Chris the Fish wrote:
Jasbar wrote:
You don't know who the individual is, yet you are ready to accept the stated gender, because this individual you don't know tells you?
Is that what you're saying?

I'm delighted to be able to correct you.
You are under the misaprehension that I have not met Toots.
Whilst I have not met you, may I refer you back to my previous post.
I don't care whether you reckon you've met Toots or not. If you say Toots is female, then it would require us to believe you. We have no reason to.
However, you could reveal the ID of this individual and we would all therefore know for sure.
As for your comment not climbing over "her", what logical rationale would there be for anyone to believe that you had met her from that?
Finally, if Toots were indeed a woman, and I don't believe it for an instant, there would have to be no poorer example of the female sex on the planet. Or do you think it's acceptable for one female to so callously disregard other vulnerable females?
I ask the question again, does anyone know of any female who would hold other members of their sex in such poor and callous disregard.
On second thoughts don't bother. This is kind of off-topic sidelining that obscures argument and destroys threads leading them to being locked by admin.
Let's just keep to the topic and get on with it unencumbered by petty side-sniping.