel you get failed for the slightest thing, which takes you off the road.

"With all the stopping and starting, something small will go in the car.

"They'd rather give up £100 for the night and go home than risk having to pay £28,000 for a new cab.

"We'd prefer a strict regime of MOT tests every four months, and outside of that to be left to get on with the job."

One man, who did not wish to be named, said: "I called every taxi firm on Friday night and couldn't get a cab at all.

"They told me all the cars were in because of the council tests.

"I couldn't believe it. It's incredibly annoying for them to do it on a Friday when everyone needs a cab."

A council spokeswoman said the tests generally happened on Fridays when drivers had the most incentive to keep their car on the road.

She said: "Spot checks are part of our licensing policy for taxis in the city. The aim of these checks is to ensure that taxis licensed in Leicester are safe.

Coun Robert Wann, the council's environment spokesman, said:

"We have public safety at the heart of the policy. We are not going to apologise for doing these checks, and we shall continue with them."
_______________________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20103
10 out of 60 taken off the road would sugest to me that the tests will and should continue. If there were no cars failed for a couple of consecutive operations then maybe they wont be done so often.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56826
Location: 1066 Country
I think the council need to carry out a few more spot-checks at ranks where the cabs can't escape.

The only reason drivers go home on a busy Friday night early is cos they have got something to hide.

Be it the state of the vehicle or the (maybe) unlicensed driver behind the wheel. :shock:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
If Jimbo was arround no doubt he would be comparing restricted areas with unrestricted areas and suggesting that one is more prone to these sort of events than the other but which one?

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group