Doom wrote:
I've experienced deregulation, I've seen what it does, it just makes a mess of things, controlled growth however subject to demand and future demand after survey isn't such a bad idea, but it can only work if the council comes down hard on pirating PHD's to start with, and also PH companies should also be investigated to show they have enough work for the number of cars they are employing, standards have to improve as well, it's no good having drivers out there who don't know the basics of the road, how many times do you see a cab on the wrong side of the road with it's headlights blinding oncoming traffic, of a local one at the station, they park and wait on the mini roundabout blocking it up, of course when the rail staff see it they blame the taxis, where the blame is the PH, one thing I agree with the likes of Sussex is the plate baron thing, it's a liberty that one man should turn himself into a bus company, the idea of the job is that you drive the taxi you licenced, enforce this and you rid yourself of barons, deregulating only encourages barons, players who will risk bank money and take profit if it's there, and shrug their shoulders and default on the loan if it isn't, which is like betting with a bookie who gives you your stake back on all losing bets.
Some interesting points but I disagree with swathes of it.
Controlled growth creates a further demand for plates, as you pointed out above with the Nationwide Building Society scenario.
Why, in a free market should a PH company show it has any work?
Its subscribers, if making no money will surely move circuits.
On driving standards, it is the job of the people that license us to ensure we are of a high standard.
In respect of barons, I think you and sussex are equally incorrect, my experience is that people who aquire plates in this country have a common interest to ensure people actually make a living, nobody will rent a cab if they cannot afford it or dont make enough money.
CC