TDO wrote:
TornCasualty wrote:
By the way, if you do want to get involved with semantics, your paragraph above is totally contradictory - first you claim that I'm factually correct, then you say that something indicates otherwise.
Make up your mind
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/lol.gif)
Semantics again but here goes.
Your statement that the directors of a company don't necessarily own the company is correct, what I then went on to state was that you could draw your own conclusions from the fact that the registered office was also the directors home address. Whilst possibly they don't own the company, in the real world it's highly unlikely - even you have to admit that.
David Coutts controlled Festival and quite possibly still does. However the hoops he jumps through to avoid legislation yet remain barely legal is well known in Scotland, and announcing his quitting as boss a nice, yet obvious move. His last little licensing avoidance scheme being the running of a bar in Edinburgh which masqueraded as a restaurant with an alcohol license rather than a bar. It closed down and then the company changed it's name when it took ownership of a private hire company in Edinburgh (As advertised in a full colour advert in the Edinburgh Evening News of 18 April 2006, which surprisingly enough featured a prominent local councillor). A private hire car company masquerading as a cab company. Spot the similarities...........
As I said before - where's JT with his corruption cries when you need them
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/lol.gif)