Taxi Driver Online

No. I know I know. I've seen your type many times before.

and sadly, ive seen your sort just as many times

the difference between me and you is that i accept you have a right to an opinion whereas you object to any view different to your own

By the way, so far HMG have nicked all my ideas

Rubber bullets
Water cannon
Curfew
Benefits stopped for rioters

I should be an advisor for the goverment


How long have you been having these delusions of grandeur and self-importance skull?

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most

Hmm the old pot & kettle springs to mind.

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.

Why don't you come out of the closet and inform your council of your name and taxi licence number? You can then point to your opinion on this forum, racist and otherwise, and allow your councillors to judge on how valuable your comments really are.

I will even assist you with the process? Give me, your name and licence number and I will write the letter giving you the opportunity.

What's the bet, a man of conviction, or a coward and a back stabbing little worm?

As I said, and these idiots only wrote about it.

http://news.sky.com/home/uk-news/article/16051275

_________________
IDFIMH

It was always going to be stiff sentences! They have in effect done a "Ronnie Biggs" they turned on the "Establishment" and threatened their way of life (their authority etc).

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.

conspiracy and perjury/perverting the course are all heavy sentences too...

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most

Oh my god what a henious crime writing on facebook !!!

oops..........wrong post

yip, but they were lucky, there are a plethora of much more serious charges they could have been hit with, incitement to riot, and if HM was due a visit the same day how about treason?

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most

he must have an IQ the same as his hat size....

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most

wannabeeahack Writes:





Why don't you come out of the closet and inform your council of your name and taxi licence number? You can then point to your opinion on this forum, racist and otherwise, and allow your councillors to judge on how valuable your comments really are.

I will even assist you with the process? Give me, your name and licence number and I will write the letter giving you the opportunity.


What's the bet, a man of conviction, or a coward and a back stabbing little worm?


Come on, Wannabeeahack, give the councillors the benefit of your opinion.

You just don't get it do you?

Riot

( Archbold 29-4 to 29-9 )

Under section 1 of the Act, it must be proved that:
twelve or more persons
present together
used or threatened unlawful violence (all charged must use)
for a common purpose; and that
the conduct of them (taken together)
was such as to cause
a person of reasonable firmness
present at the scene
to fear for his personal safety.

For a definition of unlawful violence - section 8 of the Act. ( Archbold 29-38 )

For the requisite standard of mens rea - section 6 of the Act. ( Archbold 29-35 )

Providing the above conditions are met each of the persons using unlawful violence for a common purpose is guilty of riot. Others can commit this offence by aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the use of violence, e.g. encouraging, planning, directing or coordinating the activities of those involved in violent action. These should be charged as joint principals.

For additional assistance on drafting the indictment see (Tyler and Others 96 Cr App R. 332 (CA)).

Charges under section 1 should only be used for the most serious cases usually linked to planned or spontaneous serious outbreaks of sustained violence

Conduct which falls within the scope of this offence might have the one or more of the following characteristics:
the normal forces of law and order have broken down
due to the intensity of the attacks on police and other civilian authorities normal access by emergency services is impeded by mob activity
due to the scale and ferocity of the disorder, severe disruption and fear is caused to members of the public
the violence carries with it the potential for a significant impact upon a significant number of non-participants for a significant length of time
organised or spontaneous large scale acts of violence on people and/or property

An offence under section 1 is triable on indictment only. The maximum penalty on conviction is ten years' imprisonment and/or a fine of unlimited amount.

A prosecution for riot or incitement to riot may be commenced only by, or with the consent of, the Director of Public Prosecutions (refer to Consents to Prosecute, elsewhere in this guidance).

The decision to charge riot should be discussed with the Chief Crown Prosecutor (ACCP in London). CCPs (ACCPs in London) should notify the Director where any charge of riot is being pursued.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.

That's not debating; that's bear baiting!!

The RSPCA should be told about you!!

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.