Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 23, 2026 10:53 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57329
Location: 1066 Country
I've often wondered how these firms get around the cross-border issues of the 1976 act. :?

http://www.frasereaglemanagementservice ... ?tabid=213

http://www.taxibankuk.com/index.htm

Now if they only passed on work to taxis then that's ok, but they pass on work to whoever is the cheapest or a member of their gang, and more times than not they are PH. :shock:

So how do they do it one has to ask? :roll: :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57329
Location: 1066 Country
One further issue is the umpteen different Limo websites who act as booking agents for Limos throughout the country.

So how will these folks be legal come next month? :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:36 am
Posts: 550
Location: Plymouth
Sussex wrote:
I've often wondered how these firms get around the cross-border issues of the 1976 act. :?

http://www.frasereaglemanagementservice ... ?tabid=213

http://www.taxibankuk.com/index.htm

Now if they only passed on work to taxis then that's ok, but they pass on work to whoever is the cheapest or a member of their gang, and more times than not they are PH. :shock:

So how do they do it one has to ask? :roll: :roll:


Considering taxibank is John Preeces operation the work going to PH is a cert.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Sussex wrote:
One further issue is the umpteen different Limo websites who act as booking agents for Limos throughout the country.

So how will these folks be legal come next month? :wink:


Umpteen? How many can you name?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 9:30 pm
Posts: 990
Location: The Global Market
The 'loophole' is the fact that they are acting as a 'booking agent' for the company requesting travel.

They are not the ones allocating work to the vehicle/driver.

Now the Executive car company in Sussex who take bookings from a major company near me (130 miles away) and then send 3 or 4 local unlicensed vehicles is clearly breaking the law..... but they are cheaper.

Several of my major customers book journeys with my company through an agent (normally the travel agent who books flights and hotels for them).

You claim the same 'loophole' for companies like mine who have a web booking system. The booking software for web bookings is run by Cordic and their software sends the booking into my system.

_________________
A member of the Hire or Reward Industry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57329
Location: 1066 Country
Tom Thumb wrote:
The 'loophole' is the fact that they are acting as a 'booking agent' for the company requesting travel.

They are not the ones allocating work to the vehicle/driver.

But they are, as the 1976 act defines, operating,
"operate" means in the course of business to make provision for the invitation or acceptance of bookings for a private hire vehicle;

And if they are doing that for private hire vehicles, which the act defines as,
"private hire vehicle" means a motor vehicle constructed or adapted to seat [fewer than nine passengers], other than a hackney carriage or public service vehicle [or a London cab] [or tramcar], which is provided for hire with the services of a driver for the purpose of carrying passengers;

Then IMO they needs ops licenses for every area they send work to. :shock:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57329
Location: 1066 Country
Tom Thumb wrote:
You claim the same 'loophole' for companies like mine who have a web booking system. The booking software for web bookings is run by Cordic and their software sends the booking into my system.

The difference is you are a licensed operator, who only gives work to vehicles licensed by the same council as you.

So you are a good guy. :D

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 9:30 pm
Posts: 990
Location: The Global Market
So all you need to do is take on Preece and Green (?) in the courts.

That means we will need 100K plus in legal fees and promises to pay their's if you lost.

_________________
A member of the Hire or Reward Industry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 7:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57329
Location: 1066 Country
Tom Thumb wrote:
So all you need to do is take on Preece and Green (?) in the courts.

That means we will need 100K plus in legal fees and promises to pay their's if you lost.

I wouldn't dream of it, but the law is the law. The fact that in this instance the law is a joke is neither here nor there.

I would say the answer would be a national operator's license, but I'm not sure that's something I want. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Steve Almond or Dave Craddock are the two gentlemen that can give us the answer to the question of how they get around the law in relation to acting as an agent for Private hire companies.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Fraser Eagle are registered in the Burnley area so they are acting as an operator in Burnley in the course of business of making provision for the acceptance of bookings for private hire vehicles. If they have an operators license and are using their own vehicles and drivers licensed in the same area then they are not infringing any laws but that is not the case. The cases of Rendal and Bromsgrove immediately spring to mind, which if interpreted to the letter of the law would make the activity of Fraser Eagle illegal.

The Chairman of NALEO John Thompson likes to beat the drum for the eradication of cross border hiring but he's not so hot on confronting a blatant breach of the law in respect of Fraser Eagle. Why hasn't NALEO acted in Burnley in the shape of the local Licensing Officer, your guess is as good as mine?

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:39 am
Posts: 400
Location: Manchester Airport
JD wrote:
Fraser Eagle are registered in the Burnley area so they are acting as an operator in Burnley in the course of business of making provision for the acceptance of bookings for private hire vehicles. If they have an operators license and are using their own vehicles and drivers licensed in the same area then they are not infringing any laws but that is not the case. The cases of Rendal and Bromsgrove immediately spring to mind, which if interpreted to the letter of the law would make the activity of Fraser Eagle illegal.

The Chairman of NALEO John Thompson likes to beat the drum for the eradication of cross border hiring but he's not so hot on confronting a blatant breach of the law in respect of Fraser Eagle. Why hasn't NALEO acted in Burnley in the shape of the local Licensing Officer, your guess is as good as mine?

Regards

JD


They also hold an International PSV Operator's Licence and a travel agency so I would presume that is what entitles them to book "travel" for third parties.

_________________
you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57329
Location: 1066 Country
Tulsablue wrote:
They also hold an International PSV Operator's Licence and a travel agency so I would presume that is what entitles them to book "travel" for third parties.

The only thing/being that's able to give/pass work to a PH driver and vehicle is a licensed PH operator licensed in the same district as the vehicle it gives/passes the work to.

No exceptions are allowed. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
In response to JD......I understand the booking comes from Malta.

regards

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Tom Thumb wrote:
So all you need to do is take on Preece and Green (?) in the courts.

That means we will need 100K plus in legal fees and promises to pay their's if you lost.


It shouldn't be for anybody other than our very own legal system that should be taking these people on. If they are breaking the law then the LA's should be either closing them down and let them fight in court to be re-opened or take them to court using tax payers money and send the proper message to anybody else who is considering running this type of unlicensed business.

Quote:
In response to JD......I understand the booking comes from Malta.


What implications does that have?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 291 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group