Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 9:06 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
Steven Toy wrote:
Because the trades unions fund the Labour Party who have become a party of oppression.

The old left versus right in socio-economic terms has been replaced by a libertarianism versus authoritarianism dichotomy.

The trades unions now fund the party of authoritarianism.

What a stupid reply to the question as to why it's the unions fault that the section you partially disagree with got passed.

If you followed your flawed logic it means it was down just to the unions that the section 75 exemption was repealed. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 8:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 8:57 pm
Posts: 123
Location: Cannock Chase
I agree that the link is somewhat indirect but as a matter of principle I could not join an organisation and in so doing fund the party of oppression.

I still find it hard to reconcile the fact that Union representatives offer advice on how to obtain justice yet they have funded the political party that has made obtaining justice for the common man more difficult.

In 2007 the cost of lodging an appeal in a magistraes' court increased by nearly 300 per cent.

_________________
Steve.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 9:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
Steven Toy wrote:

The old left versus right in socio-economic terms has been replaced by a libertarianism versus authoritarianism dichotomy.



You cannae be a cabbie pal, some of those words have more than two syllables :lol:

What degree are you doing :wink:

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
Steven Toy wrote:

The old left versus right in socio-economic terms has been replaced by a libertarianism versus authoritarianism dichotomy.



You cannae be a cabbie pal, some of those words have more than two syllables :lol:

What degree are you doing :wink:


They say sarcasm is the lowest form :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 9:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 8:57 pm
Posts: 123
Location: Cannock Chase
I've been a cabbie since January 1995. Working now and reading/posting on this site while waiting for fares to come out of houses/pubs.

_________________
Steve.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
IMO the LA already had the authority to ban prior to the 2006 ammendment by virtue of the 1972 LGA section 222?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
captain cab wrote:
IMO the LA already had the authority to ban prior to the 2006 ammendment by virtue of the 1972 LGA section 222?

CC

FFS Captain!!!

You quote these Acts & sections, but I know you have them at your finger-tips on your computer & all you have to do is copy & paste them into your post for all to see & learn.

Instead I now have to trundle through the search engine, find the Act, then the section & download it to my computer.

WTF did I pay 10 pence a day for?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
For my friend BC......

222 Power of local authorities to prosecute or defend legal proceedings..

(1)Where a local authority consider it expedient for the promotion or protection of the interests of the inhabitants of their area—.

(a)they may prosecute or defend or appear in any legal proceedings and, in the case of civil proceedings, may institute them in their own name, and.

(b)they may, in their own name, make representations in the interests of the inhabitants at any public inquiry held by or on behalf of any Minister or public body under any enactment..

(2)In this section “local authority” includes the Common Council [F1and the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority] .



They used this BEFORE the power to immediately suspend was granted. IMO they didnt need the new provisions.



CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
captain cab wrote:
For my friend BC......

222 Power of local authorities to prosecute or defend legal proceedings..

(1)Where a local authority consider it expedient for the promotion or protection of the interests of the inhabitants of their area—.

(a)they may prosecute or defend or appear in any legal proceedings and, in the case of civil proceedings, may institute them in their own name, and.

(b)they may, in their own name, make representations in the interests of the inhabitants at any public inquiry held by or on behalf of any Minister or public body under any enactment..

(2)In this section “local authority” includes the Common Council [F1and the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority] .

They used this BEFORE the power to immediately suspend was granted. IMO they didnt need the new provisions.

CC

Thanks for that & if council's had previously used that legislation, then the new amendment seems to have been unnecessary.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
Steven Toy wrote:
I still find it hard to reconcile the fact that Union representatives offer advice on how to obtain justice yet they have funded the political party that has made obtaining justice for the common man more difficult.

From memory drivers can opt out of paying the political levy.

As for the other parties, ask London cabbies what they think of Boris.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Nigel

You should perhaps ask your local athority to write to both the DFT & OFT asking them to clarify the following from the OFT report;

There is limited evidence to indicate that overcrowding has been a
problem in LAs after the removal of quantity controls. Our case studies,
however, show that where this is an issue, the market often adjusts with
a smaller proportion of taxis waiting at ranks and a greater proportion
plying for hire on the street or expanding to serve different areas. In
Bristol, after the removal of quantity controls, it was noted that taxis
were serving more residential areas which had previously not had any
service.

While we accept that potential rank overcrowding is an issue for LAs
without quantity controls, in our view it can be managed. For example
new ranks or temporary ranks to cover weekend and evening peaks may
be created. Marshals could also be used at peak times to help speed up
traffic flow.


Perhaps you should tell them you seem to have been adjusting for a good few years now and there are still queues of taxis waiting to get onto taxi ranks, also point out you have what they describe as 'quality controls' in place.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Another one on the downside from our friends at the OFT Nidge;

The OFT simply dismisses the difficulties of providing more ranks to meet taxi supply, asserting that vehicles could simply cruise for hire

Dont worry me auld son, asda brought fuel down 2p per litre this week.

It does get better, because the OFT say;

The OFT claims that “congestion and pollution caused by motor vehicles is a huge problem of which taxis are only a small part”

You should perhaps call the OFT in when one of your lads is at magistrates defending his license. After all, taxis are only a small part of the problem :lol:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 419 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group