Tom Thumb wrote:
Wharfie.
History tells that the Private Hire industry emerged because of two things.
1) The restrictive market policies introduced for the Hackney industry
2) The desire to provide a service avoiding the restrictive and excessively high entry barriers in place.
Rugby League and Rugby Union have different rules but to a martian from Planet Zog they are the same game.
They have the same objectives, scoring a try, the same playing field and to a huge extent the same rules.
They have also benefited hugely from cross fertilisation of ideas and personnel.
Still gone off track here, but it is a relevant comparison.
What I am saying is that, as far as I am concerned, Private Hire emerged because of the restrictive practices. It's reputation today is solely down to the London hackney trade who for many many years blocked its official recognition. Remember the trade only had any legislation in 1976 and that was deemed so insignificant it was a small part of 'Miscellaneous Provisions'.
If the trade as a whole had had innovative all encompassing legislation in the 60's and a large part hadn't been treated like lepers in our capital then we would be in a very differnet position.
That poster the London Hacks put up about how many rapes, attacks etc had taken place in minicabs should have had written boldly across the bottom
And the negative attitude of London Hackney drivers is responsible because we stopped every effort to licence the trade
That is history rewritten, but not true at all
Private hire arose out of a desire to use fleets from funerals and weddings
it developed on from there to competition on those fronts and a very cheap buisness set up.
licensing was introduced after concern over rapes and children disapearing
in fact it was to dodge licensing!
tom tut tut