Sussex wrote:
Gateshead Angel wrote:
This is yet another council being applauded for doing less, yeah thats good for the trade innit.
Well if you haven't yet mastered the difference between a 'qualitative' restriction, and a 'quantative' restriction, then I don't think you ever will.
![Brick wall ](*,)](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
As for letting the existing saloons stay as they are, well clearly that was a sop to soften the de-limit blow. A sop that the government will more than likely erase in a few years time.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/wink.gif)
RAOTFLMFAO
Howay Sussex Man, your termanology shifts as often as my opinion (apparently).
What we have discussed during our time has also changed with the same frequency.
You argued for a single tier, and considered the OFT would deliver it.
Then you arued against quantative restrictions as you believed the OFT had delivered it.
Now your arguing for a "qualitative" restriction, would it be on the basis that its the only way you can justify your one sided argument to get a plate for free.
Still, keep saying that the whole taxi world is unfair, but remember its only unfair to you and those without, I feel sorry for the exploited drivers both HC and PH and it is that unfairness we should be addressing here, not the unfairness you feel as a spoilt brat who has the opportunity or options not afforded to those people being really exploited.
B. Lucky
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)