Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 7:47 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 213 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 15  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Jasbar wrote:
toots wrote:
Quote:
It would not be for us to decide, but the trade as a whole.


Pass the book why don't you :roll: I'll ask you the same as I asked Jasbar. If it was up to you what would you like to see by way of standards?


We've nswered this already Tootsie boy.

The stanards will be designed to make sure that imposter assholes like you can't drive the public around.

Now what part of this don't you understand?

Now, tell us all how incensed you are. And how you're searching for the kwik quip to come back with.

BTW Fee I;m gona admit to being a homo, with ambitions of getting it on with an intellectual fantasy like you.

Give's a kiss you big hunk :wink: Got a taxi going my way? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


You spelt standards wrong that time.....unless of course you mean stanards.....which I dont think is in everyday use anymore :lol:

I sense your getting irate........it has been said i have that type of effect.

:lol:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 2665
captain cab wrote:
Jasbar wrote:
But we're gonna ensure this cosy wee cartel ends.

You have grasped this simnple fact, haven't you?


Hiya Pet, glad you've been brought back in because gary got all confused. :lol:

You spelt simple wrong btw :D

CC

Keyboard is like equaility of opportunity .... crap.

Garry's not confusd. You just can;t see this because you're bewildered :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

What would you do if a daughter of yours was raped CC?

And you helped bring it about?

How reasonable would that be?

_________________
Skull, "You are a police inspector, aren't you?"
Cab Inspector Smith, "Yes."
Skull, "So, are you going to tell Mr Taylor what his rights are?"
Smith, "And ... What rights?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Jasbar wrote:
Keyboard is like equaility of opportunity .... crap.

Garry's not confusd. You just can;t see this because you're bewildered :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

What would you do if a daughter of yours was raped CC?

And you helped bring it about?

How reasonable would that be?


There you go with those typo's again.....I cant believe people take the p*ss out of Charley really, when your seemingly so accomplished.

I cant recall mentioning rape, but you did.....again.....have you some type of rape fascination or summat? Wow!!!! Guy, you may need therapy ffs!!!!

Were on about denying a driver unfettered.....or was it unferretered access.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Jasbar wrote:
toots wrote:
Quote:
It would not be for us to decide, but the trade as a whole.


Pass the book why don't you :roll: I'll ask you the same as I asked Jasbar. If it was up to you what would you like to see by way of standards?


We've nswered this already Tootsie boy.

The stanards will be designed to make sure that imposter assholes like you can't drive the public around.

Now what part of this don't you understand?

Now, tell us all how incensed you are. And how you're searching for the kwik quip to come back with.

BTW Fee I;m gona admit to being a homo, with ambitions of getting it on with an intellectual fantasy like you.

Give's a kiss you big hunk :wink: Got a taxi going my way? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


'We' didn't answer anything YOU did and thanks for that. I'm not entirely sure that your standards would keep me out of the trade if I was honest about it.

I won't be travelling to Scotland until the spring apparently, but, when I am I'll let you know just so you check me out from my feet up. I even promise not to laugh when you realise you got it wrong just a little bit Mr Homo :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
So lets get this entirely straight.

Gary, MadJim and AliT want taxis in Edinburgh delimited, in order to allow drivers unfettered access to the tool of their trade, even though all three have benefitted financially through the selling of licenses in a regulated system.

They are asking drivers to invest in a business where they have no idea what the competition will be like within months.

Whereas Dougie believes the council should be allowed to sell the licenses on the basis of demand surveys, thus allowing the drivers time to pay off the debt they will incur in purchasing the license.

A system where plate numbers are capped and where drivers investments can be secure.

Ironically, Gary, MadJim and AliT claim to be the champions of drivers.

ffs

I think I'd rather catch a bus.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Jasbar wrote:
MR T wrote:
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=15569

It would seem.... that delimitation of taxi numbers does not stop rapes... another Jasbar theory turned to dust.... :shock:


No theory of mine. You gotta pay attention. I'll say it again for the hard of thinking like you Mr T. Are you sitting up straight? Then I'll begin.

No council can claim to be protecting public safety unless and until it has done everything it can to protect public safety.

Restricting licences and the availability of taxis, makng it more difficult to get a taxi than it need be, falls well below this benchmark.

De-restricting won't stop rapes happening, but it would limit the opportunity for them to happen.

I know it's difficult when you're looking through vested interest tinted glasses Mr T, but did you get it?



