toots wrote:
I've changed my mind I'm not going to pm it I'm just going to post
Quote:
Toots. I think you like playing the victim
I'm not a victim, never have been and never will be. The man in question was just a bully.
Quote:
That “cruel and insensitive man” your abuser, you know, the father of your children
You're wrong it wasn't the father of my children. The father of my children was a lot of things but a wife beater he was not.
Quote:
Poor little Toots, springs to mind
That's one thing I'm not. I am more than capable of taking care of myself and your sarcastic false concern isn't needed. It was not my intention for people to feel sorry for me, but, for people to see how you speak before you think
Quote:
wee lassies being raped because they can't hail a cab
there is no evidence to suggest that wee lassies are raped anymore so in restricted areas than in de-restricted areas. In fact only last week they announced that the only crime that didn't show a significant decrease in England were sex crimes. There are loads of de-restricted councils in England
Quote:
You see that's the difference between me and your ex abuser, Toots. I think you would use any tactic to elevate your perceived status
This is a forum were people are able to express views freely and usually without insults, except in the case of the threads posted by yourself and jasbar. You just don't seem to be able to express an opinion and debate with a cool clear head. I don't have a perceived status, I don't need a perceived status and I certainly don't need to elevate myself, that is something you do.
Quote:
Personally, I think everything you write on this forum is a therapy session.
Perhaps it is for you but not for me. I don't need therapy
Quote:
It wasn't a flippant comment, Toots.
Oh I see. It was a serious comment and obviously meant to wound. Why would you do that, why would you want to do that to somebody you thought had low self esteem if it wasn't for the sole purpose to verbally bully them into submission and get them to shut up.
Three things.
First,
"Little Princess meets Little Princess". So you're not the butch lesbian that you come over as then
Second
"This is a forum were people are able to express views freely and usually without insults, except in the case of the threads posted by yourself and jasbar. You just don't seem to be able to express an opinion and debate with a cool clear head."
Perhaps because we realise that the trade is structured so badly and it is so riddled with vested interests which have no regard for decency and fairness.
You see toots, the tone of our posts is because we despise you for being the stupid bewildered subservient fools that you are.
Before I came into this trade I had no contact with taxi owners, drivers, cops, lawyers, politicians or councillors. I had no opinion about any of them. Now I hold them all in poor regard as intrinsically morally bankrupt, dishonest even and certainly self serving.
All we do is express our disgust at such dishonesty.
Third, and most seriously,
"wee lassies being raped because they can't hail a cab
there is no evidence to suggest that wee lassies are raped anymore so in restricted areas than in de-restricted areas. In fact only last week they announced that the only crime that didn't show a significant decrease in England were sex crimes. There are loads of de-restricted councils in England "
By your own admission crime is falling, but not in sex crimes. yet you would not take steps to minimise the risk for the public of such sex crimes because you put you own self interest first.
Toots that is simply despicable.
No council can claim to be protecting public safety unless and until it has done everything it can to protect public safety.
How can restricting taxis, creating an artificial shortage of supply, encouraging people to get into unlicensed vehicles, clearly warned by the government's BPG and ignored by the council,possibly be construed as protecting public safety?
You need to take a look at yourself. Wee lassies risk harm because you want to protect your vested intrest.
This debate on restriction or not is simply childish. Restriction is holding the trade back because of the mindset of selfishness it creates. It's long overdue for the trade to grow up, operate like every other market sector and move on.
And, if as you say there are lots of derestricted areas, around 75%, then why shouldn't Edinburgh be derestricted. Why should I have to operate at a disadvantage when compared with other areas? How is that observing my Human Rights?
