Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Jul 03, 2024 8:14 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 760 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 51  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 7:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Hampshire (HC)
jimbo wrote:
cabbyman wrote:
Source?


brown, please....


Go and find the Nile!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 431
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/p ... 2376000529

We now go to ping pong (the bill is passed back and forth between commons and Lords to agree amendments). Royal ascent can be Midnight of that day. Ping pong day has yet to be anounced.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 19411
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
surely the election will be announced before then


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 431
http://services.parliament.uk/bills/200 ... ality.html

Ping pong day anounced, the day the election is called, further amendments have been made, they are to be discussed on that day. What a day to bury bad news.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9164
tom2907 wrote:
http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2009-10/equality.html

Ping pong day anounced, the day the election is called, further amendments have been made, they are to be discussed on that day. What a day to bury bad news.


Id rather they buried Harriet Harperson..... :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54419
Location: 1066 Country
tom2907 wrote:
What a day to bury bad news.

Not all of us believe it's bad news, in fact I haven't read a single article/story in the trade press slagging it off.

But maybe they haven't realised yet. :roll: :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9164
Sussex wrote:
tom2907 wrote:
What a day to bury bad news.

Not all of us believe it's bad news, in fact I haven't read a single article/story in the trade press slagging it off.

But maybe they haven't realised yet. :roll: :roll:


Probably the latter... :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8522
I have had conversations with two of the major survey companies just recently and I asked them what their opinion was of the Department for Transport's plan to use three areas to trial their idea of percentages.................. strangely enough they said it would be impossible to formulate a percentage across the country by using this method.... so if it ends up with no percentage of the fleet being required.... you will simply have a Act that will State.... councils will not be able to refuse a licence to Anyone that provides a wheelchair accessible vehicle...........

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
MR T wrote:
I have had conversations with two of the major survey companies just recently and I asked them what their opinion was of the Department for Transport's plan to use three areas to trial their idea of percentages.................. strangely enough they said it would be impossible to formulate a percentage across the country by using this method.... so if it ends up with no percentage of the fleet being required.... you will simply have a Act that will State.... councils will not be able to refuse a licence to Anyone that provides a wheelchair accessible vehicle...........

Even if they are already 100% WAV & have a no issue of HCVL policy, because a recent survey has confirmed NSUD?

Surely not?

But if so, then we are all quadruple f*cked!!!

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54419
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
I have had conversations with two of the major survey companies just recently and I asked them what their opinion was of the Department for Transport's plan to use three areas to trial their idea of percentages.................. strangely enough they said it would be impossible to formulate a percentage across the country by using this method.... so if it ends up with no percentage of the fleet being required.... you will simply have a Act that will State.... councils will not be able to refuse a licence to Anyone that provides a wheelchair accessible vehicle...........

I think the survey companies will say and do anything to keep their noses in the trough.

The DfT said, and you was there, that the same % would apply to all councils that restrict. In the same way the original act said so, although in that case it was 100%.

But even if the survey leeches were right, a restricting council that has 100% of it's fleet WAVs, will still be able to restrict.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Sussex wrote:
But even if the survey leeches were right, a restricting council that has 100% of it's fleet WAVs, will still be able to restrict.

TFFT!!

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14150
Location: Wirral
Quote:
But even if the survey leeches were right, a restricting council that has 100% of it's fleet WAVs, will still be able to restrict


How so if they are 100% of a particular type of vehicle, albeit WAV's :?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8522
I seem to remember a few years ago.. that unions and national associations met with the 0FT... they went back to their members telling them that the meetings were just fine... oh did they have egg on their faces when the final report came out..

what people need to Remember is that when the Act is in place it is in place.... and if certain people within the Ministry of Transport changed their minds then the cab trade is well and truly shafted..... we all know that we can trust our Government can't we....

will you look at that.... a flying pig... :oops:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14150
Location: Wirral
Quote:
will you look at that.... a flying pig... :oops:


Well I hope it's wheelchair accessible and has the appropriate licence :D

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8522
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
MR T wrote:
I have had conversations with two of the major survey companies just recently and I asked them what their opinion was of the Department for Transport's plan to use three areas to trial their idea of percentages.................. strangely enough they said it would be impossible to formulate a percentage across the country by using this method.... so if it ends up with no percentage of the fleet being required.... you will simply have a Act that will State.... councils will not be able to refuse a licence to Anyone that provides a wheelchair accessible vehicle...........

Even if they are already 100% WAV & have a no issue of HCVL policy, because a recent survey has confirmed NSUD?

Surely not?

But if so, then we are all quadruple f*cked!!!
The key point to remember is that they want to get the Act passed..... and then put together the exemptions and percentages....... it a bit like building a house and then drawing the plans....

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 760 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 51  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group