Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 8:55 am

Board index » General » News

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
cabbyman
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Hampshire (HC)
Haven't they?
Top
 Profile  
 
cabbyman
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 7:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Hampshire (HC)
Deleted....double post.
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
cabbyman wrote:
Haven't they?

David James, defending, told the court his client had been a taxi driver for seven years and this was the first time he had been guilty of illegally plying for hire.

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
bloodnock
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
Sussex wrote:
cabbyman wrote:
Haven't they?

David James, defending, told the court his client had been a taxi driver for seven years and this was the first time he had been guilty of illegally plying for hire.



If even the legal eagles cant tell differance a PH and Taxi driver then I guess thats a bit of problem when it comes to stop those naughty PHs from breaking the rules they operate by.. :roll:
Top
 Profile  
 
cabbyman
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Hampshire (HC)
Sussex wrote:
cabbyman wrote:
Haven't they?

David James, defending, told the court his client had been a taxi driver for seven years and this was the first time he had been guilty of illegally plying for hire.


First time he had been guilty, not the first time he had been in court!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Sussex
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
cabbyman wrote:
Sussex wrote:
cabbyman wrote:
Haven't they?

David James, defending, told the court his client had been a taxi driver for seven years and this was the first time he had been guilty of illegally plying for hire.


First time he had been guilty, not the first time he had been in court!!

But he is being reviewed due to his recent court appearance. If he was a regular then he shouldn't have been issued a license in the first place.

_________________
IDFIMH
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » General » News

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 565 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group