Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat Apr 04, 2026 6:01 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
very well done to all of them now they will be able to earn more now there lives will change, i know when i passed it was the best day in my life i could hold up my head up for now on. =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> :idea: :D 8) :? :? :?

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Know
PostPosted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
Sussex wrote:
charles007 wrote:
I have had two letter sent me this week from a counple of assiaction i now run, about A meeting in August 2011, in Sliver street Bury and my members are asking why an association with over 500 members in the N/west did not get an invite.? the list is pepole there. My reply was" **** **** **** me". i may yet put the list on here.

Because no-one, other than me, likes you. :wink:

On a more serious note, if they don't want you there, then f*** them.

yes you may be right bout, but as this what the trade as come downe to liking some one.or is it about supporting the trade when it is needed.

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: You Know
PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
MR T wrote:
I went to that Charlie.

So did I, but I couldn't make the meeting in London in the middle of September. The trade was well represented at that nigh on four hour meeting that apparently went very well by all reports.

As far as I know, the Law commission are doing the rounds - extensively. Their representatives are speaking to both PH and HC organisations, representative bodies etc up and down the country, usually in London, but sometimes travelling around the country too. Obviously these meeting are by prior appointment only.

I believe this will continue until about March next year, or just short of then. They want to gather as much evidence and opinion about the two trades as they can, before the next stage, which I believe will be the consultation paper.

If you represent a sizeable chunk of the trade Mr Charles007, then they may wish to talk to you too. Look up the relevant website for contact details.

But then again they may already be fully booked up.

You will need to hold an 18 inch piece of 2 x 2 wood with one end sharpened to a point though!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Charlie.... I will tell you the way I see it... the changes in the laws are already written... all that is happening now is what is required so that the changes cannot be challenged. it is called going through the motions, they have to hold consultations, to be legal. and a lot of people representing the trade actually think they are going to make a difference, their views will be listened to and taken on board..... just like they did with the OFT.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The battle will begin when their report is published...... do these people have what it takes to win, they didn't last time what has changed.....?? :sad:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
I agree Mr T, been looking at what was said at the meeting of minds
about.

Deregulation
While a desire to Limit (or re-limit) numbers of taxis was expressed, as was a desire to limit numbers of private hire vehicles, it was agreed amongst those present that the current Dft stance (and HOC)" What is HOC? would never go against total deregulation across the country, irrespective of future legislation changes.

now that does not sound good. i know whaqt my members will say. sounds like they have given up before they started.

thats were Mr Boaler is chair of NTTG, i wounder whether Eddie Gorman is the same Eddie Gorman who work for Bolton Licencing a few years back. George Simms Treasurer. and pat connor committee.

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
charles007 wrote:
I agree Mr T, been looking at what was said at the meeting of minds
about.

Deregulation
While a desire to Limit (or re-limit) numbers of taxis was expressed, as was a desire to limit numbers of private hire vehicles, it was agreed amongst those present that the current Dft stance (and HOC)" What is HOC? would never go against total deregulation across the country, irrespective of future legislation changes.

now that does not sound good. i know whaqt my members will say. sounds like they have given up before they started.

thats were Mr Boaler is chair of NTTG, i wounder whether Eddie Gorman is the same Eddie Gorman who work for Bolton Licencing a few years back. George Simms Treasurer. and pat connor committee.

Charlie use the PM function on here and send me a copy of the minutes..... please

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
MR T wrote:
Charlie.... I will tell you the way I see it... the changes in the laws are already written... all that is happening now is what is required so that the changes cannot be challenged. it is called going through the motions, they have to hold consultations, to be legal. and a lot of people representing the trade actually think they are going to make a difference, their views will be listened to and taken on board..... just like they did with the OFT.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The battle will begin when their report is published...... do these people have what it takes to win, they didn't last time what has changed.....?? :sad:

If you take that view, then you appear to be in a boat and have already thrown away your paddles, while trying to navigate a white water rapid!!

