Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 9:12 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 4:13 pm
Posts: 298
Location: Paisley
STOP PRESS !

Following a meeting of Renfrewshire Council Regulatory Fu(ck)ntions Board, Sneddon has been given 8 weeks to get WAV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:04 am
Posts: 507
[quote="Paisley Buddie"]STOP PRESS !

Following a meeting of Renfrewshire Council Regulatory Fu(ck)ntions Board, Sneddon has been given 8 weeks to get WAV[/quote]

The disability legislation going through westminster at the moment will kill of any doubts here.

It is expected to recommend taht all coucils stipulate WAVs
And any council who does not have 100% WAVs will not be able to restrict numbers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Frank Lay wrote:
Paisley Buddie wrote:
STOP PRESS !

Following a meeting of Renfrewshire Council Regulatory Fu(ck)ntions Board, Sneddon has been given 8 weeks to get WAV


The disability legislation going through westminster at the moment will kill of any doubts here.

It is expected to recommend taht all coucils stipulate WAVs
And any council who does not have 100% WAVs will not be able to restrict numbers.


It also stipulates that all disabilities must be catered for so saloons could be licenced as hacks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:47 pm
Posts: 595
Location: Lower Highlands
skippy41 wrote:
Frank Lay wrote:
Paisley Buddie wrote:
STOP PRESS !

Following a meeting of Renfrewshire Council Regulatory Fu(ck)ntions Board, Sneddon has been given 8 weeks to get WAV


The disability legislation going through westminster at the moment will kill of any doubts here.

It is expected to recommend taht all coucils stipulate WAVs
And any council who does not have 100% WAVs will not be able to restrict numbers.


It also stipulates that all disabilities must be catered for so saloons could be licenced as hacks


Can you hear me Major Tom........... :-({|=


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:04 am
Posts: 507
I think you will find that this legislation from Westminster changes everything.

Any decicion made in a court in the past will be irrellevant.
The courts have to APPLY the law, and not MAKE the law.

It is WHEELCHAIR accessable vehicles they are talking about, and not disability friendly.

NO WAV RULE, THEN NO RESTRICTION ON NUMBERS

As this could be seen as a penalty, 100% wav could be seen as an instruction from parliament and so turns this ruling on its head.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
Frank Lay wrote:
I think you will find that this legislation from Westminster changes everything.

Any decicion made in a court in the past will be irrellevant.
The courts have to APPLY the law, and not MAKE the law.

It is WHEELCHAIR accessable vehicles they are talking about, and not disability friendly.

NO WAV RULE, THEN NO RESTRICTION ON NUMBERS

As this could be seen as a penalty, 100% wav could be seen as an instruction from parliament and so turns this ruling on its head.


Frank, you could be right, but not in the way you think, 100% wav could be seen as a requirement and not an instruction - equal opportunities and all that . . .




:shock:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:04 am
Posts: 507
Gary,

I wont argue about a word with you.
But we both know what the outcome will be.

Some councils will have to choose between NOT being 100% WAV and having restricted numbers. They will not be able to have it both ways.


At least Edinburgh is 100% WAV and so is Ok.
But some difficult decisions for some.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
The Equality bill is new legislation, not taken into account in this judgement.
If new legislation requires changes, old court cases like this will not apply.
New law can change the validity of an old judgement..............

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
gusmac wrote:
The Equality bill is new legislation, not taken into account in this judgement.
If new legislation requires changes, old court cases like this will not apply.
New law can change the validity of an old judgement..............
And that's for sure :wink:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
Frank Lay wrote:
Gary,

I wont argue about a word with you.
But we both know what the outcome will be.

Some councils will have to choose between NOT being 100% WAV and having restricted numbers. They will not be able to have it both ways.


At least Edinburgh is 100% WAV and so is Ok.
But some difficult decisions for some.


Frank, if I am willing to put on a WAV, then why should I be denied? No instruction, merely a requirement, that I am prepared to fulfil.

On what grounds, should I be denied the opportunity to put on such a vehicle?

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
gusmac wrote:
The Equality bill is new legislation, not taken into account in this judgement.
If new legislation requires changes, old court cases like this will not apply.
New law can change the validity of an old judgement..............


How right you are . .. :D Quality gusmac, quality . . .


:D

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 724 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group