Sussex wrote:
The difference between what you appear to be saying and what I'm saying is that you are implying the whole report is sh** just because it proposes a removal of council's ability to restrict taxi numbers, whereas I'm saying that despite there being some iffy bits in the report, it's not all bad.
It's about time some people opened their eyes up a bit more.
I'm saying the whole report is sh*t for different reasons, but the fact remains its a p*ss poor effort, what you describe as iffy could be interpreted as foolish (as best), and stupid (at worst).
And thats getting away from the deregulation argument.
What the LC have come up with......spending god knows how much of the almost half a million they are being paid is not exactly horseshite, because horseshite will have least have the benefit of making sure your roses grow well, what they have managed to achive is something so bad, everyone is seemingly against it.
Including wedding and funeral cars whilst ignoring volunteers? ffs can someone explain that to me?
allowing cross border.....no....legalising it? wtf were these muppets actually on when they thought up that one?
declaring their interest in national standards......then not giving us a scoobs wtf they meant by national standards......not only that, not even suggesting which councils where f*cking sh*te? (I'll give you two examples....rossendale and gelding are pretty much retarded)
Lets look at their useless.....nay f*cking incompetant impact assessment, which could be 500% out?
ffs, I would expect a primary school class to have come up with something better via google.
Login
Register
FAQ
