Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat Apr 25, 2026 9:28 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
"The PCO categorically rejects any suggestion that it is working against the Mayor. Certain elements within the taxi trade made the same accusations against the PCO under the previous Mayor - such accusations were, and still are, completely unfounded.



Namely the pensioner's association from SE1.

Never a more truthful release from the PCO. =D>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:53 am
Posts: 160
Location: London Licensed Taxi driver
Sussex wrote:
London Jim wrote:
WE do not want to by put in the same basket as Private hire.

You are being put into the same bucket as everyone else is, the law applies to hackneys as much as it does for PH.

we got no argument with that, your twisting whats been said

_________________
http://www.fleetway.ca/samples/cab.swf

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SF5ep04izcQ

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2KDLd4gJ ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:53 am
Posts: 160
Location: London Licensed Taxi driver
Sussex wrote:
London Jim wrote:
We do not do the same job.

Other than legally plying and being able to be flagged down what isn't the same?

Both take folks from A to B for payment, and even the radio firms share work with the PH. :?


The line needs to be drawn between the Two services and the shairing of work with PH must stop.

_________________
http://www.fleetway.ca/samples/cab.swf

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SF5ep04izcQ

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2KDLd4gJ ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:53 am
Posts: 160
Location: London Licensed Taxi driver
Sussex wrote:
London Jim wrote:
No one in our trade is sticking up for the handful of Licensed Taxi drivers who tout at the Liver and the one or two that tout at LAP, that's their own look out and no one will miss them when they get caught.

That applies to the vast amount of licensed PH, and every spokes-person for the PH trade that I've ever come across.

Surely the trade, both PH and HC should be thanking Boris from the bottom of their hearts for his one tout and you're out policy.

The mere fact that the PCO sent out one letter instead of two is irrelevant, and to have a pop is farcical.


We all do, thank Boris, no one is having a pop at him for the new law. The PCO should have sent out two letters and they should stop trying to merge us into a one tier trade. it was underhanded. They have set out to merge the two services first under Ken and now under Boris. It has to stop.

_________________
http://www.fleetway.ca/samples/cab.swf

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SF5ep04izcQ

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2KDLd4gJ ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:53 am
Posts: 160
Location: London Licensed Taxi driver
Sussex wrote:
London Jim wrote:

Well now its time to stop talking and start the action.

What because one letter was sent out instead of two? FFS. ](*,)


No because we have had thirty years of no one listening to our grievances.
If they haven't listened by now they aint going to and the only way to make them listen is action now.
I may have only been a cabby for ten years but I come from a long line of Taxi drivers and have listened to their problems, the same ones we have now, because no one was ever prepared to do anything. Including the LTDA and Unite/TGW.
As a Brighton Cab driver you will never apriciate the problems we have to face in London for so long. You don't understand the problem that has been caused by Licensing 45000 PHV drivers. There is not enough work to sustain their numbers and so they have to tout and tout openly they do.
We just want a level playing field and the authorities to do their job Properly. That's all we have ever wanted.
SFU \:D/

_________________
http://www.fleetway.ca/samples/cab.swf

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SF5ep04izcQ

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2KDLd4gJ ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:53 am
Posts: 160
Location: London Licensed Taxi driver
GBC wrote:
Can I just say Grant Davis and the OAP's that go under the banner of the London Cab Drivers Club (LCDC) represent less than 1000 out of over 25'000 drivers.



Yeh and the LTDA has 8000 arrogant, self opinionated nutters like you!
that's what stops the other 17000 from joining up.

Do you think your the only young cabby in town?
I'm probably five years younger than you and your the one talking like a pensioner.
These no way you are a real cab driver, your one of these nutters on forums who like to stir it up.
How come we aint seen any other London cab driver sticking up for you or your stupid statements.

I've Had a Look through some of your old posts and your definitely a trouble maker.
I bet your a mini cab driver trying to be cleaver.

