Can't recall if it was Sheffield, or another local authority, but this has certainly been discussed on here before.
(And the Sheffield card reads very like one I've read in the past few months, but can't recall if it was Sheffield or another authority - there are certainly others who have a similar rule.)
But, and correct me if I'm wrong, what it basically means is that there is no difference between in-area and cross-border fares - the optional agreed fare (it says above that drivers
may agree a cross-border fare) - is little more than an estimate if it's more than meter, or an agreed fare only if it's below meter.
So if the meter shows less than the 'estimate' for a cross-border fare, then the driver can only charge the metered fare.
If the meter shows more than the 'estimate' for a cross-border run, then the driver can only charge the 'estimate'.
So, basically, Sheffield is saying that in contractual terms you can only 'agree' a cross-border fare if it's less than meter, and if it's more than meter then it's simply an 'estimate', and you can't actually charge it.
Thus it's the same as someone asking for an agreed fare for a run in-area
Which begs the question, what is the point of the legislative provision on cross-border runs referred to if Sheffield's application of it simply means that there's no difference between in-area and cross-border runs as far as fare regulation is concerned?
But, as I think Sussex and others have said previously, the answer is basically that Sheffield isn't complying with the legislation
