Taxi boss? Or clerk?
Once again Coolky gets it wrong. His bosses got it wrong.
What was the point of this? Improve Coolky's image? Tell ECPH customers how good the company is?
It's done neither.
How it is free from questionable financing? Who wins from this misguided press interlude? Who is giving the poor advice that led to this?
Next week, no one will remember any of this, other than perhaps the tag line which trawled out Stevie Malcolm's name and associated him with gangland. Anyone like me wonder whether he sanctioned this abuse and public sullying of his name?
I can't believe this little foray into the media was approved by him and if it was, why this stoic defence of Coolky? What makes him worth the embarrassment?
The article was written from only one side. There was no hint at what really caused the bile against Coolky to erupt. But who reading the article is gonna believe that this is an innocent being unfairly victimised? And won't some real doubts be raised about the company employing him, particularly when the Sunday Mail has dragged up spurious and unsubstantiable connections with nefarious concerns?
Shouldn't the top man be saying enough is enough. He doesn't need this grief. And the grief is only coming because of Coolky.
Is he worth it? Or has he served his purpose, time to move on?
Isn't it a simple commercial premise that anyone seeking to build a reputation should do so quietly, away from the public spotlight? So, what's all this about?
You know me, I admit when I get it wrong.
Word has filtered down from those in the know. The head honcho was fully informed, I presume sanctioned, this latest publicity foray.
Login
Register
FAQ
