Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Jul 03, 2024 5:19 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 3:13 am 
Read the article here:

http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/hoctc.htm

Discuss the issues below!


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 3:50 am 
Well congratulations om a fact based contribution without opinions.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54419
Location: 1066 Country
I quite sure the author will be pleased with such a compliment. :D

However if there was ever a more one sided Select Committee meeting, then I hasn't seen it.

How can a S/C have a hearing, yet ignore 50% of the trade, and ignore 100% of their voters, and our customers?

Democracy at it's worst I'm afraid. :(

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 1:10 pm 
Sussex Man wrote:
I quite sure the author will be pleased with such a compliment. :D

However if there was ever a more one sided Select Committee meeting, then I hasn't seen it.

How can a S/C have a hearing, yet ignore 50% of the trade, and ignore 100% of their voters, and our customers?

Democracy at it's worst I'm afraid. :(



come come Sussex,
some are saying the OFT was one sided, sometimes things do not go our way.

this time they had a different view.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 1:12 pm 
Sussex Man wrote:
I quite sure the author will be pleased with such a compliment. :D

However if there was ever a more one sided Select Committee meeting, then I hasn't seen it.

How can a S/C have a hearing, yet ignore 50% of the trade, and ignore 100% of their voters, and our customers?

Democracy at it's worst I'm afraid. :(



come come Sussex,
some are saying the OFT was one sided, sometimes things do not go our way.

giving you a plate is not to be seen as in the best interests of uk taxi customers

this time they had a different view.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 1:12 pm 
Sussex Man wrote:
I quite sure the author will be pleased with such a compliment. :D

However if there was ever a more one sided Select Committee meeting, then I hasn't seen it.

How can a S/C have a hearing, yet ignore 50% of the trade, and ignore 100% of their voters, and our customers?

Democracy at it's worst I'm afraid. :(



come come Sussex,
some are saying the OFT was one sided, sometimes things do not go our way.

giving you a plate is not to be seen as in the best interests of uk taxi customers

this time they had a different view.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54419
Location: 1066 Country
Again, I heard you the first time. :?

The difference between the OFT and M&R, and the aptly named Select Committee, is that the former are based on evidence, the latter is based on out-dated dogma and rhetoric.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 4:05 pm 
Sussex Man wrote:
Again, I heard you the first time. :?

The difference between the OFT and M&R, and the aptly named Select Committee, is that the former are based on evidence, the latter is based on out-dated dogma and rhetoric.



the three, were not deliberate it was so bloody slow, I am sorry.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2004 10:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 8:45 pm
Posts: 62
Location: Perth Scotland
Sussex Man wrote:
Again, I heard you the first time. :?

The difference between the OFT and M&R, and the aptly named Select Committee, is that the former are based on evidence, the latter is based on out-dated dogma and rhetoric.


Surely the other way round - It could not be more obvious that the OfT tried desperatly, and failed, to get the evidence to fit their preconceived ideas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 1:17 am 
Railway child wrote:
Sussex Man wrote:
Again, I heard you the first time. :?

The difference between the OFT and M&R, and the aptly named Select Committee, is that the former are based on evidence, the latter is based on out-dated dogma and rhetoric.


Surely the other way round - It could not be more obvious that the OfT tried desperatly, and failed, to get the evidence to fit their preconceived ideas


That comment is unfair, unjust and biased.

They started with a clean sheet and idiots in our trade, and some on here got the terms of reference extended to private hire.

if you insist on blaming anybody blame the bloody stupid medlers, who have been consistent in slowing the process and putting the most stupid evidence.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54419
Location: 1066 Country
Railway child wrote:
Surely the other way round - It could not be more obvious that the OfT tried desperatly, and failed, to get the evidence to fit their preconceived ideas


See I can't see why they needed to justify the end of quotas, I think it called the 'real world'.

Why should one side of the trade be protected from fair competition?

As M&R states, if this was a private under-taking, those involved could be banged up. :shock:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 11:41 am 
Railway child wrote:
Sussex Man wrote:
Again, I heard you the first time. :?

The difference between the OFT and M&R, and the aptly named Select Committee, is that the former are based on evidence, the latter is based on out-dated dogma and rhetoric.


Surely the other way round - It could not be more obvious that the OfT tried desperatly, and failed, to get the evidence to fit their preconceived ideas


What Pre conceived ideas might that be?

best wishses

John Davies


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54419
Location: 1066 Country
Far be it for me to speak for the Wharfie, but perhaps he means preconceived 'economic sense'.

In other words, markets seldom work best when competitor are restricted from entry into that trade.

So really it's not that surprising that the lads at OFT found quotas to be a bad thing.

Perhaps the most surprising thing, is that there are people who think it's a good thing. :shock:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 4:18 pm 
Sussex Man wrote:
Far be it for me to speak for the Wharfie, but perhaps he means preconceived 'economic sense'.

In other words, markets seldom work best when competitor are restricted from entry into that trade.

So really it's not that surprising that the lads at OFT found quotas to be a bad thing.

Perhaps the most surprising thing, is that there are people who think it's a good thing. :shock:


Wharfie did not use the word preconcieved, railway child did

keep up with the debate Sussex.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2004 6:14 pm 
Anonymous wrote:
Sussex Man wrote:
I quite sure the author will be pleased with such a compliment. :D

However if there was ever a more one sided Select Committee meeting, then I hasn't seen it.

How can a S/C have a hearing, yet ignore 50% of the trade, and ignore 100% of their voters, and our customers?

Democracy at it's worst I'm afraid. :(



come come Sussex,
some are saying the OFT was one sided, sometimes things do not go our way.

this time they had a different view.


Not one sided they just didn't have a clue :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group