:wink:
http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/s/2084208_woman_in_taxi_indecently_assaulted_by_driver

You really are the most stupidest person it has been my misfortune to ever come across, the point I'm making, you never know who is a rapist they even drive Taxi's', normal people understand this...... But you're not normal.... so you don't.

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
captain cab wrote:
Skull wrote:
exploitation of drivers everyone will be in the same boat.


:-|


Hmmmmmm

exploitation......who's exploiting who?

Dougie suggested medallions.......and improved system on the US version, where those who could only apply were those with driver licenses........coupled with demand surveys.......so the public could be guaranteed sufficient numbers.

Your suggestion has a proven track record of failure.........and you tell us Dougie is mental?

FFS

CC


If you are denied unfettered access to the tools of your trade, and then your tools are sold or hired back to you at an artificial shortage premium. You can safely say you are being dictated the terms and conditions of your employment by those who treat you unequally. Discrimination is a consequence of the aforementioned inequality. Exploitation, is what it means to be turned into casual labour to prop up hiked rentals and artificial plate values that serve the vested interest group. It's the drivers and the public are the meat on the vested interest sandwich.


"Demand surveys" :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
captain cab wrote:
captain cab wrote:
ffs......I got in the bath and there was an earthquake here!

I need to lose weight.

CC


http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-New ... cal_Survey


You must have finally broke wind CC.
Didn't you wonder what all the bubbles were about :lol:

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:38 pm
Posts: 1975
Location: Edinburgh
captain cab wrote:
Skull wrote:
The fact that Derrek Bird was nuts, wasn't up for debate, just like our man Dougie. However, what the trigger will be to set Dougie off, is anyone's guess, de-restriction maybe? Will he simply go for a swan dive of the North Bridge or will it be murder on a grand scale?

You never know with these guys CC. That's why they're nuts.
:lol:


my thoughts obviously went over your head

I dont suppose you've been to West Cumbria and spoken to the drivers there have you?

I dont believe Bird was nuts, I believe he was driven to a state of mind, temporary insanity whatever........there's also accounts of Bird committing suicide with 4 shots.

Now even accounting for checking his weapon......considering his marksmanship in the hours previous.....I'd say if the accounts are correct......then it wouldn't have taken him that many shots to kill himself.

I digress, I could be polite and say 'if your suggesting' but , you ain't suggesting, your stating Dougie is a fruit-loop.

I dont think he is, I think he's came up with an alternative formula for Edinburgh, I think you and the other carpetbaggers, which includes people who dont actually have taxi badges getting proprietors licenses, which I always thought you and jaspar disliked (but patently not), because Dougie's idea may have merits which threaten carpetbagging.

Your personal attacks on the guys mental state dont actually bear up to much.

Jaspar has a proven track record of being a wacko.

Still you know all this.

CC

Water of a ducks back to me CC

Your spot on though, they realise there outdated argument for de-restriction is Now rendered insignificant :D

I can take rejection of an alternative view can THEY that is the question, is there brain preparing them to act in a similar way to Derek Byrd, this could be the reason they are coming up with this level of abusive tripe :shock:

If the council reject the New York model in favour of de-restriction, i move on and live and work with the rules set out in front of me, i don't fear the consequence of de-restriction, THEY fear the consequence of the New York system as it will make them feel more anger than they do just now, they have hope at the moment but on realisation of the fact there is really no hope of winning, well i fear the outcome will tip these guy's over the edge (FRB), This forum has the evidence to prove who amongst us of stable mind and who is not of stable mind

The case in proving who is unstable is Proven against JASBAR, your Guilty, go straight to a nut house do not pass go and hey don't collect your free plate :lol:

_________________
Alway's been about Tightening the Grip!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
Private Reggie wrote:
Water of a ducks back to me CC

Your spot on though, they realise there outdated argument for de-restriction is Now rendered insignificant :D

I can take rejection of an alternative view can THEY that is the question, is there brain preparing them to act in a similar way to Derek Byrd, this could be the reason they are coming up with this level of abusive tripe :shock:

If the council reject the New York model in favour of de-restriction, i move on and live and work with the rules set out in front of me, i don't fear the consequence of de-restriction, THEY fear the consequence of the New York system as it will make them feel more anger than they do just now, they have hope at the moment but on realisation of the fact there is really no hope of winning, well i fear the outcome will tip these guy's over the edge (FRB), This forum has the evidence to prove who amongst us of stable mind and who is not of stable mind

The case in proving who is unstable is Proven against JASBAR, your Guilty, go straight to a nut house do not pass go and hey don't collect your free plate :lol:
well done dougie

i swear if i didn't know better,id have thought that was written from the mind of an 8 year old boy.

