Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 10:40 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 208 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Skull wrote:

I think it is obvious to everyone you are not a well man Dougie. :roll:


Thats nice coming from an aids victim :lol:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
Private Reggie wrote:
Skull wrote:
Private Reggie wrote:
Skull wrote:
Dougie, why would the council be interested in the old B&Q at Stevenson, as a Vehicle Testing Centre? :shock:

The above information came from an interesting source. I was wondering if anyone knows anything?

:wink:

I've heard too!!! The council are seriously considering increasing the New Apps Fee to around the £40,000 mark, (a Labour councillor is taking the credit) This primarily is to restrict in another way the flow of plates but also allow the council to generate enough income to provide the Trade with a new Vehicle testing centre, of which you do agree is needed.

The site for this i heard could either be stevenson or gogar, this would then allow for the creation of a testing vehicle centre to cover all forms of current public transport excluding trams, meaning the Vehicles tested will include buses as well as Taxi's, Phc and maybe even emergency vehicles, if the centre is sited at gogar, trams will be included.

The vehicle testing centre will include many facilities including Steam cleaning ect.

£40,000 new apps fee is a carrott dangled too cec!!! so how much of a carrott do you feel being a part of the council grabbing such a Carrott :lol: :lol:



I think it is obvious to everyone you are not a well man Dougie. :roll:
You asked the question :D If i'm wrong i will put my hands up :wink: Will you :?:

Eric Barrie :?:


So you pay 40K, to apply for a license. Oh and let's not forget the council still owns the plate.

Oh and Dougie, Eric Barry is one of the biggest fannies ever to walk the earth. This man was born a fanny, and he'll die a fanny.

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 12:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
captain cab wrote:
Skull wrote:

It's okay to drive for someone, but you just can't earn a living driving your own Taxi? Who are you trying to kid CC?

Your argument is all about vested interests running the trade for their own benefit and feck the drivers.

:roll:


Oh and it's not "deregulation". :roll:


Errm its got everything to do with deregulation.......but dont take my word for it, when every other deregulated area is suffering the same way.

But then, you dont give a sh*t.

CC


It's not de-regulation. No one is suggesting doing away with regulation. If anything, we want more regulation in the form of quality controls, to control entry into the trade.

This is why we call it's called de-restriction.



:roll:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Skull wrote:

It's not de-regulation. No one is suggesting doing away with regulation. If anything, we want more regulation in the form of quality controls, to control entry into the trade.

This is why we call it's called de-restriction.


Yeah you call it what you want bud. Call it errm happytimeswehavemorecabstoserve it is still deregulation, in spite of what you call it.

You dont have quality, thats the problem, because my kind of quality, is possibly different to yours and of course vice-verse.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
Private Reggie wrote:
Skull wrote:
Dougie, why would the council be interested in the old B&Q at Stevenson, as a Vehicle Testing Centre? :shock:

The above information came from an interesting source. I was wondering if anyone knows anything?

:wink:

I've heard too!!! The council are seriously considering increasing the New Apps Fee to around the £40,000 mark, (a Labour councillor is taking the credit) This primarily is to restrict in another way the flow of plates but also allow the council to generate enough income to provide the Trade with a new Vehicle testing centre, of which you do agree is needed.

The site for this i heard could either be stevenson or gogar, this would then allow for the creation of a testing vehicle centre to cover all forms of current public transport excluding trams, meaning the Vehicles tested will include buses as well as Taxi's, Phc and maybe even emergency vehicles, if the centre is sited at gogar, trams will be included.

The vehicle testing centre will include many facilities including Steam cleaning ect.

£40,000 new apps fee is a carrott dangled too cec!!! so how much of a carrott do you feel being a part of the council grabbing such a Carrott :lol: :lol:

Dougie Dougie Dougie

councilors talk crap there not qualified to give an accurate opinion on anything,your just one of those guys that wants to believe what your told,you relinquish control to others whom you see as being superior to you(councilors etc)not a hard task i must admit.
in short Dougie your are one of those forelock tugging morons that skull is talking about

but you've been told that your model requires a change in legislation,and you still cant get your little head round it,who cares carry on,if it ever came to this madness being introduced then i would simply go get tested elsewhere,and pay a nominal fee to the council for many more plates.
you just done get what is required buy a local authority Dougie,I'm not saying that the council cant introduce what they want ,god knows they come up with some nonsense up and down the country,it only works if they have the compliance of idiots ,but when its challenge its found wanting,and i think you'll find that it would be challenged don't you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
Private Reggie wrote:
Skull wrote:
Dougie, why would the council be interested in the old B&Q at Stevenson, as a Vehicle Testing Centre? :shock:

The above information came from an interesting source. I was wondering if anyone knows anything?

