Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Oct 07, 2025 12:09 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
We have some quite severe touting & illegal plying for hire issues in Brum & many of these are by licensed vehicles, both HC & PH from adjacent LAs.

In particular, one Walsall PH company operating under the name 'Hot Line' & using top lights which are allowed by Walsall Licensing, regularly infest the Sutton Coldfield suburb of Birmingham & blatantly ply for hire.

Brum's licensing enforcement officers say that they are not empowered as authorised officers to deal with out of area licensed vehicles, even though they are transgressing within the Brum LA.

Today I asked a senior licensing enforcement officer why they do not seek authorisation from neighbouring councils to become authorised officers for these LAs, so that they can act when the relevant cross border transgressors transgress. This arrangement could also work reciprocally.

They said they would look into the matter to see whether it was feasible.

Then I rang Brian with a Y & low & behold he told me that this arrangement is already alive & kicking in four out of the five Merseyside LAs & also at Gatwick Airport, where licensing enforcement officers from numerous LAs along the south coast are authorised officers by Crawley LA & do enforcement exercises within the airport area.

If this is possible, then why is this arrangement & practice not expanded nationwide to tackle the problems of cross border plying & standing for hire?

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37397
Location: Wayneistan
I wonder about this.

If the vehicle wasn't licensed at all the local authority would act, because it's got a plate on from another area they wont?

Whats the difference........surely trading standards or suchlike can do a swoop and then prosecute for illegal plying regardless of where the vehicle is licensed?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
captain cab wrote:
I wonder about this.

If the vehicle wasn't licensed at all the local authority would act, because it's got a plate on from another area they wont?

Whats the difference........surely trading standards or suchlike can do a swoop and then prosecute for illegal plying regardless of where the vehicle is licensed?

CC

For illegal plying if proved by the driver accepting the fare it could & they would.

But the point is that if they are standing & just that, the local LEO can't question the driver or ask what he is doing there, because it is not a licensed vehicle in the LEO's LA. To all intents & purposes, because it is not a licensed vehicle in the LA in which it is standing, it is just another vehicle as far as the local LEO is concerned.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 11:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Liverpool ,Sefton and the rest, have been working the system for least 10 years

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
For illegal plying if proved by the driver accepting the fare it could & they would.

But the point is that if they are standing & just that, the local LEO can't question the driver or ask what he is doing there, because it is not a licensed vehicle in the LEO's LA.


So if they can act on cross-border vehicles accepting a hire, why can't the act on illegal plying per se? After all, if they're sitting in the wrong place without a booking then that's illegal plying as much as when the actually accept a punter, or is the latter case just easier to prove?

Anyway, it's ridiculous that in the Hitchin article they managed to suspend the licence of a Stevenage driver who didn't have a fire extinguisher, yet here they can't do anything at all.

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
For illegal plying if proved by the driver accepting the fare it could & they would.

But the point is that if they are standing & just that, the local LEO can't question the driver or ask what he is doing there, because it is not a licensed vehicle in the LEO's LA.

So if they can act on cross-border vehicles accepting a hire, why can't the act on illegal plying per se? After all, if they're sitting in the wrong place without a booking then that's illegal plying as much as when the actually accept a punter, or is the latter case just easier to prove?

Anyway, it's ridiculous that in the Hitchin article they managed to suspend the licence of a Stevenage driver who didn't have a fire extinguisher, yet here they can't do anything at all.

If they accept a booking whilst standing or plying that's easy. It's the 'bird-scaring' bit that's the hard part.

And the fact that the Merseyside LAs have all authorised each others LEOs to act in a cross border manner shows that LEOs are limited by the legislation as to who they can act against & where, unless they are indeed cross border authorised by neighbouring LAs.

Otherwise what would be the point of cross border authorisation of LEOs as in Merseyside & at Gatwick?

All of which really does beg the question;

WHY IS A PARLIAMENTARY TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE LOOKING IN PART AT THIS ISSUE WHEN IT CAN BE SOLVED BY CROSS BORDER AUTHORISATION OF LEOs?

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37397
Location: Wayneistan
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
All of which really does beg the question;

WHY IS A PARLIAMENTARY TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE LOOKING IN PART AT THIS ISSUE WHEN IT CAN BE SOLVED BY CROSS BORDER AUTHORISATION OF LEOs?


Give that man a cigar......I been saying the same thing for months :wink:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
captain cab wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
All of which really does beg the question;

WHY IS A PARLIAMENTARY TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE LOOKING IN PART AT THIS ISSUE WHEN IT CAN BE SOLVED BY CROSS BORDER AUTHORISATION OF LEOs?

Give that man a cigar......I been saying the same thing for months :wink:

CC

Yeah, but I write it instead of saying it!!!

The pen is mightier than the sword!!

Or in this case, my keyboard is mightier than your gob!!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
Well I haven't seen or read any of the Trans Comm stuff, but I'd bet that cross-border authorisation wasn't exactly at the top of the agenda.

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
Well I haven't seen or read any of the Trans Comm stuff, but I'd bet that cross-border authorisation wasn't exactly at the top of the agenda.

In that case sit through 2 hours and 11 minutes of this;

http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Playe ... ingId=7444

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:21 am
Posts: 869
Location: A taxi on a taxi rank
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
Well I haven't seen or read any of the Trans Comm stuff, but I'd bet that cross-border authorisation wasn't exactly at the top of the agenda.

In that case sit through 2 hours and 11 minutes of this;

http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Playe ... ingId=7444


Thanks - once I've recovered from the video of the 2004 meeting I might have a butcher's :D

Wondered why I couldn't find it on the iPlayer.

_________________
Caledonian Cabbie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Caledonian Cabbie wrote:
Well I haven't seen or read any of the Trans Comm stuff, but I'd bet that cross-border authorisation wasn't exactly at the top of the agenda.

In that case sit through 2 hours and 11 minutes of this;

http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Main/Playe ... ingId=7444

Thanks - once I've recovered from the video of the 2004 meeting I might have a butcher's :D

Wondered why I couldn't find it on the iPlayer.

If you had looked on iPlayer under comedy you might have found it there too!!

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56477
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
All of which really does beg the question;

WHY IS A PARLIAMENTARY TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE LOOKING IN PART AT THIS ISSUE WHEN IT CAN BE SOLVED BY CROSS BORDER AUTHORISATION OF LEOs?


Give that man a cigar......I been saying the same thing for months :wink:


But the main bone of contention isn't PH plying out of area, but PH waiting out of area.

Having LOs with many hats ain't going to address that.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24351
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
but the police can nick em if they take a flagdown/unbooked jobbie

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
All of which really does beg the question;

WHY IS A PARLIAMENTARY TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE LOOKING IN PART AT THIS ISSUE WHEN IT CAN BE SOLVED BY CROSS BORDER AUTHORISATION OF LEOs?

Give that man a cigar......I been saying the same thing for months :wink:

But the main bone of contention isn't PH plying out of area, but PH waiting out of area.

Having LOs with many hats ain't going to address that.

Why not?

They would be acting within their own LA, tackling PH standing & plying out of area within the LEOs area & the LEO would have the same powers as if he was the trangressor's LEO.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group