Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 2:53 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 2665
stationtone wrote:
Have you Edinburgh guys ever sat around the table to discuss your grievances.Its all good giving out advice but try practicing what you preach.
And when you have sorted out your problems come to Dundee and show us how it is done. :D


An attempt was made. But failed through inexperience.

A bit like a train being cancelled because of the wrong kind of snow on the line.

_________________
Skull, "You are a police inspector, aren't you?"
Cab Inspector Smith, "Yes."
Skull, "So, are you going to tell Mr Taylor what his rights are?"
Smith, "And ... What rights?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:04 am
Posts: 507
That should read,

"No one would agree with jimmy boy (except gary)"

They must be all inexperienced idiots!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
You really should learn to understand what it is your reading and what it is intended for.... the best practice guidelines you're quoting are in fact warning councils about their licensing procedures... in other words telling them not to be over-zealous..ie If they are refusing a driver a licence because he has three points... or he must have a blue vehicle, the issue regarding a council being able to restrict is dealt with separately and quite clearly. your arguments would be laughed out of a court...But what's new there..

Section 8 stated:

Licensing requirements which are unduly stringent will tend unreasonably to restrict the supply of taxi and PHC services, by putting up the cost of operation or otherwise restricting entry to the trade.


Oh and obviously they go totally against tighter controls which you say should be in place... :shock:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
MR T wrote:
You really should learn to understand what it is your reading and what it is intended for.... the best practice guidelines you're quoting are in fact warning councils about their licensing procedures... in other words telling them not to be over-zealous..ie If they are refusing a driver a licence because he has three points... or he must have a blue vehicle, the issue regarding a council being able to restrict is dealt with separately and quite clearly. your arguments would be laughed out of a court...But what's new there..

Section 8 stated:

Licensing requirements which are unduly stringent will tend unreasonably to restrict the supply of taxi and PHC services, by putting up the cost of operation or otherwise restricting entry to the trade.


Oh and obviously they go totally against tighter controls which you say should be in place... :shock:



Aye right Mr. T and of course your definition comes with artificial plate values. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Women's safety doesn't even enter into your thinking :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Time for you to join CC, I think :roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
stationtone wrote:
Have you Edinburgh guys ever sat around the table to discuss your grievances.Its all good giving out advice but try practicing what you preach.
And when you have sorted out your problems come to Dundee and show us how it is done. :D


Artificial plate values divide the trade in Edinburgh, and give away control to the council. You don't have any plate values, but yet you still can't organise yourself into a cohesive group to represent your own interests.

Through here the problem is self-interest and greed. What's your excuse?

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Skull wrote:
MR T wrote:
You really should learn to understand what it is your reading and what it is intended for.... the best practice guidelines you're quoting are in fact warning councils about their licensing procedures... in other words telling them not to be over-zealous..ie If they are refusing a driver a licence because he has three points... or he must have a blue vehicle, the issue regarding a council being able to restrict is dealt with separately and quite clearly. your arguments would be laughed out of a court...But what's new there..

Section 8 stated:

Licensing requirements which are unduly stringent will tend unreasonably to restrict the supply of taxi and PHC services, by putting up the cost of operation or otherwise restricting entry to the trade.


Oh and obviously they go totally against tighter controls which you say should be in place... :shock:



Aye right Mr. T and of course your definition comes with artificial plate values. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Women's safety doesn't even enter into your thinking :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Time for you to join CC, I think :roll: :roll: :roll:
It shows how much you know.... the same legislation applies to the Derestricted areas... and you have to ask yourself why it was put in... maybe because they have cocked up and tried to regain the balance like placing too many restrictions on drivers and vehicles.....

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 2665
So, councils were wrned.

Yet Edinburgh is trying to defend this in court?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Skull, "You are a police inspector, aren't you?"
Cab Inspector Smith, "Yes."
Skull, "So, are you going to tell Mr Taylor what his rights are?"
Smith, "And ... What rights?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Jasbar wrote:
So, councils were wrned.


Wrned?


Image

Good Moaning
:shock:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 2:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 2665
Quality CC. Absolute quality.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Cheers! :lol:

_________________
Skull, "You are a police inspector, aren't you?"
Cab Inspector Smith, "Yes."
Skull, "So, are you going to tell Mr Taylor what his rights are?"
Smith, "And ... What rights?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:38 pm
Posts: 1975
Location: Edinburgh
MR T wrote:
Skull wrote:
MR T wrote:
You really should learn to understand what it is your reading and what it is intended for.... the best practice guidelines you're quoting are in fact warning councils about their licensing procedures... in other words telling them not to be over-zealous..ie If they are refusing a driver a licence because he has three points... or he must have a blue vehicle, the issue regarding a council being able to restrict is dealt with separately and quite clearly. your arguments would be laughed out of a court...But what's new there..

