Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 3:33 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:04 pm
Posts: 2859
Location: SCOTLAND
A TAXI boss has backed the WHT’s Freedom of Information request against Welwyn Hatfield Council.
"The council like to sweep a lot under the carpet.
If they behave wrongly the public don’t get to know.
The council use it to bury the fact they make so many mistakes."

Taxi boss Andrew Musk

The Information Commissioner is currently investigating a complaint made by this paper about taxi driver hearings that are held behind closed doors.

As we revealed last month, we are seeking information from the council about the reasons why a number of taxi drivers have had their licences turned down or revoked.

Our fight has been backed by the Newspaper Society.

And this week, the owner of a Times Territory taxi firm added his voice.

Airport Taxis boss Andrew Musk, who is also a member of the National Private Hire Association, said the press and the public should be entitled to attend the meetings, in the same way they can attend court hearings.

He said: “I don’t see why you can’t attend.

“The council like to sweep a lot under the carpet.

“If they behave wrongly the public don’t get to know.

“The council use it to bury the fact they make so many mistakes.”

A Welwyn Hatfield Council spokesman said: “The Information Commissioner approached the council for information relating to the complaint made by the WHT.

“All the information was duly sent on July 1, within the 20-day deadline given. We are currently awaiting the outcome of the Commissioner’s decision.”

And the spokesman reiterated the council’s stance to keep details of such meetings away from public consumption.

He said: “The reason why cases are considered under part two of this committee is due to the Local Government Act 1972.

“This stipulates that any likely disclosure of confidential information, including personal information, individual identity and private financial or business information, is exempt from the press or public on the grounds that the public interest in maintaining this exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing it.”

http://www.whtimes.co.uk/news/taxi_firm ... t_1_539520


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:04 pm
Posts: 2859
Location: SCOTLAND
In Dundee we have been trying to get the council to hold all licence meetings in public because we think a lot gets sweept under the carpet at the closed doors meetings.
We have shown them an article that a license lawyer did in it he says
" Article six of the European Convention on Human Rights, which states that such hearings should be held in public, over-rides the Scottish legislation that allows for some exemptions within licensing committees, including personal and financial information."
but as usual the do not agree. :sad: but are going to discuss it in full at next liaison meeting.
The annoying thing for me is that 9 councils is Scotland already hold licences proceedings in public .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
I think the 'taxi' proprietor is 100% wrong in his interpretation of this.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
what about the individual drivers right to privacy at such hearings ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
what about the individual drivers right to privacy at such hearings ?

Exactly.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
what about the individual drivers right to privacy at such hearings ?

Exactly.


No doubt the chap giving the quotes would have a different view if something was alleged against him.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 879 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group