:wink:

I've heard too!!! The council are seriously considering increasing the New Apps Fee to around the £40,000 mark, (a Labour councillor is taking the credit) This primarily is to restrict in another way the flow of plates but also allow the council to generate enough income to provide the Trade with a new Vehicle testing centre, of which you do agree is needed.

The site for this i heard could either be stevenson or gogar, this would then allow for the creation of a testing vehicle centre to cover all forms of current public transport excluding trams, meaning the Vehicles tested will include buses as well as Taxi's, Phc and maybe even emergency vehicles, if the centre is sited at gogar, trams will be included.

The vehicle testing centre will include many facilities including Steam cleaning ect.

£40,000 new apps fee is a carrott dangled too cec!!! so how much of a carrott do you feel being a part of the council grabbing such a Carrott :lol: :lol:
lets get this right dougie there will be a massive test centre that does all public transport testing for the whole region ?
that makes sense to me

the bit that doesnt make sense is why the taxi trade would pay for it ?

are we to pay for the fuel for lrt's buses there drivers wages,premises for tuk tuks ,radio dues for phc's
why don't all us taxi drivers get down once a week and wash the competitions cars and buses and we'll pay them for doing it
this is precisely why idiots like you should shut the feck up,you would skin us all alive for the sake of your little illusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:04 am
Posts: 507
It makes perfect sense for the council to charge the market value for a new plate, If they are able to be sold on then that is perfectly fair.

As for any new test centre, a company the size of lrt tests on their own premises. Smaller companies use Livingston for tests, driving tests etc.
So there is no need for somewhere else in the area for buses.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:04 pm
Posts: 2859
Location: SCOTLAND
Do you not think once cab direct have got there e7 operating in all the major cities that the will not take councils to court so they can have there European whole type approved rear loading vehicles such as the maxi,Peugeot partner getting approved. :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
and anyway Dougie what makes you think we need a new testing station and what makes you think it would cost anymore to run new premises than it did the old premises.

your a complete clot Dougie.

if they tried to do it that way they would fail,if there management of premises/finances etc is that bad that they needed to charge £40k per application then i think the auditor would need to be having a wee look at them don't you.

your as desperate as they come with this nonsense.
oh btw your not privy to council secrets Dougie,your being used,they new you would talk :wink: ,and they have no intention of implementing any of this nonsense ,there gathering info not giving it away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
Frank Lay wrote:
It makes perfect sense for the council to charge the market value for a new plate, If they are able to be sold on then that is perfectly fair.

As for any new test centre, a company the size of lrt tests on their own premises. Smaller companies use Livingston for tests, driving tests etc.
So there is no need for somewhere else in the area for buses.

yes but the market value is zero.
just ask the council.and the courts.

its only worth what someone is willing to pay for it.

the council cannot make a profit from licenses fee's period !!!

this idea's a non starter unless someone can prove different


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:04 pm
Posts: 2859
Location: SCOTLAND
you have been warned http://www.cabdirect.com/vehicles/peugeot_premier/

European whole type approved £12,500 plus vat


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
you know your talking to the edinburgh taxi trade when they think £40k is a good price for a steam clean :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:04 pm
Posts: 2859
Location: SCOTLAND
you can bury your heads in a cloud but i can guarantee you will come down with one hell off a bump :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:03 am
Posts: 486
Location: dundee land of many plates
i dont understand how dundee council can pass a rear loading wav when it has already banned another one(doblo)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:04 pm
Posts: 2859
Location: SCOTLAND
dundee wav wrote:
i dont understand how dundee council can pass a rear loading wav when it has already banned another one(doblo)


Dundee did not ban the Doblo they made a condition that all new licences would have to be European whole type approval.The Peugeot has this type of approval. At £12,500 plus vat i think you will see a reduction of ph and an increase in hacks which means even less rank space. Were doomed :sad:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 208 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 702 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group