Section 8 stated:

Licensing requirements which are unduly stringent will tend unreasonably to restrict the supply of taxi and PHC services, by putting up the cost of operation or otherwise restricting entry to the trade.


Oh and obviously they go totally against tighter controls which you say should be in place... :shock:



Aye right Mr. T and of course your definition comes with artificial plate values. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Women's safety doesn't even enter into your thinking :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Time for you to join CC, I think :roll: :roll: :roll:
It shows how much you know.... the same legislation applies to the Derestricted areas... and you have to ask yourself why it was put in... maybe because they have cocked up and tried to regain the balance like placing too many restrictions on drivers and vehicles.....

Forgive me if i'm wrong but does this mean councils can maintain restriction by putting up the cost of operation to control the supply of Taxi's within a restricted or de-restricted area and without limit of how much? :wink:

New York New York

_________________
Alway's been about Tightening the Grip!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
Private Reggie wrote:
MR T wrote:
Skull wrote:
MR T wrote:
You really should learn to understand what it is your reading and what it is intended for.... the best practice guidelines you're quoting are in fact warning councils about their licensing procedures... in other words telling them not to be over-zealous..ie If they are refusing a driver a licence because he has three points... or he must have a blue vehicle, the issue regarding a council being able to restrict is dealt with separately and quite clearly. your arguments would be laughed out of a court...But what's new there..

Section 8 stated:

Licensing requirements which are unduly stringent will tend unreasonably to restrict the supply of taxi and PHC services, by putting up the cost of operation or otherwise restricting entry to the trade.


Oh and obviously they go totally against tighter controls which you say should be in place... :shock:



Aye right Mr. T and of course your definition comes with artificial plate values. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Women's safety doesn't even enter into your thinking :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Time for you to join CC, I think :roll: :roll: :roll:
It shows how much you know.... the same legislation applies to the Derestricted areas... and you have to ask yourself why it was put in... maybe because they have cocked up and tried to regain the balance like placing too many restrictions on drivers and vehicles.....

Forgive me if i'm wrong but does this mean councils can maintain restriction by putting up the cost of operation to control the supply of Taxi's within a restricted or de-restricted area and without limit of how much? :wink:

New York New York

your so blinded by your own vision you cant even read plain English.
your now asking people to explain words and sentences to you .

:roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:38 pm
Posts: 1975
Location: Edinburgh
ALI T wrote:
Private Reggie wrote:
MR T wrote:
Skull wrote:
MR T wrote:
You really should learn to understand what it is your reading and what it is intended for.... the best practice guidelines you're quoting are in fact warning councils about their licensing procedures... in other words telling them not to be over-zealous..ie If they are refusing a driver a licence because he has three points... or he must have a blue vehicle, the issue regarding a council being able to restrict is dealt with separately and quite clearly. your arguments would be laughed out of a court...But what's new there..

Section 8 stated:

Licensing requirements which are unduly stringent will tend unreasonably to restrict the supply of taxi and PHC services, by putting up the cost of operation or otherwise restricting entry to the trade.


Oh and obviously they go totally against tighter controls which you say should be in place... :shock:



Aye right Mr. T and of course your definition comes with artificial plate values. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Women's safety doesn't even enter into your thinking :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: Time for you to join CC, I think :roll: :roll: :roll:
It shows how much you know.... the same legislation applies to the Derestricted areas... and you have to ask yourself why it was put in... maybe because they have cocked up and tried to regain the balance like placing too many restrictions on drivers and vehicles.....

Forgive me if i'm wrong but does this mean councils can maintain restriction by putting up the cost of operation to control the supply of Taxi's within a restricted or de-restricted area and without limit of how much? :wink:

New York New York

your so blinded by your own vision you cant even read plain English.
your now asking people to explain words and sentences to you .

:roll:

Comformation, Second opinion and a reminder to Skull That Mr T knows his stuff

_________________
Alway's been about Tightening the Grip!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
Dougie its the best practice guidance
its giving advice to councils that they shouldn't restrict entry to the trade by extortionate license fee's or any other method for that matter.

only you could read it the other way round.

are you going to show me where in the cgsa it allows for higher fee's to be charged if you have more than one license.

or are you going to admit its just a pipe dream of yours :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
in fact on reading it again
it isnt even talking about licence fee's its talking about anything unreasonable IE must have gold plated wheel trims.

new york new york :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
ALI T wrote:
Dougie its the best practice guidance
its giving advice to councils that they shouldn't restrict entry to the trade by extortionate license fee's or any other method for that matter.

only you could read it the other way round.

are you going to show me where in the cgsa it allows for higher fee's to be charged if you have more than one license.

or are you going to admit its just a pipe dream of yours :?:



Dougie, is barking and reality plays no part in his little world. It's actually quite worrying to think, that this failed medical experiment has fathered children. Surely there must be something in the CGSA, stopping the likes of Dougie, from breeding.







:-|

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 712 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group