Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 10:10 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 106 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
toots wrote:
I suppose that's one way to avoid answering the question


Well even you won't defend it, so why would I?

Quote:
Do you have evidence to support this, cos where I'm sitting it certainly isn't true. They do however get to spend more time in their cabs :wink:


So your neck of the woods is precisely the same scenario as that outlined by Captain Cab?

Funny that :wink:

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
toots wrote:
I suppose that's one way to avoid answering the question


Well even you won't defend it, so why would I?


On the issue of selling plates you have already had my opinion

Quote:
Quote:
Do you have evidence to support this, cos where I'm sitting it certainly isn't true. They do however get to spend more time in their cabs


So your neck of the woods is precisely the same scenario as that outlined by Captain Cab?

Funny that


Well if CC's scenario is that taxi drivers in de-restricted areas get to spend a lot more time in their cabs, then yes I suppose it is. You haven't produced any evidence to the contrary tho :D Why do you think it's funny?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
toots wrote:
Quote:
On the issue of selling plates you have already had my opinion


And you haven't worked out mine yet?

Quote:
Well if CC's scenario is that taxi drivers in de-restricted areas get to spend a lot more time in their cabs, then yes I suppose it is. You haven't produced any evidence to the contrary tho :D Why do you think it's funny


I commented on the scenario outlined by CC, and you in turn commented on what I said by reference to your own experience, and I just thought it funny that this was the same as the scenario outlined by CC (which I thought was merely a contrivance to illustrate a point):

Quote:
Is a cab driver better off paying £5K for a cab and plate, or £20K for a cab with free plate because the LA brought in WAV only policies and age limit on first license?


So was that the scenario that took place in your area when numbers were derestricted?

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Still no name?

There's a surprise.

Quote:
captain cab wrote:
Perhaps your view on how a person like skull can earn £100K through an illegal activity such as the sale of plates he was given freely would be a start.


You're just jealous because Skull is a better profiteer than you


Perhaps, but then I have never sold a plate or license.

Quote:
It takes how long to pay off a taxi plate?

So have you been using your column in Taxi Talk to warn people of the dangers of derestriction? Great sytem, restricted numbers, but hey, don't buy a plate whatever you do.

(Perhaps you have, but I've only got a few issues of the magzine, including the July 2004 edition, as it happens )

And Edinburgh pulled the plug in the past, thus anyone buying is surely aware of the risk, or do they want a one-way bet?


I have written about deregulation on numerous occasions since I started writing in taxitalk.....your point is?

Quote:
Big question, and self-evidently there are winners and losers, but the end result is at least a level playing field.

As for fares and standards, these are a matter for the council to regulate, and I can't see any of them bringing them down.


Winners and losers?

Hmmm not too sure about that. If plates are regulated anyone entering the trade is more or less guaranteed a known income. In the deregulated system the certainly are not.

I see you give the ultimate cop out and ignore what has happened in virtually every deregulated are in your second point.

Quote:
Well I'm not in favour of overregulation, but it's certainly the case that in the second scenario there will be a lot less cabs than in the first scenario, so the driver will have more work to pay for the higher standards


It doesnt matter what you are in favour of, the LA will bring in age restictions etc......this has happened in virtually all cases of deregulation.

a lot less cabs you aint had very much experience with deregulation have you? try treble or quadruple the number......yeah a lot less.

Quote:
Sleep tight


I did :D

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
On the issue of selling plates you have already had my opinion



And you haven't worked out mine yet?


I didn't realise you wanted me to. Why have somebody guess what your opinion is why not just state it clearly so everybody knows.

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Well if CC's scenario is that taxi drivers in de-restricted areas get to spend a lot more time in their cabs, then yes I suppose it is. You haven't produced any evidence to the contrary tho Why do you think it's funny



I commented on the scenario outlined by CC, and you in turn commented on what I said by reference to your own experience, and I just thought it funny that this was the same as the scenario outlined by CC (which I thought was merely a contrivance to illustrate a point):


Oh I see you think I don't have an opinion of my own and had to contrive with CC to form one, well you are wrong.

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Is a cab driver better off paying £5K for a cab and plate, or £20K for a cab with free plate because the LA brought in WAV only policies and age limit on first license?



So was that the scenario that took place in your area when numbers were derestricted?


Who is this aimed at and is what the scenario cos they are both questions, no scenario there :? Unless of course you want me to comment on what's happened here since we de-restricted

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
captain cab wrote:
Still no name?

There's a surprise.



What's the fascination with my name? I can't see you badgering anyone else for theirs, and it shouldn't have escaped your attention that the vast majority of people on here use nom-de-plumes.

Quote:
Perhaps, but then I have never sold a plate or license.


But the point is that you do aspire to.

Quote:
Winners and losers?

Hmmm not too sure about that. If plates are regulated anyone entering the trade is more or less guaranteed a known income. In the deregulated system the certainly are not.


And in regulated areas anyone entering the trade is either guaranteed a massive debt round their neck or a massive rental, irrespective of income.



Quote:
I see you give the ultimate cop out and ignore what has happened in virtually every deregulated are in your second point.


Could you be more specific?

Quote:
It doesnt matter what you are in favour of, the LA will bring in age restictions etc......this has happened in virtually all cases of deregulation.


Well I've no objection in principle to age rules.

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
toots wrote:
I didn't realise you wanted me to. Why have somebody guess what your opinion is why not just state it clearly so everybody knows.


