MR T wrote:
It is a sad day when large private hire companies can influence the making of a new act so that they can become the equivalent of the old mill owners of the 19th and 20th century... but I suppose money talks.... it certainly pays for good representation
It certainly does pay - I mean its not as if one national organisation has actually paid their admin for two years now
That aside - and I'm only guessing here - my guess is that the HC trades response to the LC from the provinces went entirely around limitation of numbers and plate values..........I'd also wager there was very little about technology and very little justification for pointing out why cross border PH is a really daft idea.
And I'm guessing again - but I reckon the reason why the LC has actually given ground on the deregulation argument is down to the efforts of the HC trade in their response - I'd also wager the reason they see no issue with cross border PH is because the HC trade failed to make valid arguments.
My final guess - is that the LC see PH as a choice a customer makes when they pick up a telephone and dial a number - I think they think - if the customer gets a really crappy service they wont call the PH company again - because that is how the market system works.