Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat Apr 04, 2026 6:10 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 190 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 13  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Dusty Bin wrote:
1.8 Bryan Roland (BR) noted that 95% of drivers were self-employed. Private hire operators were concerned that a one-tier system would not give them sufficient control over drivers to allow them to cope with demand. The labour market was a different shape in each area and it was not possible to say to what extent driving work represented the main source of income.

I cannot believe that in that meeting were three representatives from three unions, two of them very militant, yet a boss of bosses speaks about controlling drivers and not one of them puts it on record that he is talking out of his arse.

Shameful. [-X

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
I actually haven't got a problem with some changes that are suggested... and I don't think saying no no no is the answer.... if it had been I would be up to my neck in horse sh*t now

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Sussex wrote:
Dusty Bin wrote:
1.8 Bryan Roland (BR) noted that 95% of drivers were self-employed. Private hire operators were concerned that a one-tier system would not give them sufficient control over drivers to allow them to cope with demand. The labour market was a different shape in each area and it was not possible to say to what extent driving work represented the main source of income.

I cannot believe that in that meeting were three representatives from three unions, two of them very militant, yet a boss of bosses speaks about controlling drivers and not one of them puts it on record that he is talking out of his arse.

Shameful. [-X

Didn't you know.. unions are for the middle classes now... didn't you see that yesterday :?:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
1.22 RP explained that the Law Commission was considering proposing a two-tier system with national standards for PHVs but a more local approach for taxi licensing. The main concerns here were the impact of technology on the distinction between the two and the extent to which the two trades were closely linked, for example in relation to training. He further noted that it may be possible in such a system for local authorities to create a de facto one-tier system by applying the national PHV standards to taxis.

Some please remind me WTF the Law Commission are on about here? :?

Exactly what has technology got to do with the number of tiers? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Sussex wrote:
Quote:
1.22 RP explained that the Law Commission was considering proposing a two-tier system with national standards for PHVs but a more local approach for taxi licensing. The main concerns here were the impact of technology on the distinction between the two and the extent to which the two trades were closely linked, for example in relation to training. He further noted that it may be possible in such a system for local authorities to create a de facto one-tier system by applying the national PHV standards to taxis.

Some please remind me WTF the Law Commission are on about here? :?

Exactly what has technology got to do with the number of tiers? :?

what this means.. is all new drivers will be required to take the NVQ... and part of their training.. will be regarding traffic accidents... and a list of specialist solicitors will be supplied

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
1.34 BR felt that much of the problem stemmed from the lack of alternatives such as night buses. He suggested that allowing taxis to have more than eight seats could help with clearing town centres. In 1982 the Department for Transport (DfT) had encouraged licensing authorities to licence vehicles with as many seats as possible, but since 1985 a taxi or PHV had to have eight seats or fewer.

So to solve the problem of late night supply, we have more f***ing buses. ](*,)

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
MR T wrote:
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
Personally I am going to concentrate on making a living.....

Wise words.

But then again you are really old and will soon be gone. :shock:


I came back to this... because on reflection you're more likely of a heart attack by the way you're posting than I am...

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
1.37 The group generally was clearly against the concept of ranking for PHVs. MB felt that this would encourage cross-border issues with PHVs coming into town centres from outlying areas.

A group consisting of taxi reps, and PH bosses. Anyone care to ask the PH drivers if they would like that option?

Was there anyone at that meeting representing the majority of licensed drivers? [-(

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Sussex wrote:
Quote:
1.34 BR felt that much of the problem stemmed from the lack of alternatives such as night buses. He suggested that allowing taxis to have more than eight seats could help with clearing town centres. In 1982 the Department for Transport (DfT) had encouraged licensing authorities to licence vehicles with as many seats as possible, but since 1985 a taxi or PHV had to have eight seats or fewer.

So to solve the problem of late night supply, we have more f***ing buses. ](*,)

yes but they could be nine seater taxi buses... getting paid a subsidy

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
1.38 SW felt that allowing marshalled PHV ranks would destroy pre-booking as operators would lose control of their workforce. RP noted that the suggestions only extended to night-time and that what was envisaged was a window of de-regulation.

Since when has it been their work-force?

Are those drivers salaried? Do they pay drivers stamp? Do those drivers have paid holidays or proper sickness cover?

Do they f***. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
MR T wrote:
So to solve the problem of late night supply, we have more f***ing buses. ](*,)

yes but they could be nine seater taxi buses... getting paid a subsidy

I doubt the boss of bosses was thinking about 9 seaters.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Sussex wrote:
Quote:
MR T wrote:
So to solve the problem of late night supply, we have more f***ing buses. ](*,)

yes but they could be nine seater taxi buses... getting paid a subsidy

I doubt the boss of bosses was thinking about 9 seaters.

he will be :lol:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
1.40 Patrick Raeburn (PR) explained that he operated entirely in the night-time economy, servicing clubs and bars. He was concerned that he would lose all his drivers if they were allowed to rank at night.

His drivers? [-X

If drivers wish to clear the work in front of their noses (legally), then that's their decision.

Of course if he wants to employ 'his' drivers, then he should do it. But I bet he doesn't.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
1.52 Bill Bowling (BB) explained that limousines encountered major problems with cross-border restrictions. They could not readily operate within just one area.

F***ing heart bleeds for him. [-(

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57242
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
JU clarified that the Law Commission was not proposing boundaries in relation to PHVs.

So much for consultation.

And evidence of abject failure on behalf of the Unite union. They wanted cross-border sorted, and it's being made legal. ](*,)

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 190 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 13  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 690 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group