|
Once again a metamorphosis is claimed for fasties by the erstwhile Gladrags.
Once again he claims to have nothing to do with it.
(Haven't we heard all of this before?)
Once again the alter ego has allegedly been killed off.
Doesn't this Edinburgh based taxi forum have more lives than Dr Who?
Haven't more fasties gurus been killed off than villains in Eastenders?
But, and isn't this the nub of it, does anyone really care?
That forum has never been one for real debate. It has long been just the vehicle for Gladrags to vent his skewed and biased view of all things taxis, his slavish protection of a system that has failed the trade and the market it would serve because of its corruption and greed - at the expense of those who actually do the work driving the taxis.
But, if he is to truly take a back seat, then good riddance.
Because, in his time Gladrags has never been right about anything.
He was wrong with his views of taxi ettiquette where he expected deference to any taxi ranking unofficially in any street.
He was wrong in his failure to address dress code enforcement, stop and search with passengers on board, the forced, expensive and unnecessary replacement of Fairway taxis etc.
He was wrong in his opposition to new vehicle types, which have proved so popular they now form a significant part of the fleet.
He was wrong in his support of taxi tariff hikes - 7% hike at a time when the country is in recession and everyone is pulling in their belt - we've all seen the effect on earnings during the Christmas period and since.
He was wrong in his belief that the HCLCG should meet in secret, we've all seen how it has failed to address the interests of real workers in the trade where decisions are taken, policies enforced, long before the trade gets a chance to consider them. The reign of vested interest, the rule of the "done deal" - accept it whether you like it or not because it's done and dusted.
He was wrong in his support of the status quo which saw plate "values" and rentals rise while business levels fell.
He was wrong in his acceptance of the exponential increase in private hire because it allowed restriction of taxis and plate "values" and rentals to rise through the demand caused by the shortage. A dangerous concept which has allowed a powerful less regulated competitor to take our work and, now that it has been joined by the Rat, to try to take company contracts which will affect every taxi driver - streetcar or taxi company.
There's more, but I guess we've all got the point.
If the defection of the Rat has shown anything, those who have their vice-like grip on control of the taxi trade are destroying it. Gladrags aided and abetted them in their greed and exerting of that control, massaging the egos of those who exercise control of the trade, as well the council.
Gladrags' biggest failure was his inability to moderate his forum fairly. Because it served only as his vehicle to promote the status quo, opposing views were allowed to be clouded and subsumed by the intellectual dwarves whose actions drove it into the gutter in a hail of personal abuse. Gladrags only "moderated" the side of the argument he disagreed with.
We all remember Torn Casualty, Wellkentface, Cablag and a host of other intellectual nonentities who kept reinventing new banale pseudonyms, most of whom were so proud of their views and opinions, so assured that they were right that they hid behind the veil of anonymity. And, wasn't their inane, childish spoutings little more than a monument to their crass stupidity and cowardice.
After its inception, and it could have been a good idea, Fasties very soon became not fit for purpose.
It's passing, if it truly has passed, is to be celebrated.
As for the new forum? Well, any forum that is intent on banning people from the outset shows that it's coat is already on the intellectual shaky nail.
As a means of disseminating information relevant to the taxi trade, should it be operated along the same lines as Fasties, with the same lack of objectivity, with the same adherence only to the status quo and manic promotion of it, it will have little practical value.
That being so, the question is, why bother?
_________________ Skull, "You are a police inspector, aren't you?" Cab Inspector Smith, "Yes." Skull, "So, are you going to tell Mr Taylor what his rights are?" Smith, "And ... What rights?"
|