GA wrote:
No .......... its because the PH operators want it ................ and the HC trade only react when this is introduced or formally suggested.
Acting after the horse has bolted.
Of course the champion of PH ..... JD ..... will support this type of condition ..... because PH operators are the ones with the money to pay his consultancy fee's.
Preparing for the personal abuse ............. ok.
I keep saying this but "you never cease to amaze me" but for all the wrong reasons? lol
I think by now, everyone who subscribes to TDO knows that I tell it like it is. If I believe something is outside the law or perhaps sailing too close to legal reality then I will say so, regardless of whether it appertains to Hackney carriage or private hire legislation.
I have to remind you that the exact situation has already been discussed in respect of Brighton. My views back then are the same as they are now and if anyone is interested in my views on the matter then they only have to read my comments in the various Brighton threads appertaining to this condition of license. I can't revive your memory but one of the threads on the subject is posted below.
My personal opinion is that the condition wouldn't stand the legal test in a court of law and even if it did the driver of the vehicle is not required to obey such a condition.
Therefore it may suit the council to make all newly licensed wav vehicles conditional on a radio being fitted but I suppose everyone but you realises that the council has no power by law to insist the driver of the vehicle uses the radio. That is precisely what I have said in the past and I have no intention of changing my mind.
I don't think I need say anymore, do I?
http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtop ... c&start=80
Regards
JD