Taxi Driver Online

You were just very lucky.. that the new management/ directors decided that suing two people who did not have a pot to pi** in was not in the interests of their company.... even a one-eyed dog with no legs would have been awarded costs...... but it would not make out it had won the case....IMO...

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

So tell me Mr. T, do you want to go through the whole case, from the start to finish, blow for blow, win or lose?

We'll get Sussex to set up a thread just for you and me, big fish?

Are you up for it?

Let the viewing public be the Judge?

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"

Mr. T

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"

You're obviously worried about Toots, and her opposition to, now let me think, just about everything male.

The things' forums do for gobby individuals with no brains whatsoever.

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"

I would love to read your version of it.... But the reality is.... the other side abandoned the case..... and I am not in the slightest bit worried about Toots... she has made a fool of you so many times in the past... and as for the Middle Post... you will forgive me if I decline your offer....

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

You should not be too hard on yourself.. at least it keeps you out of trouble.

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

And there you have it, the big fish in the small pond bottles it.


Aye whatever Mr. T

You decline my offer because you would lose. ...

Toots,

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"

There are many things that I can do with my time... helping you live out a fantasy is not one of them..... But keep posting..whether you realise it or not... you are a great source of amusement to many people.... for that I thank you. xxxx

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

Hmmm, it's a good job I know more about what I've done than you, isn't it



From the way I read it it was more choice than force that led to the abandoment of the case and a sensible choice at that. Having an interim interdict lifted isn't anything to be proud of.



I'm not the first person you've said that too am I? I wouldn't have pi**ed my pants I spent 7 years in and out of court. Ok I never spent time there regarding a libel case but I'm more than use to courts



Well there's one thing I'm not and that's two faced



Oh my what a cruel and insensitive man you are. Very much like the cruel and insensitive man that thought it was a good idea to beat what confidence I had out of me. You shouldn't make personal and flippant comments about people you don't know



WTF are you on about



I know more than you think



I'm not opposed to just about everything male, what gave you that impression?



You'd know all about that now wouldn't you



Laughing. That's what their doing at you on the other site cos you was put in your place by a girl

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!

I've got news for you Toots, They are laughing on here as well. I think most people on here would jump to your defense with this moron, but you are more than a match for him on your own.

_________________
Grandad,

You're not the brightest candle in the box, are you Grandad?

Toots is enough to nake misogyny essential.

Glad I have that effect on you, god forbid you should like me

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!

Toots, you haven't a clue have you?

There was no choice of abandonment here. Eminent QC Kinroy had been manoevred by us into a position of certain defeat.

Let me say first though that the claims we made would have been substantiated in any trial. Colky proved he was the scumbag we said he was when he jumped ship and took CRT's company data with him.

As for the case, Lord Emslie accepted that the system is based on a commercial basis, and that we were entitled to proper represntation to protect our rights. He would have allowed us as long as it took to get that representation.

Remember, when we went into court it was costing us £45. CRT's representation was running at around £5000.

There was no choice here. We knew how the system worked and knew how to use it to defeat CRT. CRT were not prepared to shell out for a defence which had nothing to do with the company. It was Colky who was attacked. It was Colky who persuaded the company to shell out to defend him. Quite enterprising for someone who wasn't even qualified to be on the committee in the first place, far less its Chairman.

Interesting that the committee who supported him is substantially still in place. Draw your own conclusions.

CRT, through Kinroy, thought all they had to do was bring in the big legal guns to intimidate two scrotes. It was a slam dunk. Interim interdict, two scrotes silenced, the scumbags on the committee reelected.

But the two scrotes didn't play ball. They recognised the system and used it to defeat CRT. CRT was stiffed, shelling out up to a hundred grand for the privilege. To my knowledge they haven't divulged how much it cost, even to the members. That's some democracy, eh? And the scumbags responsible are still in place. Members get what they deserve.

CRT had NO choice Toots. They were stiffed.

"They're trying to impoverish my client, My Lord" - Kinroy.

Too right. We wanted the case to run forever. We knew the MacDonald case cost £11 million. We had the chance to put CRT out of business. And it would have if they hadn't puylled the case.

So, if there was a choice, it was to acknowledge defeat and stay in business, or fail to acknowledge defeat and lose the company.

I'd be interested to know whether CRT binned its lawyers for poor advice, or whether the lawyers binned CRT for being a bad client?

Ask your source toots and let us all know.

Well at least we agree on something. You describe yourselves as 2 scroates. Yep I definatly agree with that.

_________________
Grandad,