_________________
http://www.fleetway.ca/samples/cab.swf

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SF5ep04izcQ

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2KDLd4gJ ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:53 am
Posts: 160
Location: London Licensed Taxi driver
GBC wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Not afraid to mix their words London's 24,000 black cab drivers are preparing for battle with Boris over a series of snubs and rebukes, Ken learnt to his peril that alienating the black cab fraternity carries a high price.



No we're not.



Who made you spokes person for 25000 cabbies. Your a loner.
Crawl back into your cradle and get a proper job.

_________________
http://www.fleetway.ca/samples/cab.swf

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SF5ep04izcQ

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2KDLd4gJ ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 7:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
skippy41 wrote:
How can a black cab be done for touting??? IE picking up a flag or even if they are stopped and someone wants taking, even if the driver asks a punter if they want a cab

If a taxi driver asks a punter if he wants a cab away from the rank then IMO that's touting.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
London Jim wrote:
Sussex wrote:
London Jim wrote:
WE do not want to by put in the same basket as Private hire.

You are being put into the same bucket as everyone else is, the law applies to hackneys as much as it does for PH.

we got no argument with that, your twisting whats been said

If I'm mistaken I'm deeply apologetic. :wink:

What did you mean then?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 7:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
London Jim wrote:
The line needs to be drawn between the Two services and the shairing of work with PH must stop.

Well that's got nothing to do with the PCO.

Or are you saying a law should be enacted stating PH and HC shouldn't share circuits?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
London Jim wrote:
We are not a bunch of pillocks, you have obviously missed the main point of the grievance. WE do not want to by put in the same basket as Private hire. We are not the same trade. We do not do the same job. This is were the trouble is being caused by PHV drivers who now think they are Taxi drivers.


I don't profess to be an expert on the London taxi trade but if I could make some fair observations regarding comparisons of the job description of a taxi driver no matter where in the country those taxi drivers might be found, then perhaps we might get a little clarity in this thread?

It is an acknowledged fact in most quarters that obtaining the London knowledge is a prestigious accomplishment, however many would say, "that is as far as it goes".

The regulations governing the UK taxi and private hire trade are practically identical throughout the country therefore apart from the London knowledge nothing sets them apart from other UK taxi drivers except perhaps their own individual professionalism?

Touting is catered for in all taxi legislation and that has practically been the case ever since the first London taxi act was enacted. The offence of touting is now part and parcel of the criminal justice act but the offence still resides in historic hackney carriage legislation dating back to the 19th century. I don't have to remind you where it is or what it says because you probably already know and if you don't know, then you can find it on TDO.

The fact that hackney carriage drivers are not private hire drivers is immaterial for the purpose of notification of this offence because the opportunity to transgress the law in this respect is open to anyone employed in the business of hire or reward and I'm afraid that includes all taxi drivers no matter where they are licensed and who they might be?

Passing a difficult knowledge test doesn't exempt you from the law, it merely proves you have the capacity to memorise countless streets and roads and places of importance. The law is the law and it applies to hackney carriage drivers just as much as it does to private hire drivers.

This website is full of hackney carriage case law relating to touting dating back to the 1800's so it is not something that has suddenly surfaced, nor is the concept of private hire, for that was also an accepted activity in the 1800's albeit a legally unlicensed activity.

On a personal note I think the London Taxi trade should take note of what is being proposed here because it is my experience that hackney carriage drivers are just as susceptible to temptation as private hire drivers.

Primarily the acts were intended to regulate or to prevent anyone from touting for hire with an unlicensed hackney carriage but provision was also written into the acts which forbade hackney carriage drivers from doing the same thing by calling out as they drove along and soliciting custom in a way which is incompatible with the general principle of plying for hire.

I suspect there has never been a London cab driver who has illegally picked up a flagger outside of their own licensed area or a yellow badge driver that has never picked up a flagger in a green badge area?

One assumes you wish the law to be applied both equally and fairly therefore if that be the case then informing all London hackney carriage and private hire drivers that breaches of this particular law will not be countenanced would in most peoples minds be the most practical thing to do?

The comments of the driver concerned suggests that the letter should not have been sent to hackney carriage drivers because they have done the knowledge and are incapable of breaking the law relating to touting inside their own area or plying for hire outside their own area. I think that is the wrong attitude to take and in my opinion it shows a complete lack of understanding of the laws relating to touting and illegal plying for hire. Perhaps the London knowledge should include a more in-depth understanding of hackney carriage legislation?

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:53 am
Posts: 160
Location: London Licensed Taxi driver
JD you make very good points and I will do my best to answer them. I am new to forums and probably not making my points clear enough.

We are not complaining about the content of the letter, we agree whole heartedly with this new legislation.
We think that the PCO should have issued two separate letters. But they insist in putting us together as if we are the same trade body, which we clearly are not. Both Boris and Ken before him agreed on that point. This may sound petty to other drivers outside London but it is some thing that the PCO has been insistent on doing ever since TFL took over the PCO from the Met Police.
When the NHS want to change the way it cleans the hospitals it doesn't send the letter addressed to the nurses as well as the cleaners.

We know that it is against the conditions of our license to tout but the Law is not being enforced and has not been enforced properly by any of the authoritive bodies that have the power to uphold this law for many years and has led to a situation where PHV drivers now believe they have the right to tout outside clubs that have a link man outside. That's apart from the ones that just openly tout because they know they can get away with it.
I am not saying either that the Licensed Taxi trade are all angels either and we know that some transgressions happen, but not on the scale we are seeing from the PHV drivers.
This has been a problem for over thirty years and because of the recent increase in the numbers of PHV's it is causing great problems in London and affecting our living.
Yes, some drivers have had to change the way they work and only come out later on in the week and tear the arse out of it for ten- twelve hours when its busy. But this is a short time measure that doesn't suit the majority of drivers and dose not solve the fact that too many PHV drivers are touting on a large scale.

_________________
http://www.fleetway.ca/samples/cab.swf

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SF5ep04izcQ

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2KDLd4gJ ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:53 am
Posts: 160
Location: London Licensed Taxi driver
Sussex wrote:
London Jim wrote:
Sussex wrote:
London Jim wrote:
WE do not want to by put in the same basket as Private hire.

You are being put into the same bucket as everyone else is, the law applies to hackneys as much as it does for PH.

we got no argument with that, your twisting whats been said

If I'm mistaken I'm deeply apologetic. :wink:

What did you mean then?


I point to the answer i gave to JD

Sussex wrote:
London Jim wrote:
The line needs to be drawn between the Two services and the shairing of work with PH must stop.

Well that's got nothing to do with the PCO.

Or are you saying a law should be enacted stating PH and HC shouldn't share circuits?


Yes Iam saying ( in myopinion) just that.
The two should be keeped apart and that includes the radio taxi's that shair their account work with PHV firms.

_________________
http://www.fleetway.ca/samples/cab.swf

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SF5ep04izcQ

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2KDLd4gJ ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Why not get rid of the problem by getting the PCO scraped and insisting that a new body takes over, reading many of the things that they do and some of there daft rules and the fact they wont do anything seems a valid point to get rid of them


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
London Jim wrote:
JD you make very good points and I will do my best to answer them. I am new to forums and probably not making my points clear enough.

We are not complaining about the content of the letter, we agree whole heartedly with this new legislation.

We think that the PCO should have issued two separate letters.


I see, so the only concern you have is that the letter was standard when perhaps it should have been divided into two separate sections, one addressing the private hire trade and the other addressing the hackney carriage trade. Alternately as you say, separate letters to each would have been more appropriate. I don't know the reasoning behind the PCO actions and I haven't seen the actual letter but its contents and standardisation seem to have caused a bit of a furore amongst London Cab drivers.

It is to late to put the genie back in the bottle but perhaps it is not too late to educate the PCO by explaining your concerns in respect of associating London Hackney carriage drivers with London private hire drivers?

Perhaps you can convince the PCO that in future they should have regard for the status of the London hackney carriage trade when embarking on such a process of information as is the case in respect of this letter.

I think we are all fully aware of the impotence most enforcement agencies seem to suffer from when it comes to touting and illegally plying for hire but to be quite honest I cannot see any remedy for that in the near or distant future without new legislation and even then the problem will still exist.


Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 386 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group