Quote:
THEY fear the consequence of the New York system as it will make them feel more anger than they do just now


CMON FFS
this is childlike

like watching the tv program children say the funniest things

aye watch out beadle so does a 40+ year old wiry haired taxi driver from edinburgh


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 2665
Skull wrote:
After reading some of Dougie's posts, I think it fair to ask, after all he is transporting members of the public without the protection of CCTV.

I personally think that Dougie, should be Locked up for his own, and the publics' safety.

Is Dougie Smith, a man on the edge or just a harmless idiot?



:-|


Yup Skull, Dougie is as mad as a bag of ferrets.

:roll:

_________________
Skull, "You are a police inspector, aren't you?"
Cab Inspector Smith, "Yes."
Skull, "So, are you going to tell Mr Taylor what his rights are?"
Smith, "And ... What rights?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
Private Reggie wrote:
If the council reject the New York model in favour of de-restriction, i move on and live and work with the rules set out in front of me


Best move on then Reggie.
The council have no choice but to reject your model. It's illegal :shock:

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
gusmac wrote:
The council have no choice but to reject your model. It's illegal :shock:


You underestimate political desire for cash. I think.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 7:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
captain cab wrote:
.

A system where plate numbers are capped and where drivers investments can be secure.

Ironically, Gary, MadJim and AliT claim to be the champions of drivers.



What about those who'll be profiteering from existing plates?

What about the new plate holders just parking their butts and shafting drivers who can't get a plate?

What about profiteering from the new issues on eventual sale?

But the biggest hole in your argument is that plate values would go through the roof if the system was adopted and thus set in stone - ever wondered why New York prices have skyrocketed?

Thus an economist would probably tell you that a driver will be no better off with a New York-style system in place - plates will soar in price, thus the driver would be better off putting money in a building society, since the risk premium will disappear; it's moving from the junk bond scenario to the gilt-edged security gig, from high risk to minimal, which just drives up asset values, in our case the value of the plate or medallion.

So what price did you have in mind for Edinburgh? Starting bids at £250,000?

It's like bog standard restricted numbers - looks OK at the very superficial level, but think about it a bit and it's a case of the emperor having no clothes.

Of course, in the highly unlikely event that a New York-style system was adopted then the main beneficiaries would be existing plate holders, who woud see values go through the roof. As I said earlier, the main motivation is the incumbent vested interests, who would benefit significantly, while the advantage to those buying in would be minimal.

Which is why it won't happen, but it's all just a wind-up anyway.

Worms, cans, that sort of thing. Anyone punting it would more likely hasten the demise of the current creaking edifice.

I say bring it on....but be careful what you wish for \:D/

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
captain cab wrote:
.

A system where plate numbers are capped and where drivers investments can be secure.

Ironically, Gary, MadJim and AliT claim to be the champions of drivers.



What about those who'll be profiteering from existing plates?

What about the new plate holders just parking their butts and shafting drivers who can't get a plate?

What about profiteering from the new issues on eventual sale?

But the biggest hole in your argument is that plate values would go through the roof if the system was adopted and thus set in stone - ever wondered why New York prices have skyrocketed?

Thus an economist would probably tell you that a driver will be no better off with a New York-style system in place - plates will soar in price, thus the driver would be better off putting money in a building society, since the risk premium will disappear; it's moving from the junk bond scenario to the gilt-edged security gig, from high risk to minimal, which just drives up asset values, in our case the value of the plate or medallion.

So what price did you have in mind for Edinburgh? Starting bids at £250,000?

It's like bog standard restricted numbers - looks OK at the very superficial level, but think about it a bit and it's a case of the emperor having no clothes.

Of course, in the highly unlikely event that a New York-style system was adopted then the main beneficiaries would be existing plate holders, who woud see values go through the roof. As I said earlier, the main motivation is the incumbent vested interests, who would benefit significantly, while the advantage to those buying in would be minimal.

Which is why it won't happen, but it's all just a wind-up anyway.

Worms, cans, that sort of thing. Anyone punting it would more likely hasten the demise of the current creaking edifice.

I say bring it on....but be careful what you wish for \:D/


Lots of questions.

But the ultimate one is of course keep a care home open or close it.

I think I'd know what the politician would do.

What takes the p*ss is that people are selling the plates anyway......everyone know's its going on, so why shouldnt an underfunded council earn the public purse some money?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 213 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 15  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 724 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group