Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 5:01 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:35 pm
Posts: 1855
edders23 wrote:
there are special smartphones that blind people can buy that do all those things with voice commands :wink:
Thanks for enlightening me, I didn't know.
I'm not sure how using voice commands would work with the Uber app though, you might get the phone to open it but unless the app supports it I can't see how all the required details can then be entered.
Surely just using voice commands to dial a regular taxi number is easier, 'open phone, dial xyz taxis' ??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:04 am
Posts: 2555
sasha wrote:
edders23 wrote:
there are special smartphones that blind people can buy that do all those things with voice commands :wink:
Thanks for enlightening me, I didn't know.
I'm not sure how using voice commands would work with the Uber app though, you might get the phone to open it but unless the app supports it I can't see how all the required details can then be entered.
Surely just using voice commands to dial a regular taxi number is easier, 'open phone, dial xyz taxis' ??


tbh, she said "blind from birth", surely you would think she knew the score , who would take her etc .. just wanted a cheap ride imho, took the dog for a walk instead though :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
heathcote wrote:
It does not matter how she managed or was assisted to make a call for a vehicle she was refused the service on account of her eyes(dog).

I expect the guilty persons(driver and uber) have their licenses revoked by Licensing Authority.


Uber on 4 occassions send a driver who breaks the law why are they not having their license rescinded ? any other company would be on the RACK why not UBER :?:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 1:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
ven2112 wrote:
tbf, there are some cracking motors on uber (well the ones i have seen in Newcastle anyway, all mercs, audies etc ) & the last thing in the world i would take is a dog if i owned a car like that, shes blind, just drive past her , she couldn't see you anyway & just say it was a blank :roll:, you know part of the "criteria" here is having clean/fresh, cars too enable you hold a licence, yet they force you to take dogs? so what would happen if a punter complained to the council that they were "covered in dog hairs" i would be called to the council to explain why,if they were going for a night out with there best gear on then ?, that's why i think they should pay more, helps the valeting bills & they get mobility anyway, its a no win situation tbh




"ven2112" This is exactly the kind of attitude the TAXI(hackney carriage)trade can do with out,you are not correct with the assumption that all vehicles at uber are cracking motors,they have dirty,poor quality vehicles on their circuit, the same as other private hire operators,they are only interested in grabbing as much as possible from the drivers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2016 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:04 am
Posts: 2555
"ven2112" This is exactly the kind of attitude the TAXI(hackney carriage)trade can do with out,you are not correct with the assumption that all vehicles at uber are cracking motors,they have dirty,poor quality vehicles on their circuit, the same as other private hire operators,they are only interested in grabbing as much as possible from the drivers.[/quote]

that's why i said " the ones i seen in Newcastle", i aint seen a crappy uber car yet tbh , every uber car i have seen around here i would never ever in a million years put it on as a taxi , far to good


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2016 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Blind woman who was refused Uber taxis takes drivers to court for discrimination

Image

Uber is designed to be user friendly, one tap and a cab comes to you. It hasn't been as simple as that for Jade Sharp, who's blind.

Too often, she's been treated differently by drivers who discriminate.

Turned down a total of nine times since March last year.

I just find it humiliating because anyone should just be able to call a taxi, jump in and go to wherever they want.

I should not be having these problems just because I've got a disability, just because I've got a guide dog.

– Jade Sharp


Her guide Dog, 5-year-old Brodie, the reason Jade is refused.

Drivers who are adamant they don't take pets, are breaching equality laws - because Brodie is a Guide Dog.

I'm just trying to be independent and all these barriers are just getting in the way.

Uber is such a big company, their drivers, they should know what a guide dog is they, should know what an assistance dog is.

It's against the law to refuse a guide dog.

– Jade Sharp


We spoke to Uber and general manager for London Tom Elvidge who said: "This is not an experience that anybody should have to go through, the law is very clear on this and we, of course, hold exactly the same view. Our expectation of every single Uber driver is that guide dogs are not refused."

And yet, it keeps on happening. Today Jade and her parents arrived at court for the fifth time, to face the latest driver.

Ratnasingam Thayaparan is the driver who last June, refused Jade.

He was found guilty and ordered to pay a fine.

"I was fined £365 because I didn't accept a guide dog. The problem is I misunderstood on the phone - that's why it happened."

This has to stop happening now, the message has to get to Uber and other Private Hire vehicle offices that it's unacceptable.

Guide dog owners need their dogs to get around.

The question shouldn't be asked whether or not they take dogs.

– Rob Harris, Guide Dogs



With more discrimination cases against Uber drivers to come, Jade continues to fight for equality.

source: http://www.itv.com/news/london/2016-04- ... imination/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:04 am
Posts: 2555
:roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
captain cab wrote:
Blind woman who was refused Uber taxis takes drivers to court for discrimination

Image

Uber is designed to be user friendly, one tap and a cab comes to you. It hasn't been as simple as that for Jade Sharp, who's blind.

Too often, she's been treated differently by drivers who discriminate.

Turned down a total of nine times since March last year.

I just find it humiliating because anyone should just be able to call a taxi, jump in and go to wherever they want.

I should not be having these problems just because I've got a disability, just because I've got a guide dog.

– Jade Sharp


Her guide Dog, 5-year-old Brodie, the reason Jade is refused.

Drivers who are adamant they don't take pets, are breaching equality laws - because Brodie is a Guide Dog.

I'm just trying to be independent and all these barriers are just getting in the way.

Uber is such a big company, their drivers, they should know what a guide dog is they, should know what an assistance dog is.

It's against the law to refuse a guide dog.

– Jade Sharp


We spoke to Uber and general manager for London Tom Elvidge who said: "This is not an experience that anybody should have to go through, the law is very clear on this and we, of course, hold exactly the same view. Our expectation of every single Uber driver is that guide dogs are not refused."

And yet, it keeps on happening. Today Jade and her parents arrived at court for the fifth time, to face the latest driver.

Ratnasingam Thayaparan is the driver who last June, refused Jade.

He was found guilty and ordered to pay a fine.

"I was fined £365 because I didn't accept a guide dog. The problem is I misunderstood on the phone - that's why it happened."

This has to stop happening now, the message has to get to Uber and other Private Hire vehicle offices that it's unacceptable.

Guide dog owners need their dogs to get around.

The question shouldn't be asked whether or not they take dogs.

– Rob Harris, Guide Dogs



With more discrimination cases against Uber drivers to come, Jade continues to fight for equality.

source: http://www.itv.com/news/london/2016-04- ... imination/



They all want taking to court for discrimination.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chris the Fish and 731 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group