FFS, I can't even be bothered looking back at the specific point, but I think the clue to my opinion was in the word 'profiteer'.

You can use Google to look it up Toots, you know, Google that's a search engine.

The dumb blonde/brunette act doesn't work with me :wink:

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
As for the points about the derestriction scenarios, perhaps it's better to rewind a bit.

Captain Cab said:

Quote:
Is a cab driver better off paying £5K for a cab and plate, or £20K for a cab with free plate because the LA brought in WAV only policies and age limit on first license?


I suggested that going from the first to the second scenario could result in less taxis. CC thought that they would triple or quadruple.

I don't believe that for a minute.

Do you think the number of taxis would triple in Edinburgh on derestriction?

Not on your nelly.

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 2665
Same drivers, working the same shifts, just in their own taxis.



8)

2 drivers in 1 taxi = 2 shifts.

2 drivers in 2 taxis = 2 shifts.

BTW The clue for the hard of thinking is that both options esult in 2 shifts.

:lol:

_________________
Skull, "You are a police inspector, aren't you?"
Cab Inspector Smith, "Yes."
Skull, "So, are you going to tell Mr Taylor what his rights are?"
Smith, "And ... What rights?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
toots wrote:
I didn't realise you wanted me to. Why have somebody guess what your opinion is why not just state it clearly so everybody knows.


FFS, I can't even be bothered looking back at the specific point, but I think the clue to my opinion was in the word 'profiteer'.

You can use Google to look it up Toots, you know, Google that's a search engine.

The dumb blonde/brunette act doesn't work with me :wink:


Does that mean you're not going to clearly state what your opinion is of profiteers who sell plates?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
toots wrote:
Does that mean you're not going to clearly state what your opinion is of profiteers who sell plates?


FFS, Toots, the clue is in the word 'profiteer'.

Tell you what, I'll pander to your dumb Toots act and include the dictionary definition here:

profiteer verb [no obj] make or seek to make an excessive or unfair profit, especially illegally or on a black market: [as noun profiteering] seven food merchants were charged with profiteering.
noun a person who profiteers: a war profiteer.

On a more personal level, I don't blame anyone particularly for making money from the sale of a plate, but in the final analyisis it's still profiteering.

Which indeed seems to concur with your own view?

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
As for the points about the derestriction scenarios, perhaps it's better to rewind a bit.

Captain Cab said:

Quote:
Is a cab driver better off paying £5K for a cab and plate, or £20K for a cab with free plate because the LA brought in WAV only policies and age limit on first license?


I suggested that going from the first to the second scenario could result in less taxis. CC thought that they would triple or quadruple.

I don't believe that for a minute.

Do you think the number of taxis would triple in Edinburgh on derestriction?

Not on your nelly.


Ok pre de-restriction we had approx. 82 taxis. Now the question you asked was would they triple on de-restriction in Edinburgh. Who knows I certainly don't but I do know when we de-restricted we hit a high of 400 plates. I do believe there are now 232 plates actually being used. Of those 232 plates 93 have felt it necessary to join a PH circuit to make ends meet. Approx. another 50 odd have joined the other PH circuit to make ends meet. There are not enough rank spaces, theres not enough work. I know several taxi drivers that would like to give up and go back to PH but they can't cos they've got a WAV to pay for, the same WAV they'd bin if they could. The WAV that costs more to maintain than a saloon vehicle, drinks more juice and doesn't actually get them that much work unless they are attached to the PH company. So now they're paying for HP on the WAV and settle for the radio from the PH company. If they had rented they could have just give it back, no great shakes if you know what I mean.

There is also the other aspect of de-restriction and that is the age limit on first plate. With it being under 3 years of age the cheapest vehicle available is approx. £20,000.00+. Bare in mind that the average E7 doesn't last 5 minutes before it needs attention and that is at the cheaper end of the scale for purchasing new or nearly new WAV's.

So anyway imo going from the first to the second scenario does not result in less taxis it just results in poorer taxi drivers working longer hours.

Personally I think it would have made more sense to manage the growth of the taxi industry. If they had actually issued say 10 plates that would be more than there are currently which only work the road or are on taxi circuits. The other 143 are glorified PH that pick up from the streets if they get the chance.

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
toots wrote:
Does that mean you're not going to clearly state what your opinion is of profiteers who sell plates?


FFS, Toots, the clue is in the word 'profiteer'.

Tell you what, I'll pander to your dumb Toots act and include the dictionary definition here:

profiteer verb [no obj] make or seek to make an excessive or unfair profit, especially illegally or on a black market: [as noun profiteering] seven food merchants were charged with profiteering.
noun a person who profiteers: a war profiteer.

On a more personal level, I don't blame anyone particularly for making money from the sale of a plate, but in the final analyisis it's still profiteering.

Which indeed seems to concur with your own view?


There's no need to get shirty. I never asked you to explain what profiteering is, I know what profiteering is. I asked for your opinion of profiteers, which incidently doesn't concur with my view. My view is simple. I don't believe that people should be able to sell their plates. If they don't want them give them back to the council, simples. I think you're having a blonde moment and did not fully understood what it was I was asking :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
No, I think you were having a (feigned) blonde moment and were trying to wind me up :lol:

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
Toots, a couple of questions re your scenario. How much were plates trading for before derestriction, and when did it happen?

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 106 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 754 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group