As I have said before, not making strong representations, WITH VALID REASONS EXPLAINING THOSE POINTS OF VIEW, is not an option!!

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
then what do you call this below then.

Deregulation
While a desire to Limit (or re-limit) numbers of taxis was expressed, as was a desire to limit numbers of private hire vehicles, it was agreed amongst those present that the current Dft stance (and HOC)" What is HOC? would never go against total deregulation across the country, irrespective of future legislation changes.

now that does not sound good. i know whaqt my members will say. sounds like they have given up before they started.

thats were Mr Boaler is chair of NTTG, i wounder whether Eddie Gorman is the same Eddie Gorman who work for Bolton Licencing a few years back. George Simms Treasurer. and pat connor committee.

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
MR T wrote:
Charlie.... I will tell you the way I see it... the changes in the laws are already written... all that is happening now is what is required so that the changes cannot be challenged. it is called going through the motions, they have to hold consultations, to be legal. and a lot of people representing the trade actually think they are going to make a difference, their views will be listened to and taken on board..... just like they did with the OFT.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The battle will begin when their report is published...... do these people have what it takes to win, they didn't last time what has changed.....?? :sad:

If you take that view, then you appear to be in a boat and have already thrown away your paddles, while trying to navigate a white water rapid!!

As I have said before, not making strong representations, WITH VALID REASONS EXPLAINING THOSE POINTS OF VIEW, is not an option!!

It's not if I take that view.... This is my view..... my view has dramatically changed from when it was simply the Transport Select Committee ..the Law Commission were asked to look at this many many many months ago.... and then they jumped in with both feet six hours after the Transport Select Committee gave its findings and said there was no need for them.... I would say my view has definitely changed..... and I know when I'm about to be shafted... been there before..... the People in charge of the National Union's / association's should be shouting from the rooftops... ringing all the warning bells.... and waking the trade up... but What do I hear... silence... silence... silence....

Now this is because I am totally wrong and they are right.... so I will make my own judgments... at least then if I make a mistake I can only blame myself....

Or is it in their interests.... they want change at all costs.... because in the new regime they will be in a position of power... and I don't mean driving a taxi....

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
charles007 wrote:
then what do you call this below then.

Deregulation
While a desire to Limit (or re-limit) numbers of taxis was expressed, as was a desire to limit numbers of private hire vehicles, it was agreed amongst those present that the current Dft stance (and HOC)" What is HOC? would never go against total deregulation across the country, irrespective of future legislation changes.

now that does not sound good. i know whaqt my members will say. sounds like they have given up before they started.

thats were Mr Boaler is chair of NTTG, i wounder whether Eddie Gorman is the same Eddie Gorman who work for Bolton Licencing a few years back. George Simms Treasurer. and pat connor committee.

I totally agree with your view.

The problem as I see it is that when presenting such an opposite view to that which politicians, the DfT, the Law Commission and the like might hold, it is useless just stating such an opposite viewpoint without strong reasoning and evidence for your own convictions.

To demonstrate what I mean by that, just look at the TDO document, 'Myth and Reality'; a 70-page publication examining the issue of restricted taxi numbers.

Now I totally disagree with that document, because it does not take into account the basic economical model of 'Supply and Demand', or in the trade's case biased supply and demand, and therefore in my view 'Myth and Reality' is a flawed document.

And that's my view!!

But it is also my view that the author of that document went to great lengths [70 pages of length] to explain in comprehensive detail his [and perhaps others] points of view on the subject of restricted numbers.

And for that I have to begrudgingly admire and indeed congratulate the author, not for the contents of that publication which I have previously said I disagree with, but for his tenacity, determination and devotion in expressing his viewpoint so comprehensively in writing.

When have you ever seen a publication or document so meticulously drafted and lengthy as 'Myth and Reality' with opposing and contrary opinions, reasoning that restricted licence numbers is the preferred option for the trade?

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
MR T wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
MR T wrote:
Charlie.... I will tell you the way I see it... the changes in the laws are already written... all that is happening now is what is required so that the changes cannot be challenged. it is called going through the motions, they have to hold consultations, to be legal. and a lot of people representing the trade actually think they are going to make a difference, their views will be listened to and taken on board..... just like they did with the OFT.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The battle will begin when their report is published...... do these people have what it takes to win, they didn't last time what has changed.....?? :sad:

If you take that view, then you appear to be in a boat and have already thrown away your paddles, while trying to navigate a white water rapid!!

As I have said before, not making strong representations, WITH VALID REASONS EXPLAINING THOSE POINTS OF VIEW, is not an option!!

It's not if I take that view.... This is my view..... my view has dramatically changed from when it was simply the Transport Select Committee ..the Law Commission were asked to look at this many many many months ago.... and then they jumped in with both feet six hours after the Transport Select Committee gave its findings and said there was no need for them.... I would say my view has definitely changed..... and I know when I'm about to be shafted... been there before..... the People in charge of the National Union's / association's should be shouting from the rooftops... ringing all the warning bells.... and waking the trade up... but What do I hear... silence... silence... silence....

Now this is because I am totally wrong and they are right.... so I will make my own judgments... at least then if I make a mistake I can only blame myself....

Or is it in their interests.... they want change at all costs.... because in the new regime they will be in a position of power... and I don't mean driving a taxi....

Despite all you have written above, is that a reason not to at least try to persuade and influence those that will be drafting reports and legislation?

If you don't try, you're damn sure to be unsuccessful!!!

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
sorry about the spelling :sad: :oops:

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
charles007 wrote:
sorry about the spelling :sad: :oops:

Getting used to it.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
charles007 wrote:
then what do you call this below then.

Deregulation
While a desire to Limit (or re-limit) numbers of taxis was expressed, as was a desire to limit numbers of private hire vehicles, it was agreed amongst those present that the current Dft stance (and HOC)" What is HOC? would never go against total deregulation across the country, irrespective of future legislation changes.

now that does not sound good. i know whaqt my members will say. sounds like they have given up before they started.

thats were Mr Boaler is chair of NTTG, i wounder whether Eddie Gorman is the same Eddie Gorman who work for Bolton Licencing a few years back. George Simms Treasurer. and pat connor committee.

I totally agree with your view.

The problem as I see it is that when presenting such an opposite view to that which politicians, the DfT, the Law Commission and the like might hold, it is useless just stating such an opposite viewpoint without strong reasoning and evidence for your own convictions.

To demonstrate what I mean by that, just look at the TDO document, 'Myth and Reality'; a 70-page publication examining the issue of restricted taxi numbers.

Now I totally disagree with that document, because it does not take into account the basic economical model of 'Supply and Demand', or in the trade's case biased supply and demand, and therefore in my view 'Myth and Reality' is a flawed document.

And that's my view!!

But it is also my view that the author of that document went to great lengths [70 pages of length] to explain in comprehensive detail his [and perhaps others] points of view on the subject of restricted numbers.

And for that I have to begrudgingly admire and indeed congratulate the author, not for the contents of that publication which I have previously said I disagree with, but for his tenacity, determination and devotion in expressing his viewpoint so comprehensively in writing.

When have you ever seen a publication or document so meticulously drafted and lengthy as 'Myth and Reality' with opposing and contrary opinions, reasoning that restricted licence numbers is the preferred option for the trade?


I have to say i have not seen it but will look it up.

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2011 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Quote:
Despite all you have written above, is that a reason not to at least try to persuade and influence those that will be drafting reports and legislation?

If you don't try, you're damn sure to be unsuccessful
!!!


I don't think... No I definitely haven't.. said people shouldn't express their views...or go to meetings.... what I am saying is don't rely on this to succeed..... because at the end of the day... if they come out with something the trade does not want, you must be prepared... and that is so so simple..

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 695 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group