Sussex wrote:
So if you had proper enforcement, and stiffer age limits for PH, your problems would be solved?

That would be a good start. Then we would have to get some action on illegal parking of all vehicles other than taxis on taxi ranks. No one cares a Flying F*** about that in Birmingham. No enforcement there either, even by traffic wardens, that have now been renamed as Civil Enforcement Officers.
We also have Street Wardens in Birmingham too. They look really lovely in their royal blue uniforms.
But I think to get somewhere with taxi enforcement in Birmingham, the staffing levels in the HC & PH Enforcement Office would have to be at least quadrupled to start having any effect; probably an extra 20 bodies or so.
Nottingham did a unque thing in about August 2006. They employed two new enforcement officers. And guess what? Their terms of employment were that they would work NIGHT ONLY. Dedicated night enforcement; now that is a step in the right direction.
The government & also the Institute of Licensing, amongst others, are talking more & more about what they are now calling 'The Night Time Economy' & are recognising that since the Licensing Act 2003, new problems & issues have emerged because of this Act.
Surely therefore, it is reasonable for taxi trade representative bodies throughout the country to approach their licensing committees & ask to have dedicated night working only enforcement officers, so that these problems & issues start to be addressed.
After all the licensing fund should be used for all matters licensing including enforcement, so in effect its our money.
Perhaps, just perhaps it might be better to pay increased licensing fees to pay for better enforcement. After all everything has to be paid for in life including enforcement. Would an extra £2, £3 or £4 a week in fees bring a return of an extra £5, £10 or £20 a day in earnings if enforcement was at the level it should be?
I don't know, but how else are we to tackle LA enforcement departments to try to get better enforcement?