Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat Apr 25, 2026 1:55 am

Board index » General » Licensing and legal

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
charles007
 Post subject: JD
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
DO YOU HAVE THE CASE FROM STOCKPORT 2008 WERE THE COUNCIL WAS ORDERED TO ISSUE PLATES.

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject: Re: JD
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
charles007 wrote:
DO YOU HAVE THE CASE FROM STOCKPORT 2008 WERE THE COUNCIL WAS ORDERED TO ISSUE PLATES.


The case is on here somewhere Charles and I do indeed have such a case. We try and put all relavent case law on TDO.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
The case you are on about Charles was only ever published in case digest format because there was no actual case and I can't find it. lol

The case digest just reiterated the facts whereby the study of the MORI questionnaire did not amount to a measuring of demand, therefore Stockport were not in possesion of demand and had no legal right to refuse the licenses. That is it in a nutshell.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
JD wrote:
The case you are on about Charles was only ever published in case digest format because there was no actual case and I can't find it. lol

The case digest just reiterated the facts whereby the study of the MORI questionnaire did not amount to a measuring of demand, therefore Stockport were not in possesion of demand and had no legal right to refuse the licenses. That is it in a nutshell.

Regards

JD


Thats going to be a bit out of character when he explains it to soda :wink:

regards

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:
JD wrote:
The case you are on about Charles was only ever published in case digest format because there was no actual case and I can't find it. lol

The case digest just reiterated the facts whereby the study of the MORI questionnaire did not amount to a measuring of demand, therefore Stockport were not in possesion of demand and had no legal right to refuse the licenses. That is it in a nutshell.

Regards

JD


Thats going to be a bit out of character when he explains it to soda :wink:

regards

CC


The only conclusion one can draw is that the case was decided in chambers probably after legal argument and the announcement in court of the reasons for allowing the appeal, was just a formality.

I think thats about the top and bottom of it.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
JD wrote:

The only conclusion one can draw is that the case was decided in chambers probably after legal argument and the announcement in court of the reasons for allowing the appeal, was just a formality.

I think thats about the top and bottom of it.

Regards

JD


I thought i saw something on the stockport council website?

regards

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:


I thought i saw something on the stockport council website?

regards

CC


I'm sure sussex posted something about it as well.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=9968&highlight=mori

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject: Re: JD
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57331
Location: 1066 Country
charles007 wrote:
DO YOU HAVE THE CASE FROM STOCKPORT 2008 WERE THE COUNCIL WAS ORDERED TO ISSUE PLATES.

This thread dealt with the outcome.

http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=9968

But I think it was a case of no proper SUD evidence, thus no defence, thus plates must be issued.

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject: Re: JD
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Sussex wrote:
charles007 wrote:
DO YOU HAVE THE CASE FROM STOCKPORT 2008 WERE THE COUNCIL WAS ORDERED TO ISSUE PLATES.

This thread dealt with the outcome.

http://taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=9968

But I think it was a case of no proper SUD evidence, thus no defence, thus plates must be issued.


I think thats all you are going to get on that matter charles.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject: Re: JD
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
JD wrote:
I think thats all you are going to get on that matter charles.

Regards

JD


Have you taken note of the solicitor involved?

regards

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject: Re: JD
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:
Have you taken note of the solicitor involved?

regards

CC


And the Barrister.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.
Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject: Re: JD
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
JD wrote:

And the Barrister.

Regards

JD


and who's perhaps going to act for the 'trade'?

Regards

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject: Re: JD
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57331
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
and who's perhaps going to act for the 'trade'?

Define the trade? :?

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject: Re: JD
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
Define the trade? :?


Those brave fellows with Hansom carriages :wink:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » General » Licensing and legal

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1352 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group