Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 12:19 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Executive to consider rise in age of Pendle taxis



Pendle Council’s Executive will be asked to increase the age limit of hackney and private hire vehicles to 12 years at its meeting on Tuesday.

The recommendation has been made by the council’s Taxi Licensing Committee following a request from the trade due to financial pressure s and lack of business.

The current age limit for licensed vehicles is up to seven years when first licensed and can continue to be licensed until they reach nine years of age and for wheelchair accessible vehicles seven through to 12 years of age.

Taxi tests are carried out once a year for vehicles one to three years old, twice a year for vehicles over three years old and for a vehicle failing on serious faults three times a year until it has passed three consecutive tests with no faults.

This age limit was introduced in 2009 due to the high number of vehicles failing spot checks. The previous limit was eight years when first licensed through to 10 years.

Since the age limit was introduced in 2009, 13 spot checks have been carried out resulting in 229 vehicles being tested with 118 being taken off the road with mechanical faults. This equates to a failure rate of 52%.

Consideration to extending the age limit has been considered many times by the Taxi Licensing Committee and the Executive on numerous occasions, with the last one being in May, 2012 when it was agreed that no change be made.

A petition from the Hackney Carriage Driver’s Association was considered at a meeting of the Taxi Licensing Committee on February 13th.

The petition had 58 signatures in favour of increasing the age limit due to increasing financial pressures and lack of business, meaning them having to work longer hours to make the same wages, affecting them and their families.

source: http://www.pendletoday.co.uk/news/local ... -1-6511764

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
That's a higher failure rate than that of "white vans" at MoT, currently about 46% according to VOSA.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
The age of a vehicle has nothing to do with failure rates - failure rates are purely down to maintenance.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:35 pm
Posts: 1855
I was wondering the other day why a three year old vehicle requires more testing than one less than three years old?

After three years do the brake pads/discs start to wear out quicker, bulbs blow more often, track rod ends fail within six months rather than twelve ? Do dents and scratches suddenly start to appear in the bodywork, the interior trim magically disintegrate ? Does the lifespan of a tyre shrink from 20k miles to 5k ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 8:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Exactly how much difference in price will a 10 year old Mondeo be compared to a 12 year old version?

£5, £10??

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
captain cab wrote:
The age of a vehicle has nothing to do with failure rates - failure rates are purely down to maintenance.


been telling them that for 12months

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
Sussex wrote:
Exactly how much difference in price will a 10 year old Mondeo be compared to a 12 year old version?

£5, £10??



Not the point

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 2:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
captain cab wrote:
The age of a vehicle has nothing to do with failure rates - failure rates are purely down to maintenance.



I wish there was a like button on here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
charles007 wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Exactly how much difference in price will a 10 year old Mondeo be compared to a 12 year old version?

£5, £10??



Not the point

It is because they are using that as an excuse to gain a longer age limit.

Why not just be honest and point to DfT Best Practise and say age has no bearing on the fitness of vehicles.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 8:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
Seems like I'm about to have a repeat of last year's battle with Shepway about the age of my Voyager; 9 years old and still in VERY GOOD condition according to the testing station. 156000 miles on the clock, so barely run in!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 9:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
The age limit thing is a strange one,as in here you can keep a older vehicle if it passes the council's "exceptional condition" at the test.Three times a year ! But should all vehicles not be up to standard,cause yours is a few years different it can be just ok.Anyway if they don't get there way with age,they will with emissions !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
Sussex wrote:
charles007 wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Exactly how much difference in price will a 10 year old Mondeo be compared to a 12 year old version?

£5, £10??



Not the point

It is because they are using that as an excuse to gain a longer age limit.

Why not just be honest and point to DfT Best Practise and say age has no bearing on the fitness of vehicles.


We have again and again

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 22, 2014 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
blackpool wrote:
The age limit thing is a strange one,as in here you can keep a older vehicle if it passes the council's "exceptional condition" at the test.Three times a year ! But should all vehicles not be up to standard,cause yours is a few years different it can be just ok.Anyway if they don't get there way with age,they will with emissions !


I am going to try and get other members in Blackpool I have got one.

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 510 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group