Well who knows, Heathcote - I think that's basically what the legacy opertators are trying to work out with HMRC, hence the joint statement above
But worth going back to the article by Eazitax in PHTM a year ago now:
In February 2024 Eazitax wrote:
Although private and public hire are
longstanding trades, in recent years, more and
more people have opted for flexible work such
as ridesharing and food delivery. This is referred
to in the media as the ‘gig economy.’
So, governments have had to address tax
challenges posed by this kind of work. The UK
government has introduced new legislation that
requires ‘online platforms’ to directly report the
income details of their sellers (drivers in this
case) to HMRC.[...]
Let’s explore this legislation’s impact on drivers
and the platforms they work for.
HMRC mandates that digital platforms
operating in the UK must report income details
of their sellers to HMRC. This information
includes earnings, the number of journeys or
deliveries completed and expenses incurred by
the drivers. This legislation aims to improve tax
compliance in the gig economy, ensuring
drivers pay the right amount of tax on their
income. However, this is only for what’s called a
digital platform, not necessarily private hire
operators.
In February 2024 Eazitax wrote:
• Most of the platforms covered by the new legislation are open marketplaces that match sellers to buyers. Examples are Booking.com, eBay, Etsy as well as ridesharing apps such Uber, Bolt, OLA and Freenow.
• Private hire tech exists in a different space because it pairs operators with drivers, who are already regulated through their relationship with the licensing authority.
So all that's just the usual thing about portraying 'ride-sharing' apps and the gig economy as something new, whereas in my opinion it's just an evolution from what went before. In particular, check out the final paragraph above, which makes it sound like the 'ridesharing apps' aren't even licensed, and to that extent it's all very different
But - and what I've been saying for about a decade now - apart from the fact that Uber and Bolt et al are app-only and non-cash, what's the real difference between them and the legacy operators?
None that I can see. But if a legacy operator does app-bookings and/or automated payments, does that mean it counts as a digital platform, for part or all of its work?
Can't be bothered looking into the actual 'digital platform' definition in the new legislation, but I suspect my question in the paragraph above is the essence of what LPHCA, NPHTA and Eazitax are trying to thrash